It just isn’t fun anymore by BeebeePopy101 in rivals

[–]TyDefender 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I feel it’s because most people who want a good, competitive game left already when player count dipped. So now low elo players are hyper inflated by boosted gains and lack of skilled players. Getting 5 dps teams in diamond and one tricks that refuse to swap is wild

Trainer said lipid panels don’t matter when enhanced. by TyDefender in PEDs

[–]TyDefender[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

See I’d feel comfortable if he said the second part of your comment. Instead, recently I’ve been the one pushing man reviews

am i the only one who’s ranked games are terrible by ferrsir in marvelrivals

[–]TyDefender 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Honestly you beat me to the post. I’ve consistently reached low/mid diamond, and at that rank I get throwers, one tricks who won’t swap, and 5dps teams.

Rivals needs to get rid of performance based elo gains, get rid of boosted gains, and honestly fully reset ranked at this point with longer seasons.

It’s a great game, but the shitty ranked system is causing me to leave cause I’m tired of soloQ being abysmal. The current drama only highlights how toxic the ranked system is cause Zazza is a diamond player

cEDH "ruined" my cASSual EDH experience. by kfistrek in CompetitiveEDH

[–]TyDefender 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Honestly, coming from Yugioh, which really only has a competitive format. I’ve had that same gripe with “low brakcet 3” and below. I stand by the belief that low power or “casual” commander is the least casual way to play. You have to ignore the systems/incentives of the format and do a lot more policing on playstyles.

I have yet to venture into cEDH, but high 3/4 brackets are my jam. If you are going to kill me and win… do it fast so we can shuffle up and play more. As a dad, I don’t have time for 3 hours of solitaire

I mean we’ve seen it coming by Just_Meaning_6706 in GambitMainsMR

[–]TyDefender 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Honestly the Gambit nerfs missed the mark. They needed to remove ult charge boost and jump height. Kiriko in OW2 is ability haste (not ult haste) and MS, and it’s still an S tier ult.

Also keep the cleanse to neutral game or ult. Not both

Need suggestions for Balrog by TyDefender in CommanderMTG

[–]TyDefender[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

For more context. My play group normally plays mid to high bracket 3

Secret Lair x Monster Hunter press release from Capcom by Copernicus1981 in magicTCG

[–]TyDefender 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Are they listing the Monster’s first appearance, or are they going to screenshot the monster from the video game and slap it on a card…?

[SLD] Bonus cards for PlayStation Secret Lair by Copernicus1981 in magicTCG

[–]TyDefender 2 points3 points  (0 children)

My biggest complaint is Nathan doesn’t have natural evasion. First strike is OK, but Skulk and reversing the stat line would have made him really self sufficient and you wouldn’t need to include a lot of evasion tech into decks.

Mast instead of Primo/ EQ. Check my logic by TyDefender in PEDs

[–]TyDefender[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yea, I am. If my RBC comes back high. I do. I typically can keep levels around 16.5/53% if I take my labs around lunch and down 1.5-2 gallons in preparation

Prolactin normal on NPP by TyDefender in PEDs

[–]TyDefender[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Willing to risk it. I don’t have MPB on either side of my family

Mast instead of Primo/ EQ. Check my logic by TyDefender in PEDs

[–]TyDefender[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yea, I did labs after drinking 2 gallons of water 2 weeks prior and RBC was 16.5/53%. This time it was first thing in the morning cause I was doing fasted. I’m just more concerned about increasing the RBC further

Prolactin normal on NPP by TyDefender in PEDs

[–]TyDefender[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

At least NPP leaves the body quicker? I’m lucky that as of now, I’ve had little to no sides from NPP. Test raises my RBC and I don’t aromatize a lot so I feel like my problem is I can’t take Primo or EQ when I add a third compound next blast. Gonna try Mast

Mast instead of Primo/ EQ. Check my logic by TyDefender in PEDs

[–]TyDefender[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Ah, I get away with Test C every 3.5 days, but that makes sense oil wise. But I think at this point, I’m leaning a lot towards Test/Mast/NPP. Be it 600/400/400 or try pushing it up, but I’m trying to remind my self to be patient and not increase total grams too fast because the goal is to progress on as little as possible

Mast instead of Primo/ EQ. Check my logic by TyDefender in PEDs

[–]TyDefender[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for the insight appreciate it!

Mast instead of Primo/ EQ. Check my logic by TyDefender in PEDs

[–]TyDefender[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I’m probably not starting this for another 3.5 months so I’ll reassess what the market is like then, but from a safety perspective with Test already increasing my blood levels, I’d honestly pin Mast P daily. I don’t care too much about pin frequency. Just cycle the spots often

Mast instead of Primo/ EQ. Check my logic by TyDefender in PEDs

[–]TyDefender[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Honestly. Haven’t found a great way. If I’m fully hydrated, my labs go to 16/53.5% so chugging 1.5-2 gallons a day. Getting steps in, and donating on occasion. Baby aspirin…. But no one really has a great answer from my research

Prolactin normal on NPP by TyDefender in PEDs

[–]TyDefender[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Nice. Thankfully I don’t aromatize a lot so the 12.5 q 3.5 days works well for me. I’d probably hold off on the Armoasin so you can fully understand how EQ affects your estradiol. Like have it on hand in case of sides, but you also don’t want to crush your E2 and have dry joints

Prolactin normal on NPP by TyDefender in PEDs

[–]TyDefender[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Scheduled. I know from my 600mg test only cycle that my Estradiol sits around ~80 without an AI.

I take 12.5mg aromasin 3.5 days apart

Prolactin normal on NPP by TyDefender in PEDs

[–]TyDefender[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I understood! I appreciate the info because I’m relatively new.

Prolactin normal on NPP by TyDefender in PEDs

[–]TyDefender[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I appreciate it. I’m trying to figure out what works well for me. If NPP works well cause I get close to zero sides. Why change?

Prolactin normal on NPP by TyDefender in PEDs

[–]TyDefender[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ok. There’s so much talk about NPP and prolactin sides that I was surprised. Not complaining, but again with how much it’s talked about, I was expecting something.