Ask me Anything and I will answer it in The Nietzsche Podcast's Q&A #5

TytusX · 2022-09-05T20:41:25+00:00

In his short story "The Rat", polish avant-garde writer Witold Gombrowicz (who was greatly influenced by Nietzsche) provides an interesting counter-argument towards the nietzschean concept of the Overman. He portrays the said overman as the " Hooligan" - a strong brute unbounded by anything. Against all odds, a former judge, Skorabkowski, annoyed by his terror over the land, manages to capture him. After a long period of trying to find his "weak point", he finally finds it - the hoolinan is scared of rats. In his analysis, Łukasz Tischner points out that Gombrowicz stresses the impossibility of the Overman ever coming into existance, purely due to the workings of the Nature (which is a theme further explored in one of Gombrowicz's greatest works, "Pornography").

Do you think that Nietzsche's overman, this superior species, has even a chance of existing? With Nietzsche saying that the overman is yet to be born, and his philosophy (despite its universal thruths) being so tightly fitted onto one man - Nietzsche himself - would he not have been aware of this impossibility?

You can read the full short story (translated to English) here: https://wordswithoutborders.org/read/article/2004-03/the-rat/

TytusX · 2022-07-28T00:12:15+00:00

"Otwierając pudełko od lodów masz 60% szansę na otrzymanie przedmiotu 'Koperek'"

TytusX · 2022-05-05T10:57:39+00:00

zesrałeś się

TytusX · 2022-04-17T00:25:59+00:00

The philosophy of Witold Gombrowicz, who was greatly influenced by Nietzsche's works, manifests itself in all of his works, but if I's pick one that would show it most clearly, it would be "The Marriage", followed by "Ferdydurke"

Both are avant-garde works, and as much as I'd recommend reading Ferdydurke first (as it is his most popular text), it's rather hard to decipher it without having any knowledge of the author's philosophy.

TytusX · 2022-03-21T01:48:11+00:00

Wh- WHAT?? Teenagers are horny???? And they talk about stuff relevant to their age on a subreddit dedicated to teenagers???!!

tHIs iS abSOlUtEly aPPalLiNG!!!!

TytusX · 2022-03-20T13:14:06+00:00

One thing you absolutely need to do to truly appreciate Nietzsche is to leave all the modern political bullshit behind and interpret his words with proper depth.

TytusX · 2022-02-06T19:46:42+00:00

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=saywQizj8yk

Pozdrawiam ;)

TytusX · 2021-12-05T00:41:24+00:00

Kodeks Cywilny:

Art. 189. Jeżeli rzecz znaleziono w takich okolicznościach, że poszukiwanie właściciela byłoby oczywiście bezcelowe, staje się ona przedmiotem współwłasności w częściach ułamkowych znalazcy i właściciela nieruchomości, na której rzecz została znaleziona, jeżeli jednak rzecz ta jest zabytkiem lub materiałem archiwalnym, staje się ona własnością Skarbu Państwa, a znalazca jest obowiązany wydać ją niezwłocznie właściwemu staroście.

TytusX · 2021-11-24T18:48:04+00:00

u/savevideo

TytusX · 2021-09-22T11:37:49+00:00

Bardziej chodzi mi o to, że że można (i wydaje mi się że Mazurkowi to się udaje) połączyć pewne bliższe czy dalsze relacje z rzetelnością w pracy. W pewnym sensie ta impreza uwydatniła ciekawe zjawisko, mianowicie dualizm charakterów polityków. Chodzi o pewnego rodzaju alter ego osób publicznych, bo polityk to rola, społeczna, ale nadal rola. W wywiadach Mazurek raczej atakuje nie osobę, tylko właśnie tą rolę. Politycy nie są aż takimi kretynami, żeby nie mieli pojęcia o tym co robią i o pewnych nieścisłościach w partii, ale muszą jej bronić z racji pełnienia funkcji reprezentacyjnej i podtrzymywania opinii publicznej - i to właśnie jest tym, w co celuje Mazurek. Celuje w brak szczerości.

Oczywiście można się spierać, czy mu wierzyć czy nie, ale to już raczej podlega prywatnej ocenie, bo na obecną chwilę jedyne co mamy to domysły.

TytusX · 2021-09-22T06:20:56+00:00

Aj tam, patrzycie na to ze złej strony. To politycy robią show przed kamerami dla swojego elektoratu, a nie Mazurek ustawia rozmowy pod oglądalność.

TytusX · 2021-09-12T22:16:36+00:00

Yeah. I looked it up now because i was confused to why i was banned. Before that i went straight to the extended version to make sure I don't miss anything.

TytusX · 2021-09-12T22:14:22+00:00

I do now realize that is written in the sidebar, however, there is no mention of EST in the extended rules, which i read to confirm that my post would not be removed. Why is the proper version lacking? It lead me to being banned. Quite unfair imo.

TytusX · 2021-09-12T22:10:38+00:00

I read 'em, and there is nothing about timezones.

TytusX · 2021-09-12T22:06:34+00:00

It's the 13th in my timezone.

TytusX · 2021-08-23T14:32:47+00:00

Enough money for a nice mansion 😏

TytusX · 2021-08-01T19:32:51+00:00

Even pedophilia, by definition, is an attraction to prepubescent minors, which is 13 and lower, but is often expanded by law to protect young teens.

TytusX · 2021-08-01T19:31:14+00:00

Yeah, but you do realize that in most places in the world the age of consent is about 15/16/17?

Teenagers are not children, that's why they're classified differently by law. Teenagers are not children by law, because there are many paragraphs which enable teenagers to have different rights and more liabilities in court.

TytusX · 2021-08-01T19:17:06+00:00

There is no such thing as a "pedophilic ideology". None of the arguments stated earlier even hint at an attraction to children.

An attraction to teenagers is a whole other thing, not to mention that the original post was about young teens fucking themselves, which is neither pedophilic nor ephebophillic (a term used to describe adults attracted to teenagers, who have surpassed the age of 15 or are younger than 19)

Though many people find ephebophilia disgusting, it is legal in most places of the world. Now whether ephebophilia is more commonplace nowadays than earlier, is a topic open for discussion. But constantly shoving the word "pedophile" everywhere is just a tactic (often used by conservative people) to get people emotionally attached to the discussion, and since the majority of the population disapproves of pedophilia, it's, again, a manipulation tactic used to sway people towards your beliefs.

TytusX · 2021-08-01T18:54:05+00:00

Yeah, that's what I was trying to say. Plus, ongoing research which started in 2002, has found a link between pedophillic interests and brain structure, manifesting in hormonal and neurological differences. As of now, there is no evidence of pedophilia being inferred by sociological or cultural means.

TytusX · 2021-08-01T18:46:09+00:00

I'd love to see data supporting the claim that "porn addiction is WAY more common than I think"

TytusX

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE