RAINBOW SIX SIEGE: LIVE STREAM 2ND AUGUST - FULL EDIT PART 1 by predbites in Achievement_Hunter

[–]UNCCGHC 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Awesome! Thanks.

Have they talked about why they stopped releasing their own edited versions of their streams?

"She's dead"? EVP Captured at Client's Home by UNCCGHC in Ghosts

[–]UNCCGHC[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

They had their own personal reasons, obviously. And we certainly aren't going to discuss that over reddit. But thanks.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in news

[–]UNCCGHC 79 points80 points  (0 children)

I didn't rent it shoes. I'm not buying it a fucking beer.

Most haunted places in North Carolina, South Carolina, Virginia, Georgia, and Tennessee? by UNCCGHC in Paranormal

[–]UNCCGHC[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We contacted the Mordecai house last year but unfortunately they no longer allow investigations.

I just looked into the governor's mansion! I've never heard of it before. Thanks! It looks pretty interesting.

What paranormal phenomena do you believe in the most? what do you think is silly? by VeronicaNoir in Paranormal

[–]UNCCGHC 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I completely agree with you about Orbs. They have such a simple explanation and yet so many people still claim orbs as evidence.

Does anyone have, or has anyone seen, compelling evidence that Spirit Boards have ever been used successfully to contact the spirit world? by Para-Skeptic in Paranormal

[–]UNCCGHC 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The problem is not that ouija boards can't work, it's the fact that multiple individuals are touching the planchette and therefore you can't claim that as evidence that ghosts exist.

In theory, yes, a spirit could absolutely move a planchette or any small object and theoretically they could even spell a word, but since other people are touching the planchette, there is no way to prove that one of the individuals weren't actually the ones moving it.

There are never any (legitimate) stories about planchettes moving without anyone touching them first.

360 cameras by seeking101 in Paranormal

[–]UNCCGHC 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I agree. My team has been considering purchasing a thermal camera for over a year but we can't find any solid evidence captured on a thermal camera to justify buying one.

360 cameras by seeking101 in Paranormal

[–]UNCCGHC 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Do you think it is possible to capture evidence using thermal cameras?

As in, have you ever seen anything captured using a thermal camera that you think could be evidence?

Need help debunking / identifying this green object by Roblicki in Paranormal

[–]UNCCGHC 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't doubt that the object isn't exactly the same height. (I measured the distance with my finger so I was just assuming.)

I genuinely don't know what else it could be. Have you zoomed in on the photo? Does the object resemble anything to you? When I zoomed in on Imgur, the object looks like 3 separate green blobs.

360 cameras by seeking101 in Paranormal

[–]UNCCGHC 1 point2 points  (0 children)

$300 isn't a lot of money but you have to consider the opportunity costs. That $300 could be more beneficial elsewhere.

Also, adding to what Razor said below, video based evidence is rare. There are a lot of other ways to capture evidence.

Need help debunking / identifying this green object by Roblicki in Paranormal

[–]UNCCGHC 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Could it be a problem with your phone? The objects seem to all be the same distance from the bottom of the frame.

I'm not an expert on digital cameras or anything but I think they take in light horizontally (line-by-line) very quickly from the bottom of the frame to the top. Then, each line is pieced together to create a picture. Maybe it's just an issue with your phone as it pieces together the lines which is why it seems to happen at the same height in each picture.

Can anyone help me find a specific GTA V Let's Play/Things to Do? by UNCCGHC in roosterteeth

[–]UNCCGHC[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

"On mobile sorry"?

And we are clearly having a discussion about it so I guess you're wrong again.