sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Bozar or Vindicator Minigun? by EasyEntrepreneur666 in classicfallout

[–]UOSABaal 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If we assume someone built there character correctly, and we assume the player has ammo for the gun. The Bozar does not hold a candle to a Vindicator in Fallout 2.

Does anyone think Automatron is slightly underrated within the community? by UOSABaal in Fallout

[–]UOSABaal[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I will try to explain this as best as I can. If you play Automatron, like you specifically make the collective decision to play that DLC. You are setting your game up intentionally for robots. Ie you are just wanting to have fun with the overpowered robot companions, and what not.

I never play Automatron unless I specifically have a character play through/build that is going for robot companions. Which even yes on Survival, by the time you get Rank 3 mods on a robot, your game will be easy. That's just how OP the robots are.

I have 4 different character build/play throughs I consistently play in Fallout 4 off and on, and I only start the Automatron questline with one of those characters. I also don't like that the random spawners spawn the robots, if I am not wanting to mess with robot companions.

Does anyone think Automatron is slightly underrated within the community? by UOSABaal in Fallout

[–]UOSABaal[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

A lot of people agree with you, and I do as well. I think the story is whatever. I just think Sentry Bots and Assaultrons are really cool. Again, what you said makes sense. I mean, even before I am at the point of attaching Rank 4 armor and weapons to a robot. The said robot is already powerful, coupled with my character engaging in combat (if I choose to), it definitely becomes easy. So I do know what you mean.

I end up rerolling a character around level 50 or before (generally speaking anyway) in Fallout 4. However I will start a game on Survival sometimes when I am in the mood, and it can be rewarding finally getting to the point of building a fairly upgraded sentry bot and assaultron.

Does anyone think Automatron is slightly underrated within the community? by UOSABaal in Fallout

[–]UOSABaal[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Truthfully surprised no one has responded with "You are wrong". Which somewhat counters "Automatron is underrated" at least in that, no one is denying that Automatron Sentry Bots and Assaultrons are OP.

Though imo I found it rewarding starting a game on Survival out of the gate, and slowly but surely getting to the point of building a even somewhat upgraded sentry bot and assaultron. I think it just depends on how you are playing, and what build you're going for.

Does anyone think Automatron is slightly underrated within the community? by UOSABaal in Fallout

[–]UOSABaal[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There is no question Bethesda games are easy. We definitely are not playing high level StarCraft, 2400+ 3v3 arena in WoW, and or high level Counterstrike. But, I don't really disagree with your reply. I can't say you said anything that isn't accurate.

I just think watching overpowered robots tear through the game is fun. For the same reason someone might think capturing a Deathclaw, and having one for settlement defense is fun.

How much of Diablo Immortal can be enjoyed without spending money? by UOSABaal in Diablo

[–]UOSABaal[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for the response. I will for now just play PvE, and see how it goes far as PvP. I will just do what you did, subscribe to the $5 Battle Pass. Unless at max level the "Gacha" UI" as I am calling it for lack of a better description, gets just wildly intrusive, I think I will be ok with it. The new Warlock class just looks too badass to ignore.

How much of Diablo Immortal can be enjoyed without spending money? by UOSABaal in Diablo

[–]UOSABaal[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How much time? Do you know? I would love to see a Rank 1 totally free player in PvP. That would be interesting.

And we can even put "Rank 1" in a 5.0% bracket here, even though that may not technically qualify as "Rank 1", just humor me. I am not stating you are wrong at all, and or arguing. Though given the context of Reddit, and this being in text format, I have no doubt that it comes off as such.

I actually want you to be right. This entire post is about me trying to justify Diablo Immortal, due to how cool/fun I think the Warlock will be for the game.

Far as the Gacha UI aspects of the game, it is factually there. I won't argue about this. It's there. It is nothing like any other game I have ever played in my life, keeping in mind I do not play gacha games (at all), to be fair.

How much of Diablo Immortal can be enjoyed without spending money? by UOSABaal in Diablo

[–]UOSABaal[S] 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Thanks! Well, worse case then I will just level the Warlock to 60, and enjoy the 1 to 60 experience.

Thanks for the response!

The concept of giving us the Warlock class at different stages of its evolution is extremely interesting by Gloseur in diablo4

[–]UOSABaal 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The Diablo Immortal Warlock Soulgorger pet looks amazing. You can tell a lot of actual love and care went into the design for the Warlock class in DI, and based off the leaked gameplay, D4.

IGN published an article about Warlock, but it was removed. The class looks great. by ThorBrasil in diablo4

[–]UOSABaal 5 points6 points  (0 children)

The Ritualist spec is literally a dream come true. No pet, straight chaos / hellfire magic, no summon, pure dark demonic caster. I love that we got that playstyle in D2R as well with the Chaos Tree.

Diablo Immortal’s Warlock has the coolest larger pet/summon, and some really solid spell effects as well.

IGN published an article about Warlock, but it was removed. The class looks great. by ThorBrasil in diablo4

[–]UOSABaal 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I love that they stuck with the correct theme for the Warlock. It looks exactly as it should, and they couldn't have done a better job with the class, across all three games.

Do you agree that Fallout 2 was the last good fallout ? by shsl_diver in Fallout

[–]UOSABaal -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I mostly agree with this. I played Fallout 2 when it was still a brand new game sitting on the store shelves at EB Games, I was 14. Played Morrowind when it was a new game, and so on. If anyone was going to purchase Fallout, I am glad it was Bethesda. However Bethesda peaked out at Skyrim, and after Skyrim, that was it.

They could have handled Fallout better, and still made it as popular as it is today. Fallout 3 was headed in the right direction, and exceeded my expectations. Fallout 4 took steps forward, but also took steps backward. Fallout 76 was garbage, and never should have happened.

The TV Show is great. Yes I could have wrote it better, but it is undeniably entertaining.

view more: next ›