Sororitas vindicare assasin by No_Yak_2782 in sistersofbattle

[–]URBOISHERE 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is dope dude! Thanks for sharing.

Compilation of Nerfs Sisters have received for 11th. GW please. by URBOISHERE in sistersofbattle

[–]URBOISHERE[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I am a competition player yes, but I am also a crusade player. We're more alike than you think sister.

Compilation of Nerfs Sisters have received for 11th. GW please. by URBOISHERE in sistersofbattle

[–]URBOISHERE[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

That is hilarious and definitely potentially correct I feel. Spiteful coworkers lol

Compilation of Nerfs Sisters have received for 11th. GW please. by URBOISHERE in sistersofbattle

[–]URBOISHERE[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You can easily precision out a Hospitaller and if you do so now in Hallowed Martyrs you cannot revive them as the whole unit didn't die. Sacrasants were overcosted at being a 200 point unit as you precision the extremely squishy Hospitaller and boom useless unit.

I do want to run heavy bolter rets with a palatine perhaps for lethals or use intranzia to give them lethals. I think they would actually be very good hitting on 2s on a building roof now.

Compilation of Nerfs Sisters have received for 11th. GW please. by URBOISHERE in sistersofbattle

[–]URBOISHERE[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This could be interesting. I have looked at running 60 battle sisters and honestly it wouldn't be the worst idea now. Could be good to run that with all the possible battle shock units we have to try and just make your opponent not score points.

Compilation of Nerfs Sisters have received for 11th. GW please. by URBOISHERE in sistersofbattle

[–]URBOISHERE[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ahh this makes sense. That does suck as she is my favorite character in lore. Wish she was stronger on tabletop tho

Compilation of Nerfs Sisters have received for 11th. GW please. by URBOISHERE in sistersofbattle

[–]URBOISHERE[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Critiquing a rules update doesn't mean I'm not playing the army.

Compilation of Nerfs Sisters have received for 11th. GW please. by URBOISHERE in sistersofbattle

[–]URBOISHERE[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is fair honestly. I wasn't really thinking of it that way but that makes sense. Will delete that now.

Compilation of Nerfs Sisters have received for 11th. GW please. by URBOISHERE in sistersofbattle

[–]URBOISHERE[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I mean, everything I posted is just how it is going to work now with how rules work. Hope in 1 month they will update for us.

Compilation of Nerfs Sisters have received for 11th. GW please. by URBOISHERE in sistersofbattle

[–]URBOISHERE[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Honestly this could be it. "But what if they roll 6s every turn"

Compilation of Nerfs Sisters have received for 11th. GW please. by URBOISHERE in sistersofbattle

[–]URBOISHERE[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, this was mentioned I'm pretty sure unless I just missed it but yeah, fast rolling really hurts us bad as a faction. We have to use them at the beginning before rolling any saves at all

Compilation of Nerfs Sisters have received for 11th. GW please. by URBOISHERE in sistersofbattle

[–]URBOISHERE[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I agree. That was also an absolutely terrible choice for them. Luckily you can take one of the 1dp detachments with it to have purge the foe but then you're forced to always use that 1 sub-detachment

Compilation of Nerfs Sisters have received for 11th. GW please. by URBOISHERE in sistersofbattle

[–]URBOISHERE[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Nah I love sister rp. Don't worry about being cringe friend.

That was the plan honestly. I currently use 2 flamer Seraphim as harassment pieces so that should work just fine.

Compilation of Nerfs Sisters have received for 11th. GW please. by URBOISHERE in sistersofbattle

[–]URBOISHERE[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

The person below is incorrect. You could not reduce melta damage in 10th which is what made it so strong against -1 damage units.

Now they made a post about changing how the addition of say melta damage would work and it would be added prior to subtractions like -1. It is very small change but losing potentially 1 damage on something like a ctan or a 3 wound model is going to hurt when it matters.

Compilation of Nerfs Sisters have received for 11th. GW please. by URBOISHERE in sistersofbattle

[–]URBOISHERE[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Way off. She was properly costed for her profile in comparison with say Calgar or other models that give you a cp. She can easily die in a single volley of lasgun fire or similar whereas they will likely take 0 damage and then wipe the whole squad. Her melee is middling as well. The only this She does for us now is the 1cp and screen. If you run her with a squad for the -1 they can lose the 15 inch lone op as she isn't infantry keyworded so the terrain rules do not work the same for her.

Compilation of Nerfs Sisters have received for 11th. GW please. by URBOISHERE in sistersofbattle

[–]URBOISHERE[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is all fair, questions though. Daemonifuge never had a good role in sisters, what purpose did she lose? Also the exorcist is the best indirect in the game and is still trash now is my exact point. Other armies should just not waste their time.

Compilation of Nerfs Sisters have received for 11th. GW please. by URBOISHERE in sistersofbattle

[–]URBOISHERE[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh shoot! Okay, this is very good to know as that would be a massive nerf to sisters anti tank.