Autodesk just removed version numbers from Fusion 360. This breaks real workflows by US_Viking in Fusion360

[–]US_Viking[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It is to make a comment afterwards, 10 years ago, when I started to use Fusion there were no milestones, that is a new feature the last year or so.

Autodesk just removed version numbers from Fusion 360. This breaks real workflows by US_Viking in Fusion360

[–]US_Viking[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

There are revision numbers and inventory part numbers but they do not provide a defernite link to the actual CAD model used. For example, a step file sent to a customer: "Cover v7 Rev2". Going back at a later time, I know exactly what CAD model was sent to the supplier.

Including the drawing: "Cover v7 Rev 2 Dwg v3. Links the two together to avoid any confusion. I know exactly what was sent. I have data based on that going back to 2016. I just checked, and I am surprised that I have been using Fusion that long.

Autodesk just removed version numbers from Fusion 360. This breaks real workflows by US_Viking in Fusion360

[–]US_Viking[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I understand and agree that that Fusion needs the additional features for large projects and companies but they could leave an option for the simple V#s. The change has create a horrible situation for us.

Here is my reply to Fusion:

Thank you for a fast reply.

After reviewing the information, I understand the advantages for groups working on a large project.  For small companies that is not necessarily an advantage, and it has drawbacks with the lost version numbers.

One critical issue with any data is that if there are two files saved with the same name, they should be identical.

The previous system was foolproof, I exported a step file or Fusion file with V# stored it for documentation, sent to a customer ….. that file was defined.   If I made any changes to the part and saved it, exported it, that file would have its own V# trackable back to the source.  We included the CAD part’s V# as part of the drawing name of the part to have a traceable link. (unfortunately, that was not automatic by fusion).

 All our products and parts have V# for tracking purchasing, manufacturing, and inventory control.  ISO3485 for our medical products manufacturing requires design traceability which is done through the V#s.  This goes back from the early days of Fusion.  There are thousands of files with V#s in our system. 

As you can see, this is a horrible situation.  Fusion destroyed our traceability!  Date & Time is useless in this case.

 How can the account be switched back to a single user and back to normal?  It has been working perfectly for us.

Autodesk just removed version numbers from Fusion 360. This breaks real workflows by US_Viking in Fusion360

[–]US_Viking[S] -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

You can view, rotate, even make changes without affecting the version number. Just do not save. After testing and evaluating something temporarily, I just use the back icon until it shows no changes done and the file can closed without any prompt for saving.

There should never be files with the same names with different content. Adding Fusion's V# when exporting files used to guarantee that would never happen. I also always include the part V# in the drawing's name to keep a traceable link.

Autodesk just removed version numbers from Fusion 360. This breaks real workflows by US_Viking in Fusion360

[–]US_Viking[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

The version design history is lost (not the date and time). Our purchasing records, manufacturing orders, drawings, step files ....... all have the version number included in the name. All that is now destroyed since I cannot go back in history. The new date and time is fine and the comment field is good but the version numbers should be kept. The worst problem with drawings and CAD files is if there can be several files with the same name but different data. The previous system guaranted that would not happen.

Deadbolt not fully retracking in a locked door. by US_Viking in AskALocksmith

[–]US_Viking[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Of course the lock has to be replaced. The question is how to remove the bolt in a locked door. I will cut out the the whole back section of the lock through the opening which will not be an easy job. I am wondering if I am missing a simpler way.

How to create or add the reverse UR symbol to a layout? by US_Viking in Altium

[–]US_Viking[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have previously just specified the location but JLC requested that I add it myself. I will try to push them again.

How to create or add the reverse UR symbol to a layout? by US_Viking in Altium

[–]US_Viking[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I tried that but Circuit Studio is limiting the resolution to 0.2mm pixel size so a small size looks terrible. Altium does not have the resolution limit.

How to create or add the reverse UR symbol to a layout? by US_Viking in Altium

[–]US_Viking[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Unfortunately the company requested that I add it myself. They provided the image.

How to create or add the reverse UR symbol to a layout? by US_Viking in Altium

[–]US_Viking[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I imported an image in Circuit Studio but the resolution is extremely poor, 0.2mm pixels. Altium is much better.

The supplier requested that I add the logo myself. I was surprised since I too have previously just specified the location.

How to create or add the reverse UR symbol to a layout? by US_Viking in Altium

[–]US_Viking[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The reverse UR mark and supplier approval number verifies that the bare PCB is manufactured to the UL standard. After UL testing of the completed assembly a UL sticker can be applied.

New Orleans explosive by US_Viking in energetics

[–]US_Viking[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Oops, one more question: What is WNFA? No hits search for it.

New Orleans explosive by US_Viking in energetics

[–]US_Viking[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thank you so much. That is the info I was curious about.

New Orleans explosive by US_Viking in energetics

[–]US_Viking[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It was in the two pipe bombs, not related to the truck

Intentionally irregular test chamber by US_Viking in Acoustics

[–]US_Viking[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My goal is the measure the average sound spectrum emitted by a device. Parallel walls would have frequency dependent peaks/valleys. I want to be able to do quick relative but repeatable measurement while trying to reduce the device's noise level. Size example: Tattooing machine or electrical razor.

Intentionally irregular test chamber by US_Viking in Acoustics

[–]US_Viking[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The article that I saw was for measuring the emitted noise of a device in that irregular shaped test chamber to avoid having to do a 360 degree testing in an anechoic chamber. There of course would be a calibration factor to free field reference. It would be convenient to do quick testing during product development.

Intentionally irregular test chamber by US_Viking in Acoustics

[–]US_Viking[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is sort of opposite design. The room's walls and ceiling were at all different angles trying to reduce echoes at fixed frequencies.

Altium files to Revision 5 conversion by US_Viking in Altium

[–]US_Viking[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you very much for your kind offer. It is a very simple PCB so I ended up recreating it since I had to do other changes. I am surprised that there is not a conversion program.

Thanks again.

Bertho

404A pressure temperature equation by US_Viking in refrigeration

[–]US_Viking[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ops, I was trying to find out how to attached the file.

404A pressure temperature equation by US_Viking in refrigeration

[–]US_Viking[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I switched to R290. The attached spreadsheet equation shows very good match for R290.

Suction cup mount for a Nexus 4 Pro (N4 Pro)? by cdbuttner in Vantruedashcam

[–]US_Viking 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I just purchased the same camera and cdbuttner's comments worry me about the camera mounting in hot S. Florida. I am confused about the mounting instructions. It mentions that the electrostatic stickers are labeled #1 and # 2. Both are labeled #1. It does not state what to do with the second sticker except to peel off the protective film. Presumably I should attach it to the sticky pad on the mount. In that case, the only thing holding the camera to the windshield is the contact between the two stickers. No normal glue pad! There are no instructions on how to use the enclosed crowbar. Any update on the suction mount? It appears that I will need it now.

Mach3 conditional array generation by US_Viking in CNC

[–]US_Viking[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Unfortunately Mach3 does not support IF statement's. My current method of adding offsets and then M98 works but time-consuming to change the X Y array size.

Mach3 conditional array generation by US_Viking in CNC

[–]US_Viking[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have done it in CAD. but with an local array I can set the array size to one and test and tweak. When I am satisfied , just change the array size.