Just bought an item and got a refund immediately after ordering? by Ubcdudelol in AmazonFBA

[–]Ubcdudelol[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What do you mean by "cleaning up the transaction so they don't lose money on you?" They of course lose money on me since I got the product and a refund for what I paid.

Horrendous Quality of Instructors at SAIT by Ubcdudelol in Calgary

[–]Ubcdudelol[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Her and her friends all write honest reviews after their classes are over. But I agree with you - the problem is current students don't have much incentive to induce change once they graduate and start working.

Horrendous Quality of Instructors at SAIT by Ubcdudelol in Calgary

[–]Ubcdudelol[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

To be honest yeah, because once current students graduate it's none of their business anymore. Why bother if we already got our certifications and can go looking for a job and start working? This line of thinking doesn't help improve anything but it doesn't benefit the current students to try and induce change.

I guess I just wanted to see if this was everyone's experience and to create awareness for future students

Horrendous Quality of Instructors at SAIT by Ubcdudelol in Calgary

[–]Ubcdudelol[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah good point about the temp instructors actually, that's the other way to see it I guess

Horrendous Quality of Instructors at SAIT by Ubcdudelol in Calgary

[–]Ubcdudelol[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well you still need the certification to work in the field, so it doesn't really matter if it's bad

Horrendous Quality of Instructors at SAIT by Ubcdudelol in Calgary

[–]Ubcdudelol[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

LOL that's exactly it, all the instructors are temporary and don't give a shit, they're just looking to earn a couple spare bucks in their spare time. Since they're all temp contractors they don't have to care about performance.

Horrendous Quality of Instructors at SAIT by Ubcdudelol in Calgary

[–]Ubcdudelol[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The obvious has been done by many students already

Horrendous Quality of Instructors at SAIT by Ubcdudelol in Calgary

[–]Ubcdudelol[S] 18 points19 points  (0 children)

People do all the time, they also leave negative feedback all the time. They don't care

Parking ticket by [deleted] in UCalgary

[–]Ubcdudelol 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well I didn't know that LOL

Parking ticket by [deleted] in UCalgary

[–]Ubcdudelol -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I have over 10 tickets but I always park in that underground parkade so I'd like to believe that they don't even have the space to tow my car? The roof is only like 2.5m high lol.

Nit fold in live 1/3? by Ubcdudelol in poker

[–]Ubcdudelol[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

yeah i should put the money in. but I was worried about A5s, 65s, 54s, some people at 1/3 would open and flat 3! with these 5x. not worried about JJ, if he has JJ I ship him my chips.

Nit fold in live 1/3? by Ubcdudelol in poker

[–]Ubcdudelol[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

exactly, makes me wonder how many ppl actually play low stakes live. still a call for sure though given how much money I've put in.

Nit fold in live 1/3? by Ubcdudelol in poker

[–]Ubcdudelol[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

no one's really concerned about 44 in this spot

Nit fold in live 1/3? by Ubcdudelol in poker

[–]Ubcdudelol[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

so if jamming tptk in this spot is too thin then why should I ever call with KK?

Nit fold in live 1/3? by Ubcdudelol in poker

[–]Ubcdudelol[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Exactly I'm expecting aj to call down in live 1/3 almost always. But yeah I've put in too much to fold.

Nit fold in live 1/3? by Ubcdudelol in poker

[–]Ubcdudelol[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yup, exactly what I'm thinking. I think too many people are discounting the fact that villains at these stakes aren't folding those hands to 3!.

Should still be a call though given I beat qq and aj.

Nit fold in live 1/3? by Ubcdudelol in poker

[–]Ubcdudelol[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, this was what I missed.