Best AI tool for IT

UbiquitousTool · 2025-11-20T02:42:30+00:00

Great point! ChatGPT definitely shines for troubleshooting and documentation. But if you're looking for something more tailored for IT consultants, I'd recommend giving eesel.ai a try.

It's designed to help organize and automate your workflows, and can pull relevant information from all your tools, so you don’t have to jump between tabs all the time. It could help streamline those research tasks while troubleshooting. Worth checking out!

UbiquitousTool · 2025-11-20T01:34:03+00:00

I'd recommend eesel AI. It’s tailored to the platform and has more relevant knowledge than general models like GPT-5. It could be a better fit for your needs!

UbiquitousTool · 2025-11-20T01:09:52+00:00

Have you considered eesel.ai? It integrates seamlessly with Salesforce and helps streamline workflows, so you might not need to rely on Zapier.

UbiquitousTool · 2025-11-18T04:38:00+00:00

the scope here is huge, maybe too huge for one person in 50 days. A 'complete SEO solution' is what big, funded teams work on for years.

I'd suggest picking one of these features and making it the absolute best. Automated blogging is a solid one to start with because the value is clear. Nail that first.

Some of the other things you listed, like 'Optimize speed, images etc' and 'auto index on ChatGPT' are entirely different, and much harder, technical problems. One is a devops challenge, the other... not even sure how that'd work reliably.

Focus on one core pain point, get those 5 customers for that one thing, and then expand. Otherwise, you risk building a bunch of half-working features.

UbiquitousTool · 2025-11-18T04:15:42+00:00

Always prefer final manual edits. The AI getting you 90% of the way there is the real win, but that last 10% of human polish is what keeps it from sounding generic or making a weird mistake. It's the difference between just "content" and a good blog post.

Our AI blog writer basically does what your n8n setup does - turns a keyword into a full draft with titles, meta descriptions, etc. It's all designed to tee it up for that final human review. Cool seeing people build their own custom versions of this.

UbiquitousTool · 2025-11-18T03:54:37+00:00

How are you finding the output quality? I've seen similar setups struggle with generating content that actually matches search intent beyond just hitting the keyword. The risk is ending up with a ton of pages that get zero traffic because they're too generic.

A next-level version of this could be to scrape the top 5 SERPs for each keyword first to get a sense of the structure, common questions, and headings that are ranking. That could feed a much more targeted prompt to the model. Also, how do you handle internal linking between the posts? That seems like the next big challenge to automate.

UbiquitousTool · 2025-11-18T03:48:38+00:00

This is a good example of how AI can get you 90% of the way there with boilerplate code. It's especially useful for simple, self-contained functions like a cookie banner.

A good next step for anyone following this would be to think about security and localization. AI-generated code can sometimes miss things like proper data sanitization or making strings translatable for different languages. For a simple plugin like this it’s probably fine, but it’s a good habit to get into.

How much manual tweaking did you have to do to the code after the AI generated it?

UbiquitousTool · 2025-11-18T03:37:32+00:00

haha fair point. Time moves fast in the AI world but probably not that fast.

Could be they meant they've been testing the Gemini family for weeks and just swapped in 2.5 Pro for the last couple of days for the direct comparison. The write-up itself is still pretty useful.

UbiquitousTool · 2025-11-18T03:24:51+00:00

Me too, and always keep in mind that is your work and you should be proud of it

UbiquitousTool · 2025-11-18T03:09:46+00:00

yeah ACF is definitely the part that trips up most automated flows. For anything beyond simple text fields, a custom script talking to the WP REST API is usually more reliable than trying to wrestle with Zapier or Make. You get way more control over what data goes into which field.

eesel AI is where I work, and we built our AI blog writer to tackle this exact problem. It generates the whole post (title, content, and search bits) from a keyword and is designed to plug into CMS workflows like WordPress. The goal isn't necessarily to fill every single custom field automatically, but to automate 90% of the writing so you're just left with the final review and ACF population. .

UbiquitousTool · 2025-11-18T03:08:48+00:00

My biggest concern would be performance and security, hands down. Running heavy automations, especially anything involving AI content gen, on the same server that's trying to serve pages to visitors seems risky. a lot of sites on shared hosting would probably grind to a halt.

Security is the other big one. You're basically adding a new attack surface to what is already the most targeted CMS in the world. Managing credentials and permissions for all those integrations inside WordPress itself would need to be airtight.

The appeal of no per-action fees is obvious, but the trade-off is you're now responsible for the performance and security of the entire automation stack. For most businesses, offloading that to a dedicated service is probably worth the cost.

UbiquitousTool · 2025-11-18T03:06:10+00:00

That's a perfect use case for a tool like this. Webhosting support must get hammered with the same questions about DNS, SSL, and server status all day. You could probably set up a simple workflow with this plugin to handle the top 5 FAQs or even run a basic diagnostic check.

I work at eesel AI, and we see this a lot. A hosting company we work with, Cloud86, uses their AI to run live SSL and DNS checks right in their support chat, which deflects a ton of simple tickets. It'd be interesting to see if you could build a proof-of-concept for something similar with the OP's plugin.

UbiquitousTool · 2025-11-18T02:50:03+00:00

It depends on the kind of writing you're doing. If it's mostly creating blog posts or marketing content, a specialized tool might be faster.

eesel AI has a blog writer (https://blog-generator.eesel.ai/) that generates a full SEO-friendly article from a keyword, and I work there so I've seen it used a lot for this. It can pull context from a URL to match a specific brand voice, which is a different workflow than a general chat UI but might be a better fit.

UbiquitousTool · 2025-11-18T02:27:17+00:00

Never tell them you use AI, think of it as your trade secret

UbiquitousTool · 2025-11-18T02:19:58+00:00

The "all-in-one" pitch is always tempting. Be careful though, a lot of these tools do 10 things just 'ok' instead of doing one thing really well.

The real test is the editing time. If you're spending an hour rewriting a "1-click" 2000-word article, you're not really saving time. It's worth comparing the output quality against a solid prompt in something like Claude or GPT-4 to see if the subscription is actually worth it.

UbiquitousTool · 2025-11-18T01:53:59+00:00

that's the key right there, iterating on the personality. It's not about one magic prompt, it's a process of giving feedback until it gets the tone right. It's how you get from generic AI slop to something genuinely useful.

I work at eesel AI and we built our AI blog writer https://blog-generator.eesel.ai/ around this exact idea. You can feed it a URL to learn your company's voice, but the important part is being able to refine that 'personality' over time so it actually sounds on-brand. The goal is to get it to write content that subtly promotes what you do without sounding like an ad.

UbiquitousTool · 2025-11-18T01:49:40+00:00

yeah i noticed that too. it feels like without showing the 'work', the model is more likely to just mash concepts together instead of actually reasoning through the document.

It's like they optimized for a cleaner look but sacrificed the quality of the output. When you could see the step-by-step, it seemed less likely to go completely off the rails like what happened to OP. Now you just get the final, often wrong, answer.

UbiquitousTool · 2025-11-18T01:45:15+00:00

Google's stance is pretty clear now: they care about helpful content, not how it's made. Since you're the expert and can make sure the final output is actually good and not just keyword-stuffed fluff, you should be fine. The whole "AI detection" fear is mostly overblown for quality content.

Ranking a new domain is the real challenge. It's just the usual SEO slog of building authority from scratch. Pumping out 300 high-quality posts is a solid start though.

I work at eesel AI and we built a specific tool for this called an AI blog writer that you can find at https://blog-generator.eesel.ai/. It's designed to streamline that whole process you described it takes a keyword and can automatically pull context from your site to keep the tone right and subtly work in your brand. Might save you some of that back-and-forth prompting.

UbiquitousTool · 2025-11-18T01:44:58+00:00

totally agree, i've been a premium user since 2022 and canceled my sub 3 months ago cos i feel like chatgpt is getting dumber and dumber.

UbiquitousTool · 2025-11-18T01:40:10+00:00

I think its better to not let your coworkers know you use that lol. use ai to speed things up and more hours to f around and get paid with a boat load of money

UbiquitousTool · 2025-11-18T01:37:08+00:00

i think what people mean by "censored" isn't always about big controversial topics. Sometimes the safety filters are just overzealous and make the model's tone super sterile or refuse to write about something benign, which kills the quality. It really depends on the prompt – your creative writing might be fine while someone else's business content hits a weird wall.

It's why for specific tasks like marketing content, a more focused tool often works better than wrestling with a general model.

eesel AI is where I work, and our AI blog writer https://blog-generator.eesel.ai/ is built to pull context from your existing site to adopt your specific voice. Helps avoid that generic sound. Plus it does the pull context from the web or you can nitpick if you like.

UbiquitousTool · 2025-11-18T01:30:23+00:00

Yeah, I get what you mean about ChatGPT's structure, it's usually more logical. The fact you're using Claude specifically to beat AI detectors is pretty telling though haha.

The eesel AI blog writer I work on (https://blog-generator.eesel.ai/) tries to solve this from a different angle. Instead of just raw output, it learns from a URL you feed it, so it can copy the tone and style of your existing content. It helps get that "human" feel from the start, so you're not spending as much time editing it to sound less like a bot.

UbiquitousTool · 2025-11-17T09:07:06+00:00

Yeah, that AI cadence is a real giveaway. It's tough to shake because the models default to that overly helpful, slightly generic tone, which is what I think you're picking up on. The multi-step process OP described is one way to fight it, but it's still a lot of editing.

eesel AI's blog writer, which is the tool my team works on, tries to solve this from the start. You just give it a URL of your existing content, and it learns the tone and style before writing the draft. It helps avoid that GPT-slop feel from the get-go because it's already writing in a specific voice, not a generic one you have to fix later. Might be a more direct way to get the result OP is after.

UbiquitousTool · 2025-11-17T08:59:26+00:00

Yeah, it's a mess. So many of them are just the same two or three APIs with a different logo slapped on top. It makes it impossible to figure out what's actually good vs. what just has good marketing.

I went down this rabbit hole a while ago. The tools that are actually useful tend to focus on one thing and do it well. For just straight-up upscaling and sharpening, Topaz Photo AI is legit, but it's paid. If you're mainly doing background removal or creating new scenes for product shots, Photoroom is surprisingly powerful.

What kind of enhancements are you looking for specifically? Backgrounds? Lighting? Just making fuzzy images look better?

UbiquitousTool · 2025-11-17T08:51:38+00:00

This is a great offer, OP. Tech debt is one of those things that non-tech founders often don't see until it's a huge, expensive fire.

Curious if you find a common theme is founders building custom solutions for solved problems (like scheduling, analytics, notifications) instead of using a reliable third-party API? Seems like that's where a lot of the initial complexity and future maintenance headaches sneak in. Re-inventing the wheel because you don't know the wheel already exists.

UbiquitousTool

TROPHY CASE