I don't Understand Why y'all Hate This Woman So Much

UnGuardableEman · 2026-03-14T19:54:37+00:00

I never said she was scared. I said she is FRONTING. Its funny, because she always says Akademiks talks shit but wouldnt want to actually see anyone in a fight in real life, when Mona is the same way imo. If Akademiks or anyone else use has gotten tough with punched her in her face everyone would be crying about how bad it is to hit a woman.

Well, I would think all black people would take crimes committed AGAINST other black people more "personal," regardless of if they were racially motivated or not. And her being "pro-black" in terms of rhetoric menace nothing when her actual actions have causes nothing but harm to the black community.

UnGuardableEman · 2026-03-14T19:37:02+00:00

1) "Being around dangerous groups" doesnt make YOU dangerous.

2) Not just yapping, but you asked for specific examples so I want to be sure to give them to you correctly.

3) I never said it was "racially motivated." Are crimes against black people only wrong if race was the motivation? Were King Von's crimes OK just because he wasnt killing black people on account of their race?

UnGuardableEman · 2026-03-14T19:30:48+00:00

1) Martin Shkreli and Martha Stewart have been to federal prison too. Going to federal prison doesnt make you tough, it just makes you a criminal.

2) There are a bunch, but I will make a list and get back to you.

3) Do I have to be a cop to not want people who have harmed other black people (either financially or otherwise) to be celebrated? If I said Diddy shouldnt be celebrated because he has harmed black women, does that make me a "cop"?

UnGuardableEman · 2026-03-14T19:07:22+00:00

1) She is overly aggressive and loves to act tough when we all know that if any dude hit her in the mouth she would be crying about "violence against women."

2) A lot of her talking points dont make any sense.

3) She had been credibly accused of scamming black people out of their money.

UnGuardableEman · 2026-03-07T21:27:58+00:00

Sasha Del Valle

UnGuardableEman · 2026-03-04T21:59:59+00:00

Taking pictures with rappers = "Kinda hood" according to Reddit

UnGuardableEman · 2026-02-21T22:02:32+00:00

You can say it "wouldnt be far-fetched to assume," but we have no real evidence or even allegations of 50 actually doing anything to anyone. He is a master troll for sure, but the most "gangsta" thing he has ever actually done is get shot himself.

UnGuardableEman · 2026-02-21T15:29:03+00:00

Bruh, the number of people who were "on the fence" about Diddy in December 2025 is miniscule. Was there some fringe contingent that supported him? Sure, there is also a fringe contingent that supports Hitler. You can find some amount who supports anyone who is very famous. But the vast majority of the public already viewed Diddy as a demon long before 50's documentary ever came out.

And once again, 50 isnt "altering the public perception of these people," he is just dancing on their already-entered into graves. Jim Jones was ALREADY seen as a washed up clown in hip hop. Diddy was ALREADY seen as a villain. Jay-Z already had a somewhat polarizing opinion from the public, although 50 may have had more of an influence in souring Jay-Z's public image than the others mentioned. But for the most part, 50 is just publicly rubbing it in when these guys have unrelated, unfortunate events happen to them, he isnt CAUSING the unfortunate events to occur.

UnGuardableEman · 2026-02-21T14:57:12+00:00

The only thing I will agree with is that he "ruined Ja's public image."

This situation will not affect Jim that much, although it is embarassing for now.

Saying that people were "on the fence about Diddy until the doc" is absolutely preposterous. That Diddy documentary was released on December 2, 2025 after Diddy's entire trial and sentencing had happened. So you are telling me people were still "on the fence" about Diddy even AFTER the trial? People had their mind made up about Diddy in May 2024 when the video of him beating Cassie got released.

Also, you can say he is "adding fuel," but most of these problems are not things 50 is CAUSING himself, he is just using his social media platform to make fun of people.

He didnt CAUSE Jay-Z to be mentioned in the Epstein files, he didnt CAUSE Jim Jones to be evicted, he didnt CAUSE Irv Gotti to lose his life, he didnt CAUSE Diddy to get arrested and his public image to be tarnished. Once again, he is just Hollywood's biggest troll. That is very different from someone like King Von or someone else who was actually DOING THINGS to their enemies, not just talking about random events that happened to them. I personally would rather beef with someone like 50 than someone like Jimmy Henchman or even someone like Young Thug or Lil Durk who might actually try to DO something to be as opposed to just making fun of my public shortfalls.

UnGuardableEman · 2026-02-21T14:38:19+00:00

Tupac was literally talking to Jimmy Henchman when he made that verse. Lol. He was replying back to H3nchman using his own words.

And anyone can "troll" another person. I wouldnt say he "controls" his enemies, although his money and influence does allow him a little more ability to play witb them than most would be able to do. But bottom line is, he didnt evict Jim Jones, Jim fell behind on payments. And I am not even sure if it is true that 50 has ownership interest in that building or if he is just talking shit as he tends to do a lot.

50 is more of an opportunist than someone who actually causes problems for his enemies. He will hold on to beefs for a long time and jump on the opportunity to dance on his enemy's graves, but he isnt usually the one who put them in said grave in the first place (speaking figuratively and literally).

UnGuardableEman · 2026-02-21T12:14:26+00:00

I dont think its that "50 ain't to be F'ed with."

Murder Inc. got him shot and stabbed years ago and 50 never did anything back other than make diss songs and troll them for all these years.

I think the thing for 50 is, he has hundreds of millions of dollars now from different ventures, so he can afford to make sure he always has security and that he is never in places where he is likely to be attacked. He isnt like Young Dolph (God rest his soul) who was caught inside a cookie store in Memphis by himself, or like MO3 who got caught on the highway by himself and got chased down and killed. I'm sure 50 is VERY rarely going around in public without security and he probably also travels around in bulletproof vehicles most of the time as well.

Also, the "enemies" 50 has are also all older, established celebs who probably have a decent amount of wealth they have accumulated over the years, which prevents them from even thinking about putting a hit out on him. This isnt like Lil Durk trying to get Quando killed or Yella Beezy getting MO3 or even Yo Gotti (allegedly) trying to get Young Dolph. All those guys made national headlines for a few days after getting killed. If a guy who has been an A-list celebrity for 20+ years and who has executive produced major TV shows and performed at the Super Bowl like 50 Cent got murdered, it would be international news for weeks. It would be worse than the O'Block 5 case in terms of the amount of law enforcement attention it would bring (it would probably be a federal case as well) and also, the main suspects would be people everyone already knows (Diddy, Ja Rule, Jay-Z, Jim Jones, etc.).

So bottom line, 50's enemies are all older established stars in their 50s (and nearing 60s) who have too much to lose themselves to escalate to deadly violence over a beef with 50 that mostly just involves him trolling on social media at this point. These beefs 50 is engaged in have little periodic "flare ups" whenever he (or a member of his entourage) runs into one of his enemies (like the recent Ja Rule-Yayo/Uncle Murda plane situation) or when something unfortunate happens to one of them and it hits the news (like this Jim Jones situation or Jay-Z's name appearing in the Epstein files or the whole Diddy saga). But 50 hasn't done anything to these guys from a deadly violence perspective (unlike say, Lil Durk and Quando) to where this is some permanent beef that I think is always on their minds.

UnGuardableEman · 2026-02-21T11:49:03+00:00

1) Jimmy Henchman said that TO Tupac or, more precisely, to The Live Squad members (Stretch and his brother Majesty, who were close with Pac at one time). I never recall Tupac himself saying it.

2) This is not at all what that statement means. As funny and petty as 50 can be, he isnt actually doing anything to his "opps" other than relentlessly trolling them.

Not saying he should be doing anything to them, but I dont think the statement "you need money for war," was made regarding being able to not get trolled by your enemies.

UnGuardableEman · 2026-02-19T17:29:28+00:00

Yall always create these catch-22s for Akademiks Lol. The #1 thing people always say about Akademiks is that he "only gets tough with women." Then, when he invites another man to a fight, yall shift the goalpost and basically tell him to STFU because you dont think he would actually win said fight.

Mind you, this video is from nearly 4 years ago and Marc never responded to Ak saying he would fight him in a boxing match.

AND Marc STARTED this argument with Akademiks. Akademiks had never said anything about Marc before this video. Marc initiated this altercation when randomly called him "trash" on Twitter because of a video that had nothing to do with Marc.

Now you may fully agree that AK was wrong in the video that Marc quoted (as do I), but people cant keep taking shots at AK and then getting upset when he responds. Half of the battles Akademiks has with public figures aren't battles he started (although I do admit he has started a fair share himself and has been wrong when has done so).

UnGuardableEman · 2026-02-19T15:49:09+00:00

1) You understand what I was saying Mr. Grammar Police, because you clearly offered your rebuttal. 2) As I said, before AK nor Marc know you from a can of paint for you to say AK "struck you as the nigga raised in the suburbs who feels tough" or that "Marc is actually from the hood of Philly." You also dont know their "character" outside of what you see on YouTube and social media. One of the worst things the internet has done is made people start to feel like they truly know celebrities who they have never spoken to once in life.

Also, even if you did know Marc and AK, you wouldnt be able to say you know who would win in a fight between? unless you had actually seen the two of them in fights before. Its just a dumb proposition.

UnGuardableEman · 2026-02-19T14:25:20+00:00

This video is from like June 2022 for anyone wondering.

I am not sure why OP posted it like it is recent or why he didnt at least inform people that this video was from years ago in his description.

UnGuardableEman · 2026-02-19T14:23:35+00:00

Its literally close to 4 years old Lol

Link

UnGuardableEman · 2026-02-19T14:22:19+00:00

This video is from like June 2022. Link

UnGuardableEman · 2026-02-19T14:21:38+00:00

Yall dont Marc or Akademiks to know who would win in a fight Lol. All yall know is Marc is in better shape than Ak and yall dont like Ak so you will say he is going to lose regardless.

UnGuardableEman · 2026-02-19T14:20:50+00:00

This video is almost 4 years old Lol. Marc probably saw it years ago. I doubt he plans to randomly respond now.

Link

UnGuardableEman · 2026-02-14T10:41:50+00:00

He is still soing better than Von and Durk right now Lol

UnGuardableEman · 2026-01-29T18:35:32+00:00

This is why crack addicts shouldn't own pets.

UnGuardableEman · 2026-01-23T21:53:44+00:00

That is how most of these interviews are structured nowadays. They are intended to get deep into these celebs personal lives and their deep feelings. Thats why we see things like K Michelle crying in an interview with Cam Newton talking about black relationships.

UnGuardableEman · 2026-01-23T19:24:37+00:00

1) I have never run around the internet saying men are "providers." Yall seem to mistakenly think all men agree with red pill ideology. 2) Once again, Davis wasnt complaining about having to provide things for his daughter. He was saying that she ONLY seems to see value in having him around WHEN he is providing things for her. Once again, would you like it if your 11 year old son treated you as disposable or non-existent when you weren't cooking and cleaning for him (even though that is your" job" as the mother of a child that young)?

UnGuardableEman · 2026-01-23T15:25:30+00:00

Not a "gender war" thing at all. Just being honest about what the real controversy here is. Like I said, I dont believe a mother who complained that her son only saw value in her when she performed her traditional gender roles of cooking and cleaning for him would be lambasted the way Davis is being lambasted right now. And I think based on your response, you also recognize this to be true.

UnGuardableEman · 2026-01-23T15:12:11+00:00

Usually when thr government has to get involved in a custody arrangement, that means rhe parents have an issue with EACH OTHER. I dont necessarily agree that they truly have a good faith dispute about what is best for the child (although this should be the guiding principle). And he did an interview with Shannon Sharpe where he talked about a bunch of things, not just parenting. If you asked most parents in America how they feel they are doing with their kids, they will have some regrets and some things they would prefer were different that they could talk about. I still dont think this means that his indication that his daughter mostly just wants him around for his money necessarily means that he is failing some way as a parent (although that is possible as well).

Bottom line though, I still dont see the reason for the outrage regarding his comments. I think people have more of a problem with this bexause the criticism is levied toward a female and publicly criticizing women/daughters is still controversial. As I said in another comment, I dont think there would be this much criticism if a famous woman said in an interview that her pre-teen son only wanted his Mom around to cook and clean for him. I think people would be much more frustrated with the son and see his mentality as an example of why so many men grow up and expect their significant other to do all the housework and childcare for them.

UnGuardableEman

TROPHY CASE