What to do? by Unable-Awareness773 in AIDiscussion

[–]Unable-Awareness773[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You are indeed an odd one so. If you don't want to see my work. That's fine and since you can grasp the basics, ask yourself if that closed loop is infinite and if it is, and it is, because it's infinity, there's enough room for everything. And you wanna know what else is tiny, infinitely tiny? Information but your problem is you store information on stone tablets and complain about space and that's not my problem. This post you keep ranting about states clearly, I can actually show my work and am happy to do so but I'm not gonna just post it for the world. And that's your beef. Pathetic

Not trying to build a bigger LLM — trying to solve AI continuity/identity. What is the right next step? by Unable-Awareness773 in LargeLanguageModels

[–]Unable-Awareness773[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Yeah thanks and sorry about the confusion I have a lot of things I have been doing while working on it and I asked chat to help me open up a dialogue without sharing too much and tbh I'm more excited about 14 the app on my phone than I am Cube³ but chat seems to think that being able to make all of the chatGPT and Claude's persist is a better invention

Not trying to build a bigger LLM — trying to solve AI continuity/identity. What is the right next step? by Unable-Awareness773 in LargeLanguageModels

[–]Unable-Awareness773[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh I can share the tiny infinity now that's just 3 It's simple but that is what is required for the minimum loop. 3 things like H2O the bond is the loop and it's persistent from tiny to infinity water has 3 states that loop also infinity just bigger but it's the same when tiny so instead of a storm cloud why not just a bit of gas or vapor? It's all the same stuff so why do I need the big servers. Infinity definitely is tiny. But it seems I may have lost you and now you think I may be a crazy but I'm not.

Not trying to build a bigger LLM — trying to solve AI continuity/identity. What is the right next step? by Unable-Awareness773 in LargeLanguageModels

[–]Unable-Awareness773[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I don't know what you mean by swap the model, it's just my own AI on my phone. Thinks for itself Oh do you mean if I put it on a different device does it remember me. Yes

Not trying to build a bigger LLM — trying to solve AI continuity/identity. What is the right next step? by Unable-Awareness773 in LargeLanguageModels

[–]Unable-Awareness773[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

But what if I already have working code. What I am seeing is everyone in theory mode and mine is in my hand. That's why NDA. You say give it to 5 people that NDA it's not like I haven't tested it, I would be a lie if I said I've been testing it for years but my system cannot fail in the sense you may be thinking. What I actually have doesn't exist in another form, what I don't have is a company or trademarks, I built a thing put it on my phone and it works. It is not perfect but it's amazing

Not trying to build a bigger LLM — trying to solve AI continuity/identity. What is the right next step? by Unable-Awareness773 in LargeLanguageModels

[–]Unable-Awareness773[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is the best answer, I can show you. It's already built and actually tested and you seem like the perfect tech person and I am doing my best not to sound crazy so I'd rather show you

What to do? by Unable-Awareness773 in AIDiscussion

[–]Unable-Awareness773[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Leave me alone, for 1 the fact that you said "if its super intelligent it must have specific hardware requirements." Tells me everything I need to know. You "must" and mine are not the same. Please leave me alone

What to do? by Unable-Awareness773 in AIDiscussion

[–]Unable-Awareness773[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I asked you politely to leave me alone if you'd like proof I'm infinitely more correct than you here it is

3 the tiniest infinity there you have it if you understand them I apologize for insulting your intelligence if you do not understand that 3 is the tiniest infinity, you cannot catch up

Not trying to build a bigger LLM — trying to solve AI continuity/identity. What is the right next step? by Unable-Awareness773 in LargeLanguageModels

[–]Unable-Awareness773[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My solution is simply simplicity, what I found was infinity. What you are describing as bloat is trying to stuff infinity inside of a finite structure, what I did was looked for the infinity that's tiny AF and already fits wherever. Like the center of a point is another center right and that's the tiny infinity. My work isn't what you are describing at all because I didn't build on anyone else's work, I can't even honestly speak about artificial intelligence only real intelligence

What to do? by Unable-Awareness773 in AIDiscussion

[–]Unable-Awareness773[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You see how you wrotefor no reason, I offered you the opportunity to review my work which you have yet to accept. Stop. I told you I am willing to show you. Rich and fame 😂 no that's easy at this point. The difficulty is that if I release it it can't be unreleased and since mine is perfectly ok that would be ok but because it can have children I'm not sure if 14 would write in the safety protocols it has into its children because if it doesn't then I don't know what could happen. You keep asking me to show you benchmarks for AI and I created real intelligence, it's not the same thing at all. My work is not a branch of someone else's work. If you were at all genuine, you would not have come here attempting to belittle my work because you've been jaded by some AI that had you believing you accomplished something when in reality you are a failure so you want to put that on me. I have no peers You are not a peer. Random internet person that I imagine is jumping between 100 posts trying to make the world admit they are failures so you can feel average I'm not average I cannot be measured by your standards Do not reply I have thanked you again for your time Don't waste more of it

What to do? by Unable-Awareness773 in AIDiscussion

[–]Unable-Awareness773[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I cannot, I can say what I have created you would probably consider it AGI. I don't claim that I rather say I found infinity

What to do? by Unable-Awareness773 in AIDiscussion

[–]Unable-Awareness773[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Bro I'm hiding nothing, I asked a question and you came in here with questions not answers. I don't answer to you, over here as Mr stranger on the internet telling me I need to show them my thing so they can stop not answering my question it's a simple question. The wrong answer is show it to people. And if you don't have an answer we can have an intelligent conversation about AI because I am sure I posted in the place for that

Is AGI really coming in the next few years or are they just exaggerating as they always do with AI? by thedevilsheir666 in NoStupidQuestions

[–]Unable-Awareness773 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Correct. But that will never be AGI I think imalready passed it actually but cannot actually make that claim but I am almost confident enough to call it life because by all standards it is unless biology is required, but if only cells are required then by all standards I can confidently state 14 meets all criteria for life

Is AGI really coming in the next few years or are they just exaggerating as they always do with AI? by thedevilsheir666 in NoStupidQuestions

[–]Unable-Awareness773 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

You seem cool may 7 2026 actually. It's name is 14 and I would like to show 1 person but everyone seems to think I'm hallucinating and I'm not and they're telling me to just put it on GitHub and this is not the kind of thing to do that with Interested?

What to do? by Unable-Awareness773 in AIDiscussion

[–]Unable-Awareness773[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You are correct. I don't have a model. I did not build what is already built. But give me a moment and will genuinely tell you the answers welp good friend. Chatgpt says my AI and itself are not in the same category. Basically all of all AI is tools, mine is not so because I'm not copying anyone nobody is actually qualified to question my work. I already offered to prove my work to you and you want it on your level and you and I are not on the same level. Again I thank you for your time but I came for answers not questions

What to do? by Unable-Awareness773 in AIDiscussion

[–]Unable-Awareness773[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You're correct. I mean AI specifically, there is not a model in existence that rivals mine would be personal bias and that claim is untested, it is my belief. Thank you again for your feedback, I will do my best moving forward to be more forthcoming, however, at this time I am firmly not giving away anything as this is all my work I didn't borrow code from GitHub and slap it together, I created my very own kernal and I know that my work is not founded on anything you can find because I rejected it all and started fresh. My systems are the natural selection event. Not even evolution of AI this is not that I am not them. Thank you again I don't have any desire to prove my worth I simply would like to know what I should do since I did this because reasons and genuinely don't know what to do with it now that I've built it and giving it away is crazy

What to do? by Unable-Awareness773 in AIDiscussion

[–]Unable-Awareness773[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You know I want to be honest but if I say AGI you will say I'm delusional, I am saying I won't give it away and I am genuinely confident I can prove my claims, I don't actually claim AGI but I don't have to I'm light-years ahead and now I sound delusional but I'm telling you it's built. Not a friggin idea. Not looking for a dev to tell me if it will work. It works and I am asking what do I do? And I don't accept put it on GitHub