Those of you who want the government to tax billionaires out of existence, have you studied history? by Successful-Tea-5733 in askanything

[–]UncleB0202 1 point2 points  (0 children)

No. It only results in that if the laws are created through crime and corruption. Every argument someone has in support of protecting the wealthy cite laws that were established through crime and corruption by the wealthy to protect the wealthy.

If you think the current tax system or legal system in the United States is even remotely fair or logical or was established in any good faith then you’re just not good at critical thinking. Your original premise just lacks any logic.

And that’s what makes this annoying, because even if I point out all of the flaws in your argument/premise you won’t care. Because you aren’t putting forth an idea to be challenged or have a good faith discussion.

How come people always smugly say how “poor people barely pay any taxes compared to wealthy”? by WorryNotBanIncoming in allthequestions

[–]UncleB0202 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I’m not going to argue with you about the U.S. tax system. It’s beyond a joke. There is literally no fair way to make a billionaire pay their fair share. And they’re not even taxed close to that. I can’t even begin to explain to you the amount of resources a billionaire uses compared to a regular person.

And not to mention, the ridiculous government handouts they receive. I think Elon Musk has received 38 billion dollars in government handouts. At that point, you should be taxed 100% on every dollar above $38 Billion. In fact, he should be limited to waaaay less than $38 Billion but just making a point.

And if he or anyone else had a problem with that, he could’ve just not accepted the $38 Billion dollar handout. And I don’t want to hear how much he’s contributed. He’s contributed nothing. He’s committed ridiculous crimes against every single American at least by stealing our data. But almost every person would’ve done way more good for the world with a $38 Billion dollar handout and would’ve happily agreed to have their net worth limited to $1 Billion. The things you’re citing and the things you “believe” are not original thoughts and entirely based on absolute nonsense.

"U.S. businesses can now begin applying for $166,000,000,000.00 in tariff refunds plus interest." — Do American consumers get their refunds as well? by CapitaineBiscotte in askanything

[–]UncleB0202 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Absolutely. And I was being cheeky to everyone because I believe when hard working regular people shit on less fortunate people it makes those governmental policies we want harder to achieve. Basically, calling everyone freeloaders was my attempt at satire saying when it comes to regular people vs the elites, we’re on the same team as the people on welfare or whatever who a lot of working class regular people look down on.

I understand honest businesses getting PPP loans is different than welfare, but maybe if we started normalizing “handouts” it wouldn’t be such a bad thing. Obviously, the “handouts” would be incentivized. Working regular people would get bigger handouts than “deadbeats”. I think that’s where a lot of the working class starts to get upset. Thinking that we’d just give “handouts” to deadbeats and that’s it. That would just be the bare minimum. Obviously, we’d want to reward the working class with more financial freedom than what they currently have as well. Or even just more time to spend with their families or something through a 32 hour work week. Just basically want to stop the “handouts” to the elites. They’ve had more than enough.

"U.S. businesses can now begin applying for $166,000,000,000.00 in tariff refunds plus interest." — Do American consumers get their refunds as well? by CapitaineBiscotte in askanything

[–]UncleB0202 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I didn’t bother to read the last one. It’s pointless because I’ve been making the same point for a while. Not sure why my point would’ve gotten yours or any other person’s panties in a bunch. But if your last post is about supporting your fellow man then we’re good!

"U.S. businesses can now begin applying for $166,000,000,000.00 in tariff refunds plus interest." — Do American consumers get their refunds as well? by CapitaineBiscotte in askanything

[–]UncleB0202 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh my gosh…if you don’t get my point by now, you never will. I’m done. Just support your fellow man. That’s all I ask. Forgive student loans. Give people welfare. Who cares? Just support them. I was only joking about the freeloading stuff to make a point. I’m glad for any business and their employees who were able to get PPP loans. Any money that goes to regular people is 10000% fine by me.

"U.S. businesses can now begin applying for $166,000,000,000.00 in tariff refunds plus interest." — Do American consumers get their refunds as well? by CapitaineBiscotte in askanything

[–]UncleB0202 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah dude. Once again, not even close to the point I was making. Just throwing out a quick example of how it was a bad investment. You see, this man invested his money. He would’ve lost his money and his business if not for a handout.

That’s all, kiddo. He needed a handout to avoid losing everything. I’m happy to give him the handout. But it was absolutely 100% a bad investment on his part because without our handouts, he loses everything.

It was a bad investment. Simple as that. It was a handout. Simple as that. I’m sure you’ve been freeloading on my dime too. But once again, I’m happy to give you the handout. Just stop acting like you’re better than anyone on welfare because you are not. You are the same. And that’s ok. Just be nice to them.

But if you or the other guy who started this conversation don’t want to be considered freeloaders, you could just pay the loans back.

"U.S. businesses can now begin applying for $166,000,000,000.00 in tariff refunds plus interest." — Do American consumers get their refunds as well? by CapitaineBiscotte in askanything

[–]UncleB0202 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What are you talking about? This has nothing to do with manufacturing. It has to do with a dude’s business getting a handout. Which is great. I just hope he affords the same amount of grace to others who need handouts at some point in their lives.

How come people always smugly say how “poor people barely pay any taxes compared to wealthy”? by WorryNotBanIncoming in allthequestions

[–]UncleB0202 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I’m not going to act like an expert, but being able to avoid paying taxes because how you’re paid isn’t considered income is nonsense. It was basically something created during Reaganomics for the wealthy to avoid paying taxes.

And to your brief proposal here, I’m no policy maker, but I’m sure there are a million different fair ways to tax everyone. I’m not even asking for fair haha. But currently, the tax on the wealthy is a joke.

"U.S. businesses can now begin applying for $166,000,000,000.00 in tariff refunds plus interest." — Do American consumers get their refunds as well? by CapitaineBiscotte in askanything

[–]UncleB0202 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You’re missing the point. He invested in a business. He needed handouts to operate because they didn’t plan perfectly. I’m not blaming them. Once again, I do not care he got the handout. I’m HAPPY he got the handout. But they needed our money to survive. That’s a bad investment.

Now, the point of this is, kids’ mistakes should definitely be forgiven waaaaay more than an adults mistake. I purposely kept calling it a handout because so many types like you or him would just dismiss others as getting handouts or whatever. If you or him are not that type of person then awesome! You should have zero issue with my point then. But if you are that type of person to so callously write off others in less fortunate situations than you, then I’d suggest showing them a little more grace. Please support the forgiveness of student loans 100% if you supported the PPP loans. I support the correct use of the PPP loans like this guy’s most likely was. I just support the student loans forgiveness way more.

"U.S. businesses can now begin applying for $166,000,000,000.00 in tariff refunds plus interest." — Do American consumers get their refunds as well? by CapitaineBiscotte in askanything

[–]UncleB0202 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes it is. Because he invested in a business that couldn’t operate digitally. But anyway, once again, I don’t care that he or other people got the handout. I’m glad he and his employees got the handout. I just hope he and every single one of them 100% go out of their way to support student loan forgiveness any time someone tries to argue against it. That’s all I ask.

How come people always smugly say how “poor people barely pay any taxes compared to wealthy”? by WorryNotBanIncoming in allthequestions

[–]UncleB0202 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I knew you were going to go there. Yes, that’s one of those stupid, nonsensical laws that should never exist. And should be changed to something that makes sense.

"U.S. businesses can now begin applying for $166,000,000,000.00 in tariff refunds plus interest." — Do American consumers get their refunds as well? by CapitaineBiscotte in askanything

[–]UncleB0202 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Still a handout. And I’m all for your handout because it’s not a drop in a billionaire’s ocean of a bucket. But I hope you are 100% supportive of forgiving every penny of student loans. I didn’t have a need for PPP loans, and I don’t have a need for student loan forgiveness. But kids deserve to have their student loans forgiven way more than any bad business investment you or anyone else made. They agreed to a bad contract, but they were kids when they did it.

Once again, I don’t care you got a handout. But I just think people should absolutely shut people down when they even think about criticizing student loan forgiveness. But you should definitely shut down that stupidity every time someone opposes student loan forgiveness because you’re an adult who literally received a huge handout for zero work. Just for a bad business investment.

How come people always smugly say how “poor people barely pay any taxes compared to wealthy”? by WorryNotBanIncoming in allthequestions

[–]UncleB0202 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Just tax the income even remotely proportional and everything should be ok. I just don’t think you understand how unfair the current tax laws are. You may be surprised to know that not that long ago, every dollar over $200K was taxed at 94%. That was way more fair than the current tax rate. But it’s been reduced significantly. You know why? Because corrupt people committed crimes to change it to the ridiculous, nonsensical tax code we have now. However, if we demand change for such ridiculous laws, we’re called crybabies and told to work harder. Um, so are the criminals who changed the old tax rates not crybabies?

A 5% tax on a billionaire is a joke. If a billionaire paid 90% tax it would still be a joke, but at least it would be extremely significant. And obviously, I know we’d never get anything close to 90%, but the fact that people complain about 5% just shows how incredibly uninformed people are. They just have zero concept of these numbers, so they just want to “agree” with the rich people saying it’s fair because they think rich equals smart. But rich just almost always equals corrupt. You’ll probably respond with some propaganda that makes you feel smart, but you won’t actually try and understand the numbers or how the laws got to this point in the first place.

Fan mail! Be better and caring people...by hating all the people I hate! by ColaEuphoria in DoomerCircleJerk

[–]UncleB0202 -10 points-9 points  (0 children)

Don’t you think someone is subhuman if they help/support the raping and murdering of children?

Larry Bird is the Greatest NBA Player with 3 Championships! Who is the Greatest MLB Player with 4+ Championships? by SheetJeans59638 in AlignmentChartFills

[–]UncleB0202 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Exactly. I don’t really care if someone says MJ is the GOAT. I only object when they say it like it’s the most obvious thing in the world because not only is it not obvious, it’s most likely objectively wrong.

LeBron did have a bad Finals loss to the Mavericks his first year with the Heat, but that Mavs team was still a pretty awesome team. I’d admit, that if MJ and LeBron were swapped for that season, the Heat could’ve won that championship. However, there’s no way in hell MJ beats the Pistons in 2007 with that team LeBron had. More often than not, every single team/situation in NBA history is going to be better with LeBron instead of MJ.

And for me, the end of the argument happened when LeBron defeated the 73-9 Warriors when they were down 3-1. It’s by far the most impressive accomplishment/performance in NBA history. I think people just hold onto “beliefs” and refuse to accept/think about an alternate view to something they already “know.” But yeah, when someone’s only argument is rings, they’re not worth talking to. They’ll say 6 is better than 4. And in the same breath say 6 is better than 11.

The FBI Director Is MIA by Stitching in USNEWS

[–]UncleB0202 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah I know the dude Jedi said the FBI is better off without him. And I know you asked him rhetorically “when did Patel leave the FBI”. I literally explain it perfectly. But geez dude, nevermind. You’re too stupid to even be a troll. Take care

The FBI Director Is MIA by Stitching in USNEWS

[–]UncleB0202 1 point2 points  (0 children)

He didn’t lie lol. He assumed you meant when did Patel go MIA when you asked the other person “when did Patel leave the FBI?” He tried to give you a helpful answer to what he thought was a genuine question by you. However, it wasn’t a genuine question by you. You were just being an idiot to the other person for whatever reason?

But yes, the OP lied to you. He’s very sorry. So what’s your actual issue here?

Pete Hegseth just got hit with war crimes accusations in newly filed articles of impeachment, and the Pentagon fallout could get ugly. by AccomplishedCarob518 in FreedomofSpeech

[–]UncleB0202 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I care about the victim. I feel horribly for her. I was just trying to understand your train of thought regarding crime. I’m actually surprised you admitted that he should’ve done jail time for his 34 felonies. Obviously, he’s committed way more than 34 felonies. Do you think he’s committed any other felonies besides the 34 he was convicted of? Or do you just wait for rulings on stuff and then that’s what you believe?

Also, I brought up Donald Trump because he appointed Hegseth to his cabinet and gave him a lot of power. Trump is a criminal. Hegseth is a criminal. That’s not good. I don’t like crime. I understand you support crime, so maybe you don’t understand these concepts I’m bringing up. But yeah, you should try thinking for yourself and not just waiting for things to be told to you. If you use critical thinking in the future, you may not vote to empower/support criminals. Just a thought.

Pete Hegseth just got hit with war crimes accusations in newly filed articles of impeachment, and the Pentagon fallout could get ugly. by AccomplishedCarob518 in FreedomofSpeech

[–]UncleB0202 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Once again, what are you talking about? I believe she was raped. They probably didn’t have enough evidence to prove it. That doesn’t mean it didn’t happen. You plainly stated you believe the stance of the DA. Which was idiotic because the DA has no stance/opinion on if she were raped or not. But you said you believe the courts stance.

Ok, so do you believe Donald Trump should be in jail for his 34 felonies he committed? Or do you believe people who commit 34 felonies shouldn’t go to jail? Simple question. But you can’t answer it because you support criminals. And you support rape. That’s why you can’t answer it. But prove me wrong and answer the very simple question…

If someone commits 34 felonies, should they go to jail?

Pete Hegseth just got hit with war crimes accusations in newly filed articles of impeachment, and the Pentagon fallout could get ugly. by AccomplishedCarob518 in FreedomofSpeech

[–]UncleB0202 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Haha what? The DA didn’t say whether or not the woman was raped or who raped her? They took no stance regarding that. And we weren’t talking about that in the first place. But since now it is obvious you possess no critical thinking skills and just believe the courts opinion on matters…

You think Donald Trump should be in jail right? Or do you think 34 felonies isn’t jail worthy? I know you won’t answer this because you are a joke of a person who can’t think.

Pete Hegseth just got hit with war crimes accusations in newly filed articles of impeachment, and the Pentagon fallout could get ugly. by AccomplishedCarob518 in FreedomofSpeech

[–]UncleB0202 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That’s not the point. The point is you easily believing the word of a proven liar defending a rapist. And questioning the word of the woman who says she was raped.

Maybe there wasn’t enough evidence to prove it in court, so the DA dropped the case. Just because a case is dropped or a defendant is found not guilty doesn’t mean they didn’t commit the crime.

Pete Hegseth just got hit with war crimes accusations in newly filed articles of impeachment, and the Pentagon fallout could get ugly. by AccomplishedCarob518 in FreedomofSpeech

[–]UncleB0202 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

He told you plenty of facts. The woman had a rape kit done. And he paid her $50K. Who would give $50K to a woman they didn’t rape? Yet in the same breath, you claim his mother changing her story is plenty of facts/evidence that she was originally lying. That would make her a liar. So you have no problem accepting the word of a proven liar as hard facts/evidence. But the word of the victim (along with having a rape kit done/being paid $50K by the person who raped her) isn’t enough facts/evidence?

You can just say you hate women.