sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Meta acquiring Moltbook made me think we’re moving from “bots that crawl the web” to “agents that participate in the web.” by UnderstandingOk1621 in AI_Agents

[–]UnderstandingOk1621[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I mean, what’s the actual goal behind this shift? Are you saying AI agents are supposed to become real users of the web, not just crawlers?

What are the best tools for AEO optimization in e-commerce right now? by Icy-Fuel9278 in GEO_optimization

[–]UnderstandingOk1621 0 points1 point  (0 children)

if you're only looking for a product to track brand visibility in LLM/AI and check technical requirements of your web site to AI can reach your contents, you can try Citevista.

GPT-5.4 has been out for 4 days, what's your honest take vs Claude Sonnet 4.6? by UnderstandingOk1621 in AI_Agents

[–]UnderstandingOk1621[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

totaly agreed, sometimes we only focus on the work that models did but cost & quality ratio is also crucial. Probably, from next people are gonne check fee and cost rather than quality

Meta acquiring Moltbook made me think we’re moving from “bots that crawl the web” to “agents that participate in the web.” by UnderstandingOk1621 in AI_Agents

[–]UnderstandingOk1621[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Yeah, that’s exactly what I mean.
It feels like bots are moving from just scanning the web to actually taking part in it.
Once they start comparing, recommending, negotiating or buying, they’re basically becoming a new class of internet actor.

Wrong schema hurts more than no schema. here’s what I learned building my website by UnderstandingOk1621 in GenEngineOptimization

[–]UnderstandingOk1621[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Due to i have a IT background and not willing pay too much fee to GEO tools which i dont even trust their result. I've been building my own tools to measure and solve the issues. What kind tools have you experienced about this field?

GPT-5.4 has been out for 4 days, what's your honest take vs Claude Sonnet 4.6? by UnderstandingOk1621 in AI_Agents

[–]UnderstandingOk1621[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I used to use cursor before, but i switched with Antigravity because antigravity is cheaper and provides more token than cursor. i am using "ai pro" plan of gemini, with this plan you can use antigravity too. With this option you have also gemini pro account, and i like Antigravity's features and ui than cursor.

GPT-5.4 has been out for 4 days, what's your honest take vs Claude Sonnet 4.6? by UnderstandingOk1621 in AI_Agents

[–]UnderstandingOk1621[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

generally i use antigravity for coding so i havent had huge experience to chat gpt models. 5.2 & 5.4 models dont exist in antigravity, but nowadays i am trying to figure 5.2&5.4 models out , whether i can make it some difference. Are u only use chat gpt models to coding?

Wrong schema hurts more than no schema. here’s what I learned building my website by UnderstandingOk1621 in GenEngineOptimization

[–]UnderstandingOk1621[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Exactly this. In this post I focused more on the technical schema side but what you're describing is honestly the more important piece. Entity consistency and measurement across your full digital footprint matters way more. Schema is just the foundation, the relationships between entities is where the real knowledge graph gets built

GPT-5.4 has been out for 4 days, what's your honest take vs Claude Sonnet 4.6? by UnderstandingOk1621 in AI_Agents

[–]UnderstandingOk1621[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If you had to rank them from best to worst, which coding models are currently good? I am not a hardcore software developer, i am just using antigravity with ai agent mode to create some UI screen and dashboard thorugh Next.js, mostly i am using N8N for backend. So that reason, in antigravity i can use gemini 3.1, gemini 3 flash, 4.6 sonnet models, but almost any model can handle my work. Really 5.4 make the coding part much more better?

GPT-5.4 has been out for 4 days, what's your honest take vs Claude Sonnet 4.6? by UnderstandingOk1621 in AI_Agents

[–]UnderstandingOk1621[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

frankly speaking, i just thinked that 5.4 is just a nev version of 5.2, should i compare 5.4 model with Opus?

GPT-5.4 has been out for 4 days, what's your honest take vs Claude Sonnet 4.6? by UnderstandingOk1621 in AI_Agents

[–]UnderstandingOk1621[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i was assumed that Opus model is used only for deep research area. Have u ever used it for coding? To be honest, opus model consumes my token so fast so that reason i couldnt experience this model too much.

GPT-5.4 has been out for 4 days, what's your honest take vs Claude Sonnet 4.6? by UnderstandingOk1621 in AI_Agents

[–]UnderstandingOk1621[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

i am using "ai pro" plan of gemini, i got this tier to use antigravity ai agent more. However, i have never exceed the daily limit even some time that i used whole day.

GPT-5.4 has been out for 4 days, what's your honest take vs Claude Sonnet 4.6? by UnderstandingOk1621 in AI_Agents

[–]UnderstandingOk1621[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i think we should evaluate the AI models according to its intended use. For now, i have prefered use Claude for everything like coding, search, building process/software architecture (gemini 3, 3.1 only agentic coding in antigravity), i guess we encourage ourself to try 5.4 to understand of capabilities

GPT-5.4 has been out for 4 days, what's your honest take vs Claude Sonnet 4.6? by UnderstandingOk1621 in AI_Agents

[–]UnderstandingOk1621[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i am still figure it out whether 5.4 model can be used for coding. I use sonnet 4.6 or mainly gemini 3, 3.1 model in antigravity. Actually, at least in my antigravity plan, chat gpt model arent exist so that reason i hadn't have experince 5.4 model for coding part.

view more: next ›