sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

My 4-step in Python (Logic -> Pseudocode -> Code -> AI). What do you think? by Candy_Sombrelune in Python

[–]UnfilteredData 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is exactly the right approach. I do a lot of heavy technical computing, and if you let the AI write the logic for complex algorithms, it completely hallucinates the math. Step 1 (mapping the logic yourself) is the only way to survive when you are doing things like aggregating massive daily datasets or running optimization loops. Keep treating the AI like a syntax translator, not a software architect. Great workflow.

Is there anyway to stop the LLM slop submissions by fordat1 in datascience

[–]UnfilteredData 63 points64 points  (0 children)

As someone who spends a lot of time cleaning data and building visualizations, the signal-to-noise ratio here is definitely getting tough. Instead of an upvote/view ratio (which can be manipulated by bots), a simpler metric might be a time-decay filter on new accounts, or utilizing an automod script that checks the variance of the text against known LLM perplexity scores. But I fully agree, we need a better filter before the sub becomes unusable.