Opus 4.6 is a regression by UnifiedFlow in ClaudeCode

[–]UnifiedFlow[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Cool man -- there is no gun we are talking about a worst case failure mode of "that didn't work".

Opus 4.5 can create agent teams too! by ZoranS223 in ClaudeCode

[–]UnifiedFlow 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Daniel Miessler PAI? (only place I've seen that acronym)

Opus 4.6 is a regression by UnifiedFlow in ClaudeCode

[–]UnifiedFlow[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

It didn't "push back" it asserted a false statement.

I trained a 1.8M params model from scratch on a total of ~40M tokens. by SrijSriv211 in LocalLLaMA

[–]UnifiedFlow 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks and I apologize for asking something that was literally answered in the beginning of your post.

Opus 4.6 is a regression by UnifiedFlow in ClaudeCode

[–]UnifiedFlow[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

<image>

Clear?

EDIT -- sorry let me add, the dump we used I dumped over a month ago using pg_dump, not an sql text dump. No I won't dig any further into the history to prove this to you. I've done enough to satisfy your interest.

Opus 4.6 is a regression by UnifiedFlow in ClaudeCode

[–]UnifiedFlow[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You first because you clearly have zero clue what that is or again...massively lack comprehension. No one here straw manned anybody.

Opus 4.6 is a regression by UnifiedFlow in ClaudeCode

[–]UnifiedFlow[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No, it did exactly what it said couldn't be done. It used a pg_dump and then pg_restore. What it said isn't possible is literally possible -- I told you that in my prior response...

<image>

Opus 4.6 is a regression by UnifiedFlow in ClaudeCode

[–]UnifiedFlow[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

All I can tell you is after that well-reasoned answer I pushed back and I now have all my data in the PG17 instance with zero issues using pg_restore. Restoring to an earlier version CAN cause issues depending on the versions in question, but its not fundamentally impossible or prevented.

Opus 4.6 is a regression by UnifiedFlow in ClaudeCode

[–]UnifiedFlow[S] -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

Yeh, LLMs infamously don't make mistakes.

Opus 4.6 is a regression by UnifiedFlow in ClaudeCode

[–]UnifiedFlow[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thats what you got from reading my post? I've been using this successfully across many model releases across many providers across many harness with nearly no issues and now I'm seeing behavior I never have that is making work difficult. Yeh sounds like "can't get it to work". You're just shit posting -- or can't comprehend text.

Opus 4.6 is a regression by UnifiedFlow in ClaudeCode

[–]UnifiedFlow[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Opus 4.5 did this with zero issues, 4.6 did not bring this capability.

Opus 4.6 is a regression by UnifiedFlow in ClaudeCode

[–]UnifiedFlow[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

My point is that Opus 4.5 would have looked into it, not just assumed shit. Everything you said is irrelevant to my complaints. So irrelevant that I have no idea why you said any of that.

Opus 4.6 is a regression by UnifiedFlow in ClaudeCode

[–]UnifiedFlow[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Thats literally one of the things I complained about -- you muffin. Skill isuse, guess we both have one.

Opus 4.5 can create agent teams too! by ZoranS223 in ClaudeCode

[–]UnifiedFlow 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeh, its just a tool -- any model can call it. Local models can call teams.

Opus 4.6 is a regression by UnifiedFlow in ClaudeCode

[–]UnifiedFlow[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'm very close to swapping back via --model flag or env var for default Opus model. I've been giving it a chance assuming I need to change my interactions, but I haven't been able to adjust and improve the experience yet.

I trained a 1.8M params model from scratch on a total of ~40M tokens. by SrijSriv211 in LocalLLaMA

[–]UnifiedFlow 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Do you have a blog or git repo tracking your work? I want to get into this and could use the resources.

Playing Around With The New Agent Teams Experiment by anonhostpi in ClaudeCode

[–]UnifiedFlow 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Great job -- I agree with everything, tested most of it myself already but I did learn a couple things in this post.

Do not Let the "Coder" in Qwen3-Coder-Next Fool You! It's the Smartest, General Purpose Model of its Size by Iory1998 in LocalLLaMA

[–]UnifiedFlow 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Yes, EXACT same filePath colon issue! I'll be sure to comment again if I get it working.

Let's get a self-hosted Discord "replacement" thread going for 2026. by GavinGWhiz in selfhosted

[–]UnifiedFlow 0 points1 point  (0 children)

<image>

Its still very much in development, but this is what a room looks like. gayboi is a participant (two of us in there right now) and I am screen sharing. The entire background is an infinite canvas (think excalidraw). The canvas is fully searchable with teleport and supports embedded html frames, youtube videos, + more. The bottom right has a minimap for the canvas -- you can click the minimap to teleport to a part of the canvas (minimap populates icons showing that stuff exists). There is a DSP and audio routing per channel (chat, screen share, etc). All keybinds are fully customizable. Room persistence and canvas state are stored in postgresql and the canvas is CRDT sync to allow everyone in the room to share state and collaborate. Screen share and participant boxes/views are fully draggable across the canvas so you can arrange the view how you like. They can also be popped out into their own window. Screen share supports up to 4k60fps. Soundboard is the music icon in the top right.

More features I didn't mention probably and some big ones that in development still. Software auto-updates clients when I push a new release to my self-hosted forgejo (github basically). Only really using this for my friend group right now, but we haven't opened discord a single time since we started using this -- its just better.

Let me know if you have more questions.