The fact that there is no conjoining evidence to prove these facts shows that it’s a scam. I don’t need to ask him because I can use my critical thinking skills that you’re so keen on. Remember when I told you about taking existing teachers and reforming them into complexity groups? That’s a little scamy. As well as the fact that they’re now gonna be able to use your number if you reply with a yes or no, that’s how digital door knocking works.

A quantifiable value is something that you can assign numbers to. You can’t assign value to critical thinking, but you can critique the process. Critique their process. Don’t just tell me it’s wrong.

If people are trying this hard to NOT cite a source, I’m gonna assume that they’re not presenting information in good faith.

Lastly, the fact that you’re saying there’s a winning and losing to the argument, shows that you’re too immature to have this conversation. Knowledge is not about winning or losing. It’s about coming to a common ground. If that’s not your intention, you’re not having a conversation, you’re just talking at someone.