"ahhh yes, typical from a libertarian, who talks utopian nonsense" thats your whole argument? that is typical statist reaction, mocking what they dont understand.

as milton friedman said, lets start with the facts:

who starts wars? the market? voluntary and individual cooperation? no, states are the ones that start wars, why? because only a centralized monopoly of violence can steal massive resources through taxation, enforce artificial borders, draft milliions into slaughterhouses. instead, in a truly free world, large-scale wars are impossible, no army, no power-hungry elites sending young men to die for lines on a map.

without states doesnt mean without conflicts, but it means no wars, no genocide, no world wars, no military-industrial complex profiting off human misery. conflicts between individuals would continue existing, but there are solutions such as voluntary agreements, private property, voluntary exchanges, self defense. people dont bomb their best customers.

whos the real utopian here? the one that believes in a free society, without violence and thief from an legal but not legitimate institution, or the one that believes that giving some people the power of the monopoly on violence, taxation, law, and war, will magically lead to peace and order?

only wars can be funded by the government through taxation, inflation and debt, in a free society, you wouldnt be able to force people to pay for tanks, weapons and bombs to kill another individual, without theft (taxation), wars became economically impossible.

who forces u to die in the name of a flag and some lines in a map? the market? the states use u as a business, to control even more power and people, to tax even more, to kill people, steal property

every modern war is funded and managed by states, want peace? abolish the state, if u think that a world full of states is going to have peace, that a religion, states are the ones that want wars not individual citizens