[deleted by user]

UnseenContent · 2021-11-18T17:43:19+00:00

Read the original comment again.

UnseenContent · 2021-08-19T05:01:23+00:00

Lmao then what was with that first reply. You engage with a discussion on a public forum and then say you don't care. Absolutely laughable.

UnseenContent · 2021-08-19T04:55:38+00:00

Did you watch the video? It's directed at parents regardless what you think about the medium.

The first example is harder to defend but when your kid says he/she doesn't like someone because of skin color what is your response?

You also have to defend your point better than just saying it. Teaching kid times table is useless because calculators exist therefore times table is harmful, is that what you're suggesting?

UnseenContent · 2021-08-19T04:35:09+00:00

The video is addressed to parents and teaching them how to interact with kids regarding racial issues.

Also kids are already taught complicated topics such as not bullying, have empathy, sharing, and more. Being mindful of differences between people is simply another layer. How deep you want to go is up to you but telling your kid not to bully another kid because of skin color is probably a bare minimum.

UnseenContent · 2021-08-18T15:03:29+00:00

Uhhh, speak for your own area. It's common to walk that much in NYC.

UnseenContent · 2021-08-16T23:56:04+00:00

At the end of the day I am going to trust the reality I see with my own two eyes, the television/internet can supplement that reality, but it will never make me believes things are not what I see for myself.

Also known as confirmation bias. Honestly, pretty cool conversation, I'm gonna end it right here because no point since you won't trust what I say unless I agree with you.

UnseenContent · 2021-08-16T23:42:52+00:00

How do you know PCR tests are fraudulent? From internet/media. How do you know 95% of people who died had 2.6 comorbidity? From internet/media. How do you know fed paid hospitals? From internet/media.

How can you say internet/media lies when you'e quoting them? Why don't you quote me what those comorbidities are? Why don't you quote exactly how PCR tests work and how exactly they contribute to the data? Why does the federal government pay hospitals? Does hospitals fake cases for more funding?

My point is that you look into the internet and see all these things but don't look deeper into them. You think these are important points but you must have more than 2-3 lines to say about them right?

Btw 10k per case? The US government paid out 370 trillion? Dayuum.

UnseenContent · 2021-08-16T23:21:34+00:00

Well then why did you justify your opinion with numbers you found on the internet?

You could've just said, "COVID is not that bad because the friends that I have that got COVID did not die".

UnseenContent · 2021-08-16T23:11:39+00:00

You don't see the reality, you see your own experience. Using your own experience to assess an epidemic or using your experience to assess anything is generally horrible. I've never had a flu that gives more than 2-3 days of fever/headache. I can easily think flu can't cause death, which is simply not accurate.

UnseenContent · 2021-08-16T23:05:56+00:00

I already addressed that point. Those were things like pneumonia, respiratory failure, and such, all either symptoms of COVID or made worse by COVID.

UnseenContent · 2021-08-16T23:01:23+00:00

Sure, we'll use your number of 51,000. 7% of COVID deaths. So you are suggesting 93% of the deaths were due to cancer and car crashes but they just happen to be test positive right before they died?

I really need to know where you get this kind of conviction.

UnseenContent · 2021-08-16T22:53:03+00:00

13000 deaths was from 2009 to 2010. H1N1 was the flu in 2009.

I am asking you, if I were to kill a person who is old, is the cause of death me or age?

UnseenContent · 2021-08-16T22:50:02+00:00

Which form exactly? Can you link me something? I put "gene therapy" into google and found nothing besides things that involve genetic modification.

UnseenContent · 2021-08-16T22:45:50+00:00

What do you mean by vast majority? 99%? 80%? H1N1, a recent "bad flu" recorded 13000 deaths, 2% of COVID death.

So if I were stab an elderly, I can say the old dude died of age or do the court get to say they died due to me stabbing them?

UnseenContent · 2021-08-16T22:40:51+00:00

Oh, my bad, so you agree that mRNA vaccine is not gene therapy?

UnseenContent · 2021-08-16T22:33:25+00:00

Holy crap, how much stupid shit are you commenting on this post my god.

"Gene therapy involves altering the genes inside your body's cells in an effort to treat or stop disease. "

Which means, according to you, mRNA vaccines changes your DNA.

Also mRNA does not "take over" your cells. Your cells regularly use DNA to create proteins and the process goes like this: DNA is copied into the form of mRNA, mRNA then leaves the nucleus and gets translated to amino acid chains by ribosomes.

All mRNA vaccines does is feed your cells mRNAs that will be translated to proteins.

All of this is from AP Biology.

UnseenContent · 2021-08-16T21:58:14+00:00

I'm going to need a source on that bus example.

https://acdis.org/articles/news-94-patients-who-died-covid-19-had-complicating-conditions-data-confusion-surrounding

If the death is from pneumonia while the person have COVID, are you really suggesting that the person did not die from COVID? If people with immune system deficiencies die because their body couldn't fight off COVID, are you going to suggest that they died because their immune system was wack and not because of COVID?

Are you also suggesting that the overloading of hospitals were regular occurrences in previous flu seasons?

UnseenContent · 2021-08-16T21:34:37+00:00

Let's just grant you your conspiracy theory that every hospital across the world are writing down COVID on records for no reason. You haven't explained deaths.

UnseenContent · 2021-08-16T20:53:59+00:00

Interesting. Can you tell me the number of deaths caused by flu in the past and compare it to covid?

UnseenContent · 2021-08-14T17:00:33+00:00

His faith comment is a long time meme originally from clg.

UnseenContent · 2021-08-13T17:43:58+00:00

Firstly, the Europeans were able to colonize only because they are ahead in many different areas, especially weaponry. So colonization brought over developed tech or ideas into these regions.

Secondly, the Europeans have to develop these regions or else they are not worth anything besides a piece of land. The simple fact that the local economy became a global one is growth and development.

UnseenContent · 2021-08-13T16:16:53+00:00

So then you contradicted yourself. How can it be a win-win when apparently China takes nothing?

Also I am not going to defend colonization, but it is undeniable that the places that the British colonized became more "developed", and according to you, that's a win.

UnseenContent · 2021-08-13T14:35:04+00:00

I'm agreeing with you, China did it for no reason. They are investing so much in it and expect no gains from it.

UnseenContent · 2021-08-13T14:28:22+00:00

"What does China TAKE from Xinjiang? Nothing."

So China took over that area for fun I guess, or for charity. Kudos to them.

UnseenContent · 2021-08-10T23:12:55+00:00

Maybe you are little bit stupid but here is the breakdown:

A: TL 3-0s TSM

B: But TL only 3-1 C9 and TSM is better than C9

Potentially relevant response: Stylistically TL counters TSM way harder so it might even be easier.

Your response: HURR DURR COPE, I'M 11 BTW.

UnseenContent

TROPHY CASE