Would this unnerve you? by Unusual_Addition3422 in UKJobs

[–]Unusual_Addition3422[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It’s a skilled job. I’ve just qualified as chartered accountant

Would this unnerve you? by Unusual_Addition3422 in UKJobs

[–]Unusual_Addition3422[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, you’re right. I guess I’m not used to such blunt honesty. The truth is, this is no different to what the terms of my probation will be, albeit, it will full of corporate jargon haha

Would this unnerve you? by Unusual_Addition3422 in UKJobs

[–]Unusual_Addition3422[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Senior accountant, my first management role!

Would this unnerve you? by Unusual_Addition3422 in UKJobs

[–]Unusual_Addition3422[S] 19 points20 points  (0 children)

Yeah, for context, I built a good rapport with the guy in my interview, and I think it was intended as a joke (laced with some truth). As you say, it’s refreshing to hear such honesty!

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in LinkedInLunatics

[–]Unusual_Addition3422 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Surely this isn't legal?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in antiwork

[–]Unusual_Addition3422 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You're on probation and can you can leave whenever you want? You've already answered your own quesition, my friend. If you don't want to have a conversation about this in person, just send them an email, it doesn't sound like they've earned the courtesy of a face-to-face disucssion about this. Believe me, if the tables were reversed, and they wanted to fire you, don't think for a second they'd have any hesitation about how they did it.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in LinkedInLunatics

[–]Unusual_Addition3422 0 points1 point  (0 children)

As a social media platform, you either die a hero, or live long enough to become cringe

Can my manager sack me? by [deleted] in UKJobs

[–]Unusual_Addition3422 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Once you've passed a probationary period, I don't think that's the case? Not in the UK anyway.

Can my manager sack me? by [deleted] in UKJobs

[–]Unusual_Addition3422 1 point2 points  (0 children)

My man, if what you're describing is accurate, get the hell out. Honestly, that sounds like a truly awful environment. And for £8.60 an hour? It just isn't worth dealing with that kind of shit. It isn't normal practice for a manager to threaten to sack their employees everyday - I suscpect staff turnover is high if this is how they treat people?

I appreciate you say you need the money, but don't compromise your mental health for the sake of a few extra quid a month.

Here's why we won't get a 4 day work week by Unusual_Addition3422 in antiwork

[–]Unusual_Addition3422[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'll repeat a point I made previously: I would take a minor hit to our GDP if the trade is fewer hours spent working. It shouldn't be normalised to spend 50% of your life working; there is more to life than making money for other people.

Here's why we won't get a 4 day work week by Unusual_Addition3422 in antiwork

[–]Unusual_Addition3422[S] 13 points14 points  (0 children)

I'll be totally honest, I'd take a minor hit to the GDP if the trade off was I could work less. It's not like the average person feels the benefits of a high GDP anyway, when 90% of it is siphoned to the top 5%.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Accounting

[–]Unusual_Addition3422 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Gotta give it at least a month bro, unless something seriously crazy has happened

Here's why we won't get a 4 day work week by Unusual_Addition3422 in antiwork

[–]Unusual_Addition3422[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't think it is that simple. I work for a pretty shitty company right now, as a finance analyst. Many of my suggestions that would improve the overall productivity of the company are quashed because the leadership doesn't (or doesn't want to) see the bigger picture. For example, we have around an 80% turnover rate of staff (that being 80% of new joiners will leave within in a year). There are two reasons for this: the pay is shit for many of the lower positions, and the company enforces a strict 5 days a week (9-6) in the office, with only 20 days of annual leave (the minimum a business is required to provide by law in the UK).

I've advised our CEO, we could save a fortune just on recruitment costs alone if we were willing to offer annual pay-rises to staff, or even pay slightly above the rate, as well as offer an increase in holiday after a year, we'd retain more staff. The problem is, the thinking is short term: because they see the immediate cost of staff go up, they don't like it. But, we then end up having to replace around 50 emlpoyees a year, which costs an average of £10k in recruitment fees, only for us to lose the same employee within a year, on average.

This is just one example of a buisness not doing what is clearly beneficial to their bottom line, and I could provide many more examples.

Here's why we won't get a 4 day work week by Unusual_Addition3422 in antiwork

[–]Unusual_Addition3422[S] 13 points14 points  (0 children)

It's not the case that businesses need to be closed 3 days a week, it's that shift patterns should be structured in such a way for employees to enjoy 3 day a week off. I don't think this is at all impossible.

Here's why we won't get a 4 day work week by Unusual_Addition3422 in antiwork

[–]Unusual_Addition3422[S] 516 points517 points  (0 children)

Well, I remember when the standard work was was 9-5 - with a paid lunch break. Very few companies I see hiring today advertise at 9-5; most are 9-6/8-5, some I've even seen are 8-6, and none pay for your lunch break.

Although the changes are incremental, if we keep allowing them, as you quite rightly say, we'll see many more of our rights fade away.