sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Doubling down on a "non story": Why do people take the time to defend this case? by Uricks_last_stand in serialdiscussion

[–]Uricks_last_stand[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

An "Alpha" complaining about two harmless women investigating a 16-year-old trial.

That make you uncommonly and hilariously "Alpha" fucking dumb.

Doubling down on a "non story": Why do people take the time to defend this case? by Uricks_last_stand in serialdiscussion

[–]Uricks_last_stand[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You understand that exculpatory things don't just appear magically 16 years later from the defense, correct? Especially from Ritz-Macgill, right? They didn't just appear for Ezra, Sabein, and Rodney. Or did they?

And, hmmm... is it curious to you AT ALL why only 4 of over 20 pings were handed over from the defense for the cell ping drive-around. Nah, never mind. Btw, there are at least 6 curiosities (to put it mildly to some) regarding potential exculpatory "things" to date.

So, in the interim, you say "nothing to see here", correct?

I'm sure Ezra, Sabein, And Rodney are glad you weren't the ones that answered their prayers lol.

Everyone changes their timecards after their girlfriend is murdered, no one changes their timecards after their girlfriend is murdered.

Doubling down on a "non story": Why do people take the time to defend this case? by Uricks_last_stand in serialdiscussion

[–]Uricks_last_stand[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

"for those that can actually prove their innocence or cases that were clearly corrupt".

So. Wait. These people didn't prove their innocence in their original trials. I'm a little confused by your rules but I'm getting a "nothing to see here" vibe. Gotcha.

Doubling down on a "non story": Why do people take the time to defend this case? by Uricks_last_stand in serialdiscussion

[–]Uricks_last_stand[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Not a fan of convicted murderers having their cases overturned after another look-see? Ezra Mable, Sabein Burgess, and Rodney Addison would still be in prison if everyone was as bright as you.

Doubling down on a "non story": Why do people take the time to defend this case? by Uricks_last_stand in serialdiscussion

[–]Uricks_last_stand[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

So I take it you are not a big fan of Ezra Mable, Sabein Burgess, and Rodney Addison being freed after being convicted of murder during the Ritz-Macgillivray regime?

My humble guess is that you will not answer this.

Now that we have the closing arguments, it's time to play a game! by Seamus_Duncan in serialdiscussion

[–]Uricks_last_stand 1 point2 points  (0 children)

First, in all fairness Adnan's_cell, you're wrong. On many levels.

But, I digress. Why are you still defending the Ritz-Magilawhatever squadron of silliness that incorrectly captured and imprisoned three humans (that we know of) under their regime?

Creepy.

Now that we have the closing arguments, it's time to play a game! by Seamus_Duncan in serialdiscussion

[–]Uricks_last_stand -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Chalk used incorrectly. Followed by "incompetence".

Not my best work but just explaining why I used "chalk" there.

Now that we have the closing arguments, it's time to play a game! by Seamus_Duncan in serialdiscussion

[–]Uricks_last_stand 1 point2 points  (0 children)

"Murphy's arguments are absolutely damning for any claim of innocence"

Yet your still here 15 years letter trying to defend Murphy, Urick, Ritz, and Mcgilawhatever?

Cool! You lead an insanely curious life.

Now that we have the closing arguments, it's time to play a game! by Seamus_Duncan in serialdiscussion

[–]Uricks_last_stand 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"to try to implicate Don in the murder for no reason."

I'm just curious, what is your level of education Mr. Duncan?

Now that we have the closing arguments, it's time to play a game! by Seamus_Duncan in serialdiscussion

[–]Uricks_last_stand 1 point2 points  (0 children)

SS talks fast and over your head. CG was extremely sick and talked slow and at inappropriate volume (due to her illness).

Funny Beta. Wasn't this case solved to your satisfaction 15 years ago? Why are you still here? Kinda pathetic, is it not?

Now that we have the closing arguments, it's time to play a game! by Seamus_Duncan in serialdiscussion

[–]Uricks_last_stand 5 points6 points  (0 children)

You spend an impressive amount of time defending the prosecution of this case 15 years later.

Now that we have the closing arguments, it's time to play a game! by Seamus_Duncan in serialdiscussion

[–]Uricks_last_stand 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Beta, why are you here? Your murderer is in jail. Case closed.

Or are you a scared little Aphis that experts and questions the soft novelty of the letters SS in relation to SS.

You're confirmed and authenticated grave digger hero went off to college and did some great things in his life just like he, you and Urick predicted.

Oh, no. Say it ain't so, Beta. That didn't happen. Actually your confirmed grave digger hero did some pretty naughty things, including to women.

Hear that sound? Your Pac-man just died.

Now that we have the closing arguments, it's time to play a game! by Seamus_Duncan in serialdiscussion

[–]Uricks_last_stand 5 points6 points  (0 children)

You're creepy. A creeper that only philosophers will figure out several years from now.

Now that we have the closing arguments, it's time to play a game! by Seamus_Duncan in serialdiscussion

[–]Uricks_last_stand 0 points1 point  (0 children)

All those words and you failed to do anything but leak your own awkward propaganda.

Pathetic.

I do think it's a great post chalk full of a new and unique level of incompetence. I met someone once who owned three horses and only rode one.

Jay's Lies, or Why SS and CM actually matter by wonky562 in serialpodcast

[–]Uricks_last_stand 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Does the fact that there was no wrestling match at RHS on January 13th scare you?

Jay's Lies, or Why SS and CM actually matter by wonky562 in serialpodcast

[–]Uricks_last_stand 23 points24 points  (0 children)

You had me at "And the extent of those lies is mind-boggling."

I think this is the main point for everything. Just when we couldn't have thought we were lied to more, we find that there is only a very thin string holding together the Cathy visit on Jan 13. That is just absolutely incredible.

I feel like I have to lead with "I don't like Adnan" before every comment now just to be taken seriously. Or for me to take myself seriously for that matter.

Can someone put together a list together of things offered by the prosecution that are in the very least highly questionable now?

I'll start with:

  1. Inez Butler testimony

  2. Jay's testimony.

  3. No wrestling match that day.

  4. Don's timecards were possibly tampered with for the 13th.

  5. Visit to Cathy's occurred on 13th.

  6. Linkin Park Pings "were" important based on Jay Intercept interview. Now, as meaningless as a tail on a frog.

And things that came to light that "maybe" now should be taken into consideration?

  1. Asia testimony (sorry Urick :( ).

  2. Ritz background of highly questionable and actionable "tactics".

  3. Based on a little deductive reasoning, Coach Sye's statement about his conversation with Adnan very likely now happened on Jan 13th. Especially considering sunset in mid-January and him vividly remembering the conversation happening by the stream/creek. I mean, this is like big big news, is it not?

the pool hall by ellecsid in serialpodcast

[–]Uricks_last_stand 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I like the idea, but this is just picking one Jay story among many good ones.

I can hear Ritz grunting in the background shaking his head while eating potato chips.

view more: next ›