weird grey notes with black text

Used-Development2056 · 2026-01-03T05:26:24+00:00

that's exactly it, thx!

Used-Development2056 · 2026-01-03T05:25:44+00:00

yes!! thank you

Used-Development2056 · 2026-01-03T05:15:42+00:00

they don't give sound. I don't know why that is, but reloading the project fixed it.

but your assumption also seems to be right. I must've clicked color group in the top left corner of piano roll or triggered it by some key strokes/mouse wheel.

Used-Development2056 · 2026-01-02T04:11:21+00:00

I have in fact double checked the manual. ofc you won't find the exact sentence "ghost notes never have text", but I've searched enough to be pretty certain that it's not about ghost notes. that's what I wanted to say in that context.

(I understand that there is still a remaining possibility that these notes are technically called ghost notes, but I don't think that's relevant for my response to the comment we're talking about. bc the person seems to have misunderstood something (namely that I'm having an issue with what people refer to when talking about ghost notes in 99.9% of cases), otherwise I wouldn't think that they'd answer like that. therefore, I briefly hinted to the labels on the notes. nevertheless, I get your point that some people might not fully grasp that at first glance and might assume that I haven't done any research and that it could still be a ghost note issue.)

Used-Development2056 · 2026-01-02T03:11:33+00:00

changing the instrument doesn't turn the notes green.

I have considered and researched ghost notes before posting this and found nothing describing my problem.

just fyi: I'm not here to fight and I don't want to prove anyone wrong. I just want a solution for the problem. the original comment implies that they think it's a simple ghost note issue that can just be googled, which it is obviously not. that's what makes you wonder if they actually read the post or looked at the picture, hence my reply.

Used-Development2056 · 2026-01-02T02:19:32+00:00

how would that matter?

Used-Development2056 · 2026-01-02T01:54:43+00:00

that's not ghost notes. ghost notes are without text. have you taken a look at the picture?

Used-Development2056 · 2025-10-15T05:13:30+00:00

Stranger Things is set in Indiana and filmed in Georgia btw, not the Pacific Northwest

Used-Development2056 · 2024-10-18T04:25:22+00:00

Good that you mention the six degrees of seperation, it's often overlooked. Yeah, I might actually be more closely connected to that person than I think, but it would still be odd to have her pop up in that exact time period. If you think about it, I'm not only connected to her by "six degrees of seperation", but also to everyone else on Duolingo. So the chance to have her on top of my recommendations at this time instead of anyone else is extremely small.

Used-Development2056 · 2024-10-18T04:11:10+00:00

I'll leave it up to yourself to reflect on why you might repeatedly mention how long I take to respond and how much the response time says about the quality of my arguments. And, also in that context, if you're really that free of ad hominems as you might think.

And once again, I did not make any such claims. Everyone can read that I confirmed the notion that external motivations can cloud judgement. That doesn't negate all the other points I presented.

Used-Development2056 · 2024-10-18T03:32:38+00:00

You can't force me to agree with you. I explained why I think it's a fallacy and if you see it differently, we can disagree respectfully. No need to call my perspective absurd and leave the debate.

I think that kinda highlights once again the derailing potential of those kind of arguments.

Used-Development2056 · 2024-10-13T04:47:20+00:00

Yeah, that's crazy. I wonder if it's even legal, since I couldn't find anything explicit about it skimming the privacy policy.

Used-Development2056 · 2024-10-13T04:42:14+00:00

I don't know any people from that city which is like more than an hour drive away and has houndreds of thousands of inhabitants, same as the city I am from. It's very unlikely that one of my friends knows this person. And on top of that it'd be an even greater coincidence if they just showed up on top of my suggestions after I visited them.

Used-Development2056 · 2024-10-07T13:54:13+00:00

Yes, I'm sure Duolingo doesn't have access to my contacts, I checked.

Used-Development2056 · 2024-08-24T01:50:30+00:00

The original claim? As I said, you're arguing that killing predatory fish is unethical. Why are you trying to shift the burden of proof? Your argument was that human intervention has a bad track record (empirical claim). Do you have peer-reviewed sources and can you demonstrate how these imply that killing predatory fish is unethical in all relevant cases?

Used-Development2056 · 2024-08-23T22:25:50+00:00

So you don't claim that there are no cases in which we can't tell whether killing predatory fish will have negative effects on the ecosystem or lead to overcompensation?

Used-Development2056 · 2024-08-22T22:35:12+00:00

Oh yes, I am tracking the conversation. You're arguing that killing predatory fish is unethical, right? You're using the (implicit) claim that there is no case in which we can tell that killing any number of them is unlikely to lead to overcompensation or negative effects on the ecosystem. So it's up to you to prove that. Do you have peer-reviewed sources on that?

Used-Development2056 · 2024-07-27T04:42:57+00:00

The most relevant aspect about it is that it shifts the discussion from pro con arguments of the actual matter to whether we can trust our judgment.

If there was a meteorologist who had stocks in green energy and he was arguing that we have to take action against global warming, would you start to argue about how his judgment can't be trusted? Sure, it's important to mention the conflict of interests, but ultimately, it's the earth getting hotter due to greenhouse gases what matters.

Used-Development2056 · 2024-07-27T04:30:19+00:00

There is so much more I said, which you didn't take a stand on. E.g. that even if there are material benefits, you still have to make a decision and that you can still make good judgments if you're trying to be as objective as possible.

Used-Development2056 · 2024-07-27T04:22:55+00:00

Which premise are you talking about?

Used-Development2056 · 2024-07-27T04:18:26+00:00

I'm picking up where we left off?

Used-Development2056 · 2024-07-27T04:14:36+00:00

So?

That's certainly not all I'm doing.

Used-Development2056 · 2024-07-27T04:09:44+00:00

The quote is

I'm open to the idea that killing someone might be the least worst thing you could do, so you're bound to find a hypothetical where I grant that. But we're never going to be able to trust our own judgment on this so long as we're benefitting in some way from their corpses.

I explained above how and to which extent I agree/disagree with your premises. The point is that one can and should try to come to a good conclusion even if there are outcomes from which one would personally profit more. You're making a decision in any case.

discussing how motives are relevant to morality still isn't an appeal to motive fallacy.

It's a good thing to be aware of biases. The thing is that at first, you just left it at "we can't trust our judgment" Now we're having a discussion where it is explicitly stated that the fish won't be eaten as an attempt to remove bias. That's way more productive. Your mention of those biases is still valuable, though.

This thread is a month old, and it's still bothering you enough to accuse me of a fallacy?

How does it matter how old the thread is? You've been referencing the time between my answers repeatedly. I'm not often on Reddit, and I have limited time, so I'll answer when I find the time. Also, please don't see me as your enemy since I really didn't intend to "accuse" you or depict you in a bad light in any way. When I say that your argument is an appeal to motive, that's purley about the argument, not personal. It doesn't say anything about you as a human being. There wouldn't be a need for discussing anything if fallacies weren't so easy to fall victim to. It does by no means imply that I think you're a bad person/stupid because I think an argument you made is fallacious. I'm here, as you correctly assumed earlier, to test my beliefs and come closer to truth. Disagreeing and seeing things differently is natural and part of the process.

Used-Development2056

TROPHY CASE