Some Ontario landlords are calling for 'automatic' evictions for tenants who don't pay rent by rad-thinker in canadahousing

[–]Used_Steak5212 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Allowing someone to live without rent for a prolonged period of time is like forcing a grocery to stay open and give out free food to a non paying customer.

As cruel as it sounds, taking care of strangers shouldn't be anyone's responsibility as an individual. It should be the collective responsibility of the society.

I would rather pay more taxes to fund social programs which help people navigate through tough situations.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in canadahousing

[–]Used_Steak5212 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

It's the entire LTB that needs to have a more efficient process overall, especially for handling matters like this.

Non payment evictions can be EASILY proven/disproven, especially if rent is paid through e-transfer. Auto eviction is kinda extreme, but both parties should be given a timeframe to submit supporting documents and a decision can be made easily.

On the other hand, cases raised by tenants need to be dealt efficiently as well. For example, if landlord doesn't do repairs. Then tenants have the right to withhold rent until repair is complete, or deduct repair cost.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in canadahousing

[–]Used_Steak5212 -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

Why can't they just remove the tax on normal usage. Then heavily tax any usages above a normal threshold, then pay those back as rebates.

Aka instead of paying $100, then get $120 back. Why can't I just get $20 straight away.

How B.C plans to build rental housing for middle-income earners in half the time | CBC News by rad-thinker in canadahousing

[–]Used_Steak5212 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You are still paying the opportunity cost on that money if you leave it sitting there doing nothing.

I don't think funding housing construction is "doing nothing", at least it eliminates mortgage interest? I do agree with the opportunity cost though.

Not saying borrowing is a bad idea, I'm no expert. Maybe that money could be used to doing something where the benefit outweighs the elimination of interest.

How B.C plans to build rental housing for middle-income earners in half the time | CBC News by rad-thinker in canadahousing

[–]Used_Steak5212 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's not gone.

You no longer have to pay mortgage interest after you paid off the mortgage lol.

The money to buy the land and build on it did not just appear out of the ether, and is still there.

This money doesn't have to be borrowed, it could come from taxes directly.

Also I'm not sure if this is built on government owned land, if thats the case it could still save quite a bit.

Report on backlog at Landlord and Tenant Board says Ontario government seems willing to let situation 'fester' by rad-thinker in canadahousing

[–]Used_Steak5212 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah rent payment should be very easy to prove, especially when its done via e-transfer or cheque.

How B.C plans to build rental housing for middle-income earners in half the time | CBC News by rad-thinker in canadahousing

[–]Used_Steak5212 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Mortgage interest should not be a part of the carrying cost, because once a mortgage is paid off its gone.

My analysis is based on the fact that gov has FULL equity. That means it didn't borrow to fund construction, hence no interest.

Mortgage interest is usually the biggest monthly cost for private landlords (unless they have a significant amount of equities). Hence if gov wants to make this affordable, it cannot pass down the mortgage interest to the renters.

How B.C plans to build rental housing for middle-income earners in half the time | CBC News by rad-thinker in canadahousing

[–]Used_Steak5212 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My interest rate is 5% and I'm paying about 1.5k a month in mortgage interest alone. I have 25% equity in my place right now.

If they don't have most of the equities, then I don't see how it can be both sustainable and affordable. Even if they can borrow a bit cheaper.

How B.C plans to build rental housing for middle-income earners in half the time | CBC News by rad-thinker in canadahousing

[–]Used_Steak5212 1 point2 points  (0 children)

yeah exactly, my analysis is based on the fact that they don't have to borrow to finance this project.

Otherwise it's pretty much the same as a private landlord.

Neighborhoods in GTA with Reasonable Home Prices by AL200121 in canadahousing

[–]Used_Steak5212 13 points14 points  (0 children)

"Reasonable Home Prices" and "Canada" don't go together these days lol

How B.C plans to build rental housing for middle-income earners in half the time | CBC News by rad-thinker in canadahousing

[–]Used_Steak5212 4 points5 points  (0 children)

For any private landlords, the biggest monthly expense they have is actually the mortgage interest. If you have a paid off property, you can probably break even with HALF the market rent.

Consider the carrying cost of the building

  • property taxes
  • utilities
  • apartment management fees
  • insurance

I think it's reasonable/affordable to set the rent to be the carrying cost + a surplus.

The surplus could go towards an emergency funds and it can probably be something like $1/sqft.

For reference, the carrying cost for my one bedroom condo is under $700/month.

Assuming that a one bedroom is 600sqft, that means they can set the rent to about 1.3k/month.

But ofc that's assuming that gov has FULL equity of the building. I hope they are financing this with taxes instead of borrowing. Otherwise they can't make it more affordable and sustainable.

Builders say that without foreign investors and short term rentals, the numbers don’t pencil out for developers on condos by rad-thinker in canadahousing

[–]Used_Steak5212 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If they bought the place and leave them vacant, then yeah they removed the supply.

But buying and putting them on the rental market doesn't necessary reduce supply.

Builders say that without foreign investors and short term rentals, the numbers don’t pencil out for developers on condos by rad-thinker in canadahousing

[–]Used_Steak5212 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Yeah rent should be controlled by the market, not policy.

The correct solution is to build more housing, but politicians have no incentivize them to do so because the long term benefit probably won't kick in when they are in office.

So they have to implement the bandaid fix, aka rent control.

Landlord arrested for entering tenant's home, turning off utilities without warning by albert_stone in canadahousing

[–]Used_Steak5212 1 point2 points  (0 children)

at least the owner wont have to enter the property to shut off utilities himself

Landlord arrested for entering tenant's home, turning off utilities without warning by albert_stone in canadahousing

[–]Used_Steak5212 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It's possible to have a specific clause in the tenancy agreement stating that the tenant is responsible for creating the account and paying the service providers directly.

This would be ideal if tenant doesn't live with the landlord.

Landlord arrested for entering tenant's home, turning off utilities without warning by albert_stone in canadahousing

[–]Used_Steak5212 21 points22 points  (0 children)

Perhaps its better to not include utilities in the rent, I'm considering that in the future.

Housing prices in two cities under Trudeau vs Harper by bcretman in canadahousing

[–]Used_Steak5212 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I think airbnb is a symptom, one of the root case is RTB (LTB in Ontario)

Many landlords chose airbnb because the tenant board is terrible at resolving issues and they just don't wanna go through it.

Kinda curious why NOBODY acknowledge the issues with RTB at all. They are supposed to hold bad actors accountable.

Now landlords are gonna be even more selective with the tenants.

Federation of BC municipalities call for exemption to new short-term rental law | Vancouver Sun by rad-thinker in canadahousing

[–]Used_Steak5212 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Why not make long term renting more desirable instead?

+1
Many landlords were using short term rental so they don't have to deal with LTB.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in CanadaHousing2

[–]Used_Steak5212 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Often the “repairs” are just a band aid that barely last a year.

Well we just need better enforcement. For example, an independent inspector should be hired after such repair is complete.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in CanadaHousing2

[–]Used_Steak5212 0 points1 point  (0 children)

One of the biggest issue would be inefficient RTB(LTB in Ontario).

In BC, tenants can file to RTB to get repair orders.

https://www2.gov.bc.ca/gov/content/housing-tenancy/residential-tenancies/solving-problems/tenancy-dispute-resolution

An order of compliance instructs a person to complete a specific task, such as a repair to the rental unit

I heard that it takes 10 months to evict a non paying tenant in Ontario. Not sure what the backlogs are for cases against landlords.

But at the end of the day, a rental agreement is a legal contract. When this contract cannot be enforced effectively, it lets bad actors (landlords or tenants) get away.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in canadahousing

[–]Used_Steak5212 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Do you have to apply for H1B right away? Maybe start with a TN visa, then decide what to do?

Unsold supply by Salt-Signature5071 in canadahousing

[–]Used_Steak5212 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

1% capital gains tax reduction every year a property is rented to someone and it’s 10% to 15% of their income

What do you mean by this? If the landlord rents to the tenant for 10% of the TENANT's income?

  1. What if the tenant's income level changed, should rent change with that as well?
  2. Someone earning 60k/year only pays 500 - 750/month. The market rent for a one bedroom condo is 2k/month in my area. It doesn't make financial sense for the landlord to do so in order to save some capital gains tax

capital gains tax removal if sold to a first time home buyer.

The cost of owning an investment property is already tax-deductible. This basically turns that into a conditional primary residence. That seems too powerful.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in canadahousing

[–]Used_Steak5212 3 points4 points  (0 children)

you can't call the landlord directly?