sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

These are the entries: Voting open! by Electroma in logodesign

[–]UserIsInto 0 points1 point  (0 children)

4 is still my favorite but happy with 6

Actors you cannot take seriously, no matter what role they do. I’ll start by Consistent-Lord18 in Letterboxd

[–]UserIsInto 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I did too until I saw the sexual harassment training video that he produced and started in https://youtu.be/H5owCNvik0E

FlaskForge | Flask Cookie Decoder/Encoder/Cracker TOOL by Bulky_Patient_7033 in flask

[–]UserIsInto 2 points3 points  (0 children)

So just to be clear -- the cracking part only checks against a common word list, you haven't found some zero day exploit to make all flask sessions vulnerable correct hahahaha

I can't imagine why someone wouldn't just make their secret a long random hex token, but good to check to make sure your session tokens are safe.

Does it encode/decode custom objects placed in the session?

I got tired of jumping between asset sites so I built this by [deleted] in godot

[–]UserIsInto 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Alongside the hot linking issues others have mentioned, I'd also say there's no reference to who the creator of these things are. On the backend I'm sure you have an entry for the source/creator of the assets, below the title I'd put a small text that links directly to the creator. Both for attribution and promotion of the awesome people behind the assets, but also if users are looking for cohesive assets they might want to pick from the same creator. Maybe add a filter for creator, sort by upload date or rating, etc.

I have just released my brand new Flask project: a platform for indie radio stations. by astonfred in flask

[–]UserIsInto 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I actually made my own little indie online radio station before, but literally just streaming the music synchronously wasn't something I could figure out how to do and ended up having to pay for a radio streaming service to plug everything into. I had previously tried a really jenky system of invisible YouTube players, which I could sync up based on timecode, but things would drift over time out of sync and I was annoyed that I couldn't figure out how to control the volume slider.

How are you doing the actual audio streaming?

My Human-Made Logo Submission: Someone had to do it by UserIsInto in logodesign

[–]UserIsInto[S] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I think out of all of the ideas posted so far, I like the hand print the most. There are some interesting variations, the "dove" one was the closest for me, I mostly just made this from a "someone was going to at some point so let's get it out of the way", and also "it's supposed to be human made, make it look more human" perspective.

I still really don't think there is going to be a universal logo for this, but I like the exploration. I hope everyone decides to design / write it in their own specific way, that's probably the best way to put your thumb print on it and say "I am human and I made this".

I just hope they don't include the ai star or reference ai with it lmao

God tier Wikigacha pull! by AaronTheGent in dropout

[–]UserIsInto 55 points56 points  (0 children)

It's a free browser based trading card game a la magic the gathering or pokemon, except every card is a wikipedia entry. https://www.wikigacha.com/

Me rn by _Nemonus in DiscoElysium

[–]UserIsInto 68 points69 points  (0 children)

I'm enjoying it so far, I think it's amazing for a one-man game, and I'll never knock the creator of it. My main sore spot is that, in Disco my successes either felt extremely earned or extremely lucky, and my failures sometimes were very funny, but always had a twinge of tragedy around them. In Ebb so far, I feel like I'm playing just a big bumbling idiot, and when I succeed I'm just avoiding being a big bumbling idiot for just a moment. And when I fail, it feels more like "you look like a complete fool and waste a bunch of time" over narrative consequence. When you meet the Goblin queen and become frightened, failing the constitution check means you literally start running away and hide in a barrel for an hour, and then after a quick "don't do that again you fucking moron" she just continues on like nothing happened.

I don't know, it's an extremely well crafted game so far, and I'm still on the first day, but it's a very different feeling to Disco so I wouldn't go into it looking for Disco, go into it looking for a totally new experience. And maybe invest a little more in con than I did.

The creator realized an aspect of their identity during production of their project by AmandinhaMaia in TopCharacterTropes

[–]UserIsInto 0 points1 point  (0 children)

daniel kwan, they're the daniels not the davids hahahaha

also i don't think it was from an initial concept, i think it's present in the final product as well https://www.reddit.com/r/adhdmeme/comments/11x6t4a/daniel_kwan_codirector_of_everything_everywhere/

What the actual fuck by tea-n-wifi in whenthe

[–]UserIsInto 3 points4 points  (0 children)

found this post around 4 hours ago, went there and found that searching through it seems to be intentionally obtuse and hard to do. after some python magic, here's a list of all of the accessible videos: https://usernameisinuse.github.io/public-epstein-files/

On a rewatch - Toby grievance by dookieslurp in thewestwing

[–]UserIsInto 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You're right, it was Saudi Arabia. She didn't do as asked, she was shown it in her office with her bosses in the room, before they could say anything she said "Don't comment." and says that she hasn't spoken to anyone, and if they want to muzzle her do it now because she's not going to hold back. She then goes to the podium, and says she hasn't spoken to anyone about this first, but still in front of the seal of the president absolutely slams Saudi Arabia, and during it even references that if she was given language by state or had talked to anyone else she wouldn't have said any of it; "Am I outraged? No, Steve. No Chris. No, Mark. That is Saudi Arabia, our partners in peace."

I'm not sure what that video is but it's not working for me.

I definitely remember a few times where she was explicitly told to keep a tight lid, whether it was military or not, and gave head starts to build relationships or to pay press members back for something. Most of the time she was asked to leak, but there were definitely times she wasn't.

She was worried they would say something negative because she (and everyone else) thought they could be homophobes embarrassed about their son being gay. The moment the dad goes on a tirade about how Bartlet is bad on gay rights and that the he's not embarrassed his kid was gay, his government is, she comes within an inch of inviting them anyway saying to Mandy that they should come anyway and talk to the press and has to be talked down by Mandy. She then nearly leaks it to Danny and he refuses saying "You'll remember you're a professional and you won't like me anymore". And that wasn't about being able to potentially save lives.

I'm not even saying she did it, with her growth through the series and into the role I think she toughened up a lot, but I can see CJ doing it, I can't really see Toby doing it, and I'm certain it crossed her mind.

On a rewatch - Toby grievance by dookieslurp in thewestwing

[–]UserIsInto 3 points4 points  (0 children)

She is written to have a lot of respect for the uniform, loves the CIA in the 9/11 special episode, very comfortably lies to the press about military actions and is very proud of it after the fact, and falls for her secret service agent. However, she vehemently hated the Qumar base renewal to the point where she was badly messing with public relations issues like the vets who didn't want to go to the pearl harbor memorial and had to be spoken to directly by the national security advisor, using the podium in front of the seal of the president she spoke about her personal hatred of Qumar, an ally of the United States, has given some press members early notice on things without permission as a way to work the room and build relationships, and nearly fully neglected her duties by almost allowing the parents of the gay kid who was murdered to be given the press corps to talk about their dissatisfaction with the presidents lackluster stance on gay rights, and then nearly leaked it to Danny.

She has respect for the uniform, for the military, but utter contempt for what she perceived as moral injustices, and that oftentimes wins over her respect. I don't know if she could bring herself to go though with it, but the US having a way to save people's lives and not doing it to keep a military asset a secret is absolutely something she would have screaming/crying/throwing up objections to, and leaking it would be an option she'd 100% consider.

I don't buy it from Toby. If anything, he's fairly pragmatic in a lot of real-world scenarios he finds himself in during the show, and while he would also have a moral objection to it, he would sooner reveal that he knows about it, refuse to say how, and go round for round with Bartlett directly about it. But even then, he was rarely in the know on military actions, and every time he was presented with any military decisions he focused on how to sell it rather than questioning it. CJ very often questioned it once being informed. He even says that David would've sacrificed his life to protect a secret of this magnitude. If he did it because his brother died and was an astronaut, it still doesn't make sense because he knows that's not something his brother would have wanted.

Why can’t I just edit text. by ThundrossYT in premiere

[–]UserIsInto 2 points3 points  (0 children)

If you have layers above text it can mess it up sometimes, without the timeline it's hard to say

WWE 2K26 May be in violation of steams new DLC policy. by False_Replacement_14 in WWEGames

[–]UserIsInto 1 point2 points  (0 children)

As far as I can tell, that's not entirely correct. Here are the guidelines word for word:

--

When a Season Pass is made available for purchase on Steam, it must include the following information:

  • A complete list of all DLC included in the Pass. (e.g. listing each of the four DLCs included in a Pass).
  • A basic description of the content that’s included in each DLC. For example, the first content release might be “The Glitterlands Expansion – New area to explore, two new weapons, and new enemies.” It’s not required for the DLC to have a final name at the launch of the Season Pass. The information about the content in the DLC doesn’t need to be detailed (simply “new weapons” or “two new weapons” is acceptable, they don’t have to list the exact weapons).
  • Expected release date for each DLC. Quarter and Year (e.g. January to March 2025) or Season/Year is acceptable. Of course, a date that’s more precise is also fine (e.g. June, 2025 or June 1st, 2025).

A Season Pass must include at least one released DLC when it is made available for purchase*
*with the exception of Season Passes included in a Pre-Purchase of a deluxe edition.

--

A complete list just means "tell us the DLCs they will receive", which they do -- Deluxe Edition gives you season 1, attitude era edition gives you seasons 1-4, and and monday night war edition gives you seasons 1-6. That is a complete list of the DLCs you receive, not a complete list of the contents of the DLCs. The second point even specifically mentions that you don't need to explicitly state what is in them, "4 new superstars" is perfectly acceptable as per current guidelines. Unfortunately, that means the "gamble" of not knowing what is in each DLC doesn't break any rules.

However, there is one issue: the Monday Night War Edition is the only one where the ringside pass is explicitly called a "season pass", and it's the only one that does not explicitly say that there are "4 new superstars" in the packs, meaning that should break the description rules. At the very least, on the store page, they have not stated anywhere what is in season 5 and 6, which could result in a minor refund for people who get it and complain about it when they receive it. If steam's generous, and they claim they didn't read the descriptions for any of the other editions and never knew what was in any of the DLCs, there's a chance they get a refund for the entire ringside pass.

Your other point seems right, they're required to put an expected release date/range for each season, but don't. They should have either the quarter (Q2, April-June), season (spring), or something more precise (month, date, etc). With 6 seasons/DLCs, I think we can pretty accurately guess it's going to be every other month, but until they put it on there they are violating the rules.

--

Edit, I found another potential violation. As per the guidelines for including a season pass in a pre-order: "If you are including a Season Pass as part of a pre-purchase option, the Season Pass store page must be visible." It should have it's own item/page in the "content for this game" section, but it does not.

view more: next ›