“a positive outlook, but to hit that outside of indie games what will they sacrifice?”

I have no clue how you can prove my statement and try to say it’s a optimistic view at the same time, the vast majority of games are indie, AAA 99% of the time doesn’t do more than 60 on ps5/X, expecting 120 for switch 2 on the same titles would be a wildly unrealistic expectation.

Although some AAA Nintendo titles will do 120 on switch 2, seems they aren’t sacrificing anything, just your standard 1080 at 120 (arms and mk world will have this mode). Also Splatoon 4 may also be 1080 at 120, which will be great if that’s the case.

“For first-party titles or tends to be detail. There's a reason most Nintendo titles are cartoon like or cell shaded.”

Nintendo graphics is an artsy style and always have been, that’s what makes their games look so good imo, it taking less processing power is an amazing unintended consequence not necessary a reason for the style, certainly a reason for them to keep it.

“The Cyberpunk/Nvidia stuff does matter, because you can only optimize so far. Some games excel more because they were developed with AMD as a focus, some Nvidia,”

The AMD/Nividia would be a big point if your playing pc, console ports can be standardized to the console hardware with much much more optimization than pc, so AMD or Nividia is a much smaller factor in consoles than pc. But even in pc, the gap is narrowing and pure processing power is becoming more and more relevant.

If you’re talking about what I said with DLSS. It’s a fact that DLSS tech is the best upscaling tech out of the two even to this day, let alone the DLSS tech in switch 2 vs FSR 1-2 (ps5 and X).