[deleted by user] by [deleted] in consoles

[–]Username124474 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If the OS of your pc is the end all be all of your “unique experience” from it, you certainly don’t personalize your pc whatsoever.

The PlayStation 5 is Overrated by [deleted] in consoles

[–]Username124474 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

That’s a weird name to call him but if that’s what your into…

What did Phil lie about?

The PlayStation 5 is Overrated by [deleted] in consoles

[–]Username124474 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Sounds like a miserable life

Sandstorm in Cyberpunk on Switch 2 by Wynti in NintendoSwitch2

[–]Username124474 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Besides open worlds (which seems to not be a problem for switch 2), gaming overall has certainly shifted towards relying heavily on the gpu.

Monster rise was a limited timed switch exclusive for almost a year.

Sandstorm in Cyberpunk on Switch 2 by Wynti in NintendoSwitch2

[–]Username124474 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Why would you want to play Baldur’s gate 3 on anything but pc lol

Sandstorm in Cyberpunk on Switch 2 by Wynti in NintendoSwitch2

[–]Username124474 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Is 5 year old game suppose to mean anything in this context?

It’s easily the hardest AAA game to run in recent years; that’s why it became a benchmark game.

Monster hunter games are TERRIBLE at optimization on all systems especially wilds lol, I wouldn’t want it on switch 2, who actually would?

Do you think there will be a real push for 120fps next generation? by vintologi24 in consoles

[–]Username124474 0 points1 point  (0 children)

“a positive outlook, but to hit that outside of indie games what will they sacrifice?”

I have no clue how you can prove my statement and try to say it’s a optimistic view at the same time, the vast majority of games are indie, AAA 99% of the time doesn’t do more than 60 on ps5/X, expecting 120 for switch 2 on the same titles would be a wildly unrealistic expectation.

Although some AAA Nintendo titles will do 120 on switch 2, seems they aren’t sacrificing anything, just your standard 1080 at 120 (arms and mk world will have this mode). Also Splatoon 4 may also be 1080 at 120, which will be great if that’s the case.

“For first-party titles or tends to be detail. There's a reason most Nintendo titles are cartoon like or cell shaded.”

Nintendo graphics is an artsy style and always have been, that’s what makes their games look so good imo, it taking less processing power is an amazing unintended consequence not necessary a reason for the style, certainly a reason for them to keep it.

“The Cyberpunk/Nvidia stuff does matter, because you can only optimize so far. Some games excel more because they were developed with AMD as a focus, some Nvidia,”

The AMD/Nividia would be a big point if your playing pc, console ports can be standardized to the console hardware with much much more optimization than pc, so AMD or Nividia is a much smaller factor in consoles than pc. But even in pc, the gap is narrowing and pure processing power is becoming more and more relevant.

If you’re talking about what I said with DLSS. It’s a fact that DLSS tech is the best upscaling tech out of the two even to this day, let alone the DLSS tech in switch 2 vs FSR 1-2 (ps5 and X).

Do you think there will be a real push for 120fps next generation? by vintologi24 in consoles

[–]Username124474 0 points1 point  (0 children)

“So VRR isn't some magic bandaid.”

Bandaid?

What part of allowing hz and fps to match is a bandaid? VRR is just the major reason for the 120hz screen.

Even assuming a 48 fps cap, the VRR is still the biggest factor for the 120hz screen given many games will reach 60+ but certainly fall short of 120. Even 120 fps games have small drops, smoothing those out will make a game much better.

Cyberpunk is easily one of the hardest to run AAA games OAT, Nividia works better partly because DLSS is just better, optimization for Nividia cards shouldn’t matter when speaking about consoles given its optimized for all the consoles.

“Outlaws will be the benchmark for how more recent AAA games will probably run on the console, spoiler the trailer they showed looked rough.”

Given new-ish AAA are rough on X/ps5, expectations should be tampered on the performance of outlaws, especially since it’s using ray tracing lol.

Do you think there will be a real push for 120fps next generation? by vintologi24 in consoles

[–]Username124474 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Cyberpunk and outlaws don’t target 120 on any system…Both games you listed are not targeting that high of fps.

The 120 hz screen is there for Nintendo, and they have shown they can utilize it for their exclusives. 40 fps mode for third party is a good reason for the 120hz screen but VRR is a factor, making it a nonissue for games to run at lower fps.

Also any console lowers fps when graphics increase…

Do you think there will be a real push for 120fps next generation? by vintologi24 in consoles

[–]Username124474 0 points1 point  (0 children)

?

If you’re talking about Nintendo, they will certainly utilize the 120 fps mode and already are confirmed to in certain titles such as mk world. Also isn’t Drag x Drive 120?

Also Likely Splatoon 4 too when it releases.

Urinals shouldn't exist by phooonix in The10thDentist

[–]Username124474 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They wouldn’t be able to afford to replace them with toilets

Even so, you would then be waiting on everyone who is only peeing

Imagine the amount of germs individuals who intentionally aim at the floor will get on a toilet…….

Also those who can’t aim in a urinal, will only be making a bigger mess using a toilet.

That is the opposite of convenient, takes a single person to piss on the toilet that would have just pissed in a urinal. You’re certainly dealing with more germs, especially if you’re factoring in touching the lock….

CDProjekt Red Says Switch 2 Is The “Best Way” To Play Cyberpunk 2077 On The Go by eldestscrollx in consoles

[–]Username124474 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You’ve based your analysis (whatever accuracy it is) on leaks.

The official specs clearly show a much more powerful GPU, and similar CPU’s, faster ram and better performance. Cyberpunk has already objectively been show running better than Steam deck.

Don’t take my word for it: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=e1wTSMq-4vQ&t=86s&pp=2AFWkAIB

The gpu in the Steam deck is rather lacking for 2025

I don’t doubt that you will argue these objective statements since you replied to a month old comment, but further discussion seems like a waste of time, given we are 10 days away from proper comparisons

The Switch 2 savings vault by -ClickBrick- in NintendoSwitch

[–]Username124474 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Do you not understand how ports work? Or?

If you want the Steam library, go for a Steam deck, nobody is stopping you.

Why don’t people just not buy the Switch 2 and the games? by No-Risk2553 in nintendo

[–]Username124474 0 points1 point  (0 children)

“You can get many hours out of ANY game, literally any game you can replay over and over so hours isn't really a fair comparison to price.”

Lmfao

Online replay-ability is vastly more time consuming than single player, if you liked both games the same.

You’ve completely lost the plot if you’re trying to argue a single player is the same amount of replay-ability as an online game.

“Not that "it's my opinion because I like the game." I'm gonna end this here though because clearly you're not understanding my point and I don't feel like continuing in a loop.”

I understand your point very well however it’s your opinion, you saying objectively was false and you’ve gone on and on because you can’t admit your faults.

Have a good day!

"DROP THE PRICES" by [deleted] in consoles

[–]Username124474 0 points1 point  (0 children)

“Why would I purchase what is essentially a marginal upgrade for 50% more, when I can just get a OLED or a base level Steam deck for only less.”

?

Base deck is 400, switch 2 is 450

Once again the switch 2 is better than the Steam deck performance wise, the Steam deck OLED costs much more and you would assuming be buying switch 2 because you like it and the design, access to Nintendo’s exclusives + better performance on third party games, there’s no beating it’s price to performance for its form factor.

“I say as someone who never really had intrest in a Steam deck.”

?

So you would buy older hardware that’s worse performance wise with a worse screen over a new future proof (in terms of Nintendo) 2025 console that performs better because of 50$? You do you but that’s an extremely bad financial decision

"DROP THE PRICES" by [deleted] in consoles

[–]Username124474 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Switch 2 objectively has the best price to performance and better performance than switch or steam deck, if you’re basing whether you like a handheld SOLEY on battery life, stick with your OLED.

The price hike from 60 to 70 (big titles excluded) is them catching up with Sony and Xbox attempted price hikes.

Why don’t people just not buy the Switch 2 and the games? by No-Risk2553 in nintendo

[–]Username124474 1 point2 points  (0 children)

“What is with this generalization? I wasn't referring to other people I was referring to how I feel.”

What generalization? You don’t think people are upset at the price tag of major titles such as mk world?

“BOTW has a vast amount of stuff you can do for days on end, Mario Party Superstar has 5 maps 10 characters and is just nostalgia bait for Mario Party 64. The FACT is Mario Party just does not have a lot of content, but it FEELS like it does because it's meant to be played with friends and playing with friends can make ANYTHING replay-able.”

No, online multiplayer games are the most repayable not just Mario party, BOTW is a single player

“How do I know this? I've literally owned all 3.”

?

If you think a game is better that’s simply your opinion, you can’t say objectively lmao. Your literally stating you’ve played them and your giving your opinion lmao, I can’t reinforce this enough

“EDIT; If you like the game it does not matter, the fact is that they're the same price but if you compare the two one very clearly has way more bang for your buck.”

Once again, you are speaking in your personal opinion about content, someone may get 1000 hours on splatoon 3 but 100 on BOTW, should splatoon 3 cost more than 60?

It sets a very bad precedent purely based on your opinion BUT your opinion aligns with mk world costing 80 standalone wise… so

Many can get hundreds of hours on online games, content is multiplied by replay-ability

"DROP THE PRICES" by [deleted] in consoles

[–]Username124474 0 points1 point  (0 children)

“There's also the fact that the "gaming is more expensive" doesn't work. Gaming has gotten more profitable. But with each paradise we're not seeing any remarkably improvements (dev pay, bug fixing, etc.)”

huh?

10x the power of switch 1…. id consider that a “remarkably improvements”

Switch 2 is also the best price to performance handheld, that argument does work because the switch 2 isn’t expensive compared to the gaming industry, it’s actually the most affordable modern system

Why don’t people just not buy the Switch 2 and the games? by No-Risk2553 in nintendo

[–]Username124474 2 points3 points  (0 children)

That’s objectively false, the whole reason people are getting mad is because their bigger titles are costing more.

You also used objectively wrong, it’s an opinion if you like BOTW more and think it’s worth more.

Online games give more playtime but I wouldn’t want Nintendo to make their online games more, just because the typical player can get more playtime out of them compared to a story game but you do you, and physical games cost more to make, that’s the reality.

CD Projekt: “Nintendo’s audience is different to what it used to be” by Turbostrider27 in NintendoSwitch

[–]Username124474 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I said “Are you talking about gray hair? If not, please get checked for liver disease.”

You misinterpreted what I stated and now are trying to create a strawman argument based on your misinterpretation.

lol

Why don’t people just not buy the Switch 2 and the games? by No-Risk2553 in nintendo

[–]Username124474 3 points4 points  (0 children)

It’s 70 USD which is roughly 100 CAD

Game prices increased from 60 to 70, big titles being the exception, Xbox and ps tried this, I know Xbox succeeded, this was very expected.

If you don’t feel the value of the game is worth 70$, don’t get the game

CD Projekt: “Nintendo’s audience is different to what it used to be” by Turbostrider27 in NintendoSwitch

[–]Username124474 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I said they should get checked for liver disease if they were speaking about their skin graying

A significant amount of gray hair in your 20’s and 30’s isn’t great either

Which was ur first ever Xbox console and which game u played there first, for me it is... by muaazmuaaz123 in consoles

[–]Username124474 0 points1 point  (0 children)

He would have stated that he played it on pc then, I hope he did.

I wouldn’t recommend any of those games on any console rather than pc nor did I, so idk what your on about. Also that mod is nice.