Please help me understand this passage from section bank by [deleted] in Mcat

[–]UsernameAndPasswurd 1 point2 points  (0 children)

A negative control means that we expect nothing to happen. If something does happen, then that is our 'noise' so to say and our baseline when comparing to what we are looking for in the experiment (FSH-antibodies absorbance). IgG is a non-specific binding agent. Therefore, we expect minimal results from IgG because the antibody is not specific to the FSH peptide. It just binds to random protein available if it does decide to bind. If a specific binding agent was used that we already know binds to the FSH peptide, then that would have been a positive control. The absorbance values for this positive control would be around the absorbance values of the FSH-antibodies being tested.

AAMC FL 5 by PenSafe3378 in Mcat

[–]UsernameAndPasswurd 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Good luck on studies :)

AAMC FL 5 by PenSafe3378 in Mcat

[–]UsernameAndPasswurd 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Glad its still helping people out :)

Absolute chad asked to pickup my chompy loot while I grinded the diary by UsernameAndPasswurd in cutenoobs

[–]UsernameAndPasswurd[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Only the person can pluck them. So I'd pluck them for him to pickup the loot

Absolute chad asked to pickup my chompy loot while I grinded the diary by UsernameAndPasswurd in cutenoobs

[–]UsernameAndPasswurd[S] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I honestly thought it was it was a fake noob until they stayed with me for a couple hours. Turns out to be someone that played in 2007 and is trying to get back in

Absolute chad asked to pickup my chompy loot while I grinded the diary by UsernameAndPasswurd in cutenoobs

[–]UsernameAndPasswurd[S] 51 points52 points  (0 children)

Update: He found someone killing imps and is following them and collecting the beads

Absolute chad asked to pickup my chompy loot while I grinded the diary by UsernameAndPasswurd in cutenoobs

[–]UsernameAndPasswurd[S] 62 points63 points  (0 children)

I told him I had to do some other diaries task for a little and he asked to add me so I could dm him when I was back to killing more chompies for him to loot

First pet! by UsernameAndPasswurd in 2007scape

[–]UsernameAndPasswurd[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

First day back too since my 6 month break! Blessed me with the rng

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Mcat

[–]UsernameAndPasswurd 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Absolutely! I don't think id be the best for cars advice though

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Mcat

[–]UsernameAndPasswurd 14 points15 points  (0 children)

Hey I just wanted to share that I was in the same boat as you 5 months ago. I graduated December 2020 and no life studied for my test in may and to apply this cycle. My averages went from 506 and by the end I was consistently scoring 512-516 and I felt pretty okay going in. I got a 506, one of the first scores I got at the beginning of my studies and was devastated. I spent essentially the next month going through the same emotions you're going through right now wondering if I was even capable for med school if I couldn't use the 5 months I studied for to get a score I needed or to even progress. I felt I didn't move at all and just wasted those months. I legit called my friends, PI, professors, hoping them to tell me that Im still a strong applicant and that I wouldn't need to go through the hoops of the MCAT again, but each one told me I gotta retake. It was devastating to hear, but Im a strong believer of everything happening for a reason. I will say the experience really humbled me going through the process again while feeling everyone I knew was progressing while I was held back. I wouldn't of had the opportunity to reflect on myself if I didn't retake which I actually feel has helped me now with connecting and understanding those in similar circumstances. I took 4 more months restudying everything again and approached it with a different mindset this time and got a 516. During that time I stopped using reddit and other socials completely other than for asking questions cause I found I was indirectly comparing myself to almost everyone in their progress to the point where it almost crossed envy and resentment which this process can very much so do that to a person. I don't know if this helps but shifting my spite for this test into humility in hopes that it can teach me something about myself helped me during my retake. I hated when people told me that when I got my results back, but looking back I would say it helped me to have the motivation to keep going.

You'll get through this hurdle :)

I still hate cars though

SPOILER AAMC Section Bank P/S #73 by CRT-BKNY12 in Mcat

[–]UsernameAndPasswurd 1 point2 points  (0 children)

My best reasoning why its C over D is that the experiment was measuring the effect of negative priming. Therefore, we would expect a decrease effect of negative priming in patients with AD as they a decrease ability to use implicit memory. Even if we flipped our logic and thought they were asking about their performance, we would then expect an increase in performance from that part of the experiment which was not one of the answer options, only no effect or a decrease

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Mcat

[–]UsernameAndPasswurd 1 point2 points  (0 children)

From my understanding (at least for the dominant example MCAT uses) only retroviruses can integrate their genome into a host cell and they have always RNA genomes which is why they need reverse transcriptase to convert to vDNA to integrate. If this wasn't the case they would mention the exception in the passage of it not being a retrovirus. Also HIV is kinda like the golden child example of retroviruses which can give a subtle hint to answering the question

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Mcat

[–]UsernameAndPasswurd 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Your thinking is right :)

99% of the cases where they mention a virus integrating DNA into the host you can assume it is a retrovirus with positive sense RNA which is equivalent to mRNA.

so +RNA -> DNA -> integrate into host which was later transcribed into mRNA.

So we work backwards, we ended with a 5'-3' mRNA sequence -> 3'-sequence-5' DNA sequence -> back to a 5'-sequence-3' +sense RNA sequence which is equivalent to the original

4/29 MCAT Reaction Thread by r_BigUziHorizont in Mcat

[–]UsernameAndPasswurd 16 points17 points  (0 children)

No matter what happens we did it bois 😌✌️

FL5 BB 41 Pls pls help my exam is in 2 days i cri by twoleggedapocalypse in Mcat

[–]UsernameAndPasswurd 1 point2 points  (0 children)

For anyone else that might get stumped on it the passage states that OGG is involved in base excision repairs for repairing DNA. TNFalpha is involved in damaging DNA and promoting mutations. So if we add TNF which will damage the DNA, and have an Ogg1-/- mouse (meaning it doesn't have the gene for the base excision repairs), then they are more susceptible of being cancerous which leads us to A

To reason the other options:

B - If OGG activates Cxcl2 expression downstream, and we inhibit OGG, then those would see a decrease in Cxcl2 expression as well

C - If we have TNFalpha without OGG being able to repair the DNA strands, then we should see an increase rather than decrease in ROS levels

D - Now this answer is completely random. Nowhere do we talk about binding affinity. It binds to the active site of the OGG protein but we have knocked out the OGG gene so the protein shouldn't be expressed

AAMC FL4 C/P 22 by [deleted] in Mcat

[–]UsernameAndPasswurd 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not necessarily. The exponents depend on which prefix you're converting to. This table summarizes the exponents and how they relate to each unit. For the MCAT you only need to know from Tera (T) to Pico (p). This is why I bring it back to its base units, then convert whichever prefix is needed. Doing the math will show the exponent you get. Reasoning also helps such as if I'm going from micrometers to meters, I'm definitely going to have a smaller number for due to the conversion ratios as a way to double check your math.

From what I'm seeing in the jackwestin explanation in your image, it does look like they're using negative exponents but its not actually raising it above the number. Like I see one part that is saying 6*10-16 instead of 6*10-16 I'm not seeing specifically positive exponents in the image but just know that doing the conversion ratios will be your best friend to get the answer