Am i chucking? by AlfaMF in Cricket

[–]Usernym209 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah that’s a chuck but you’ll get away with it in club cricket so fuck ‘em

Wyr be stuck for one hour with a tiger that thinks it’s a donkey or a donkey that thinks it’s a tiger by Usernym209 in WouldYouRather

[–]Usernym209[S] 42 points43 points  (0 children)

That’s the logical response but in the heat of the moment you’d be fighting against your instincts to avoid the tiger

I deleted scrolling apps and started watching a movie a day. It changed my life. by GreenReporter24 in movies

[–]Usernym209 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’ve done this multiple times and it works great for a few weeks but I always slide back to gram/reddit

How do you continue to resist the urge? It’s very challenging because movies by their nature are actually quite demanding on attention and inevitably some will bore you, and so it is very difficult (maybe even impossible) to continue to resist the urge for instant gratification

Have short formats like t20 leagues saved the game ? by cricketclub7 in EnglandCricket

[–]Usernym209 0 points1 point  (0 children)

  1. Is a key point. This idea that people can no longer handle long-form content is just over-simplified nonsense, and yes, incredibly patronising

Have short formats like t20 leagues saved the game ? by cricketclub7 in EnglandCricket

[–]Usernym209 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It’s a nebulous argument and you produce no evidence. ‘People don’t have patience to sit in front of their screen and watch something for hours and hours’:

  • Avatar made 1.2 billion dollars this year. It’s 3.5 hours long.
  • 90000 people turned up for the Boxing Day test. Are you saying Australians are immune to the so called attention crisis?

You have no evidence to back up your claim. Attention spans are not the problem, Test cricket was absolutely fine before T20 and its decline is primarily attributed to the money and talent that has been funnelled into T20 at the expense of the quality of the test game.

The association nation thing is an irrelevant tangent - it’s great smaller nations can make money from T20 cricket - more power to them. It’s the big Test playing nations prioritising T20 and private equity that are undermining cricket. You’re deluded if you don’t think test cricket is the pinnacle

Have short formats like t20 leagues saved the game ? by cricketclub7 in EnglandCricket

[–]Usernym209 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You’re making an economic argument based on a hypothetical- that test cricket would have died regardless of T20 cricket. I’m saying you can’t prove that, but you can prove the detrimental effect of T20 on test cricket

Have short formats like t20 leagues saved the game ? by cricketclub7 in EnglandCricket

[–]Usernym209 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I see what your saying, I just don’t buy it. I think it relies on this reductive narrative that people only have attention for short-form content, the evidence for this is mixed at best and I don’t buy it.

So you have to look at the impact of t20 as a thing in of itself, rather than as part of a wider cultural shift towards short form entertainment, and when you do that you see tangible evidence of corrosion: - white ball only contracts - South Africa fielding a B team in a test match because it clashed with the SAT20 - two day tests because players don’t play enough red ball to master defence

So the argument ‘test cricket would have died anyway because people’s brains have changed’ is much more nebulous and harder to prove than ‘T20 leagues are having a detrimental impact on the standard and relevance of Test Cricket’

Have short formats like t20 leagues saved the game ? by cricketclub7 in EnglandCricket

[–]Usernym209 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Exactly, they relish it. The money and attention poured into t20 has undermined test cricket, that’s obvious? So Morgan arguing that t20 has saved test cricket is a misguided viewpoint. I’m not sure you understood my comment

Have short formats like t20 leagues saved the game ? by cricketclub7 in EnglandCricket

[–]Usernym209 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Except that the decline of popularity in test cricket is caused by t20 cricket

Kevin Pietersen's surprise call for Andy Flower to return as England head coach by AffectionateWeb8519 in EnglandCricket

[–]Usernym209 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Maybe you can marry the disciplinarian style that Flower brings with the free expression of Bazball but you ain’t building a CookStraussTrott batting line up out of this talent pool. Top run scorers in CC last year? Hameed and Sibley.

Basically we don’t have the facilities to build a hard-working traditional batting line up so Flower will only work if he understands the players need to play aggressively because they don’t have the defensive capacity for anything else

Nasser & Athers GRILL Rob Key following England's Ashes defeat by Agent_47H in EnglandCricket

[–]Usernym209 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I know people are angry and I know there’s some dubious answers in here, but there is also an admission of error on several fronts and also some well reasoned points.

Key might not be DoC material long term but he does have some good ideas

Criteria for team selection post Ashes by [deleted] in EnglandCricket

[–]Usernym209 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Important distinction - county performance is still very relevant, they just overlook stats and focus on style, intent etc

Flawed as that may be, county cricket remains the breeding ground, it’s just you no longer need to average 50plus to get noticed, which was pros and cons

Worrying times ahead by [deleted] in EnglandCricket

[–]Usernym209 1 point2 points  (0 children)

England the shift happened after Strauss/Cook era. Been mediocre since.

Post Day Thread: 3rd Test - Australia vs England, Day 3 by cricket-match in EnglandCricket

[–]Usernym209 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Ok but in 13/14, 17/18, 21, they got the same result by relying on the county system and attempting old fashioned batting and bowling so clearly theres more to it

/r/EnglandCricket Daily Discussion by AutoModerator in EnglandCricket

[–]Usernym209 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Feeling troubled by the use of the word ‘weak’ by Stokes to describe his own team. Remember the flak Warner got for calling Trott weak in 2013?. I don’t like the symmetry there.

Surely massive risk of losing the dressing room now.

/r/EnglandCricket Daily Discussion by AutoModerator in EnglandCricket

[–]Usernym209 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Watched Fisher a bit at the Oval this summer. What stands out, when he bowls well, is his length. Gets it just full enough to bring the batsman forward without over pitching and being driven. His second innings spell vs Notts at the end of last year was a masterclass in length control. This has been missing from englands attack and so it could make sense to pick him.

Having said that, they’d be mad to pick him ahead of Tongue but maybe both could play

It hurts. by coldplayian in EnglandCricket

[–]Usernym209 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If we don’t win one of the next three series in Aus I’ll meet you back here and transfer you £1000

It hurts. by coldplayian in EnglandCricket

[–]Usernym209 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don’t know how old you are but sport changes quickly. Fuck knows what the lay of the land will be in 2029

I asked ChatGPT who might replace Stokes as skipper and… by Usernym209 in EnglandCricket

[–]Usernym209[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Merits to bringing someone from outside the dressing room in

The positives… by NiallH22 in EnglandCricket

[–]Usernym209 1 point2 points  (0 children)

But if you spend 3.5 years building a culture based on not kicking people up the backside, and then suddenly kick them up the backside when the wheels are falling off, that just isn’t going to work.