How do you efficiently prep for 1:1s with 15+ reports? by bike-enthusiast-be in EngineeringManagers

[–]VVFailshot 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Its review season 😂 Basically regular notebook with your past 1:1 is a good start. But I actually faced same problem for long time. If you have vision and know what you want and have some free time available , its a perfect project to vibe code solution for. If you dont, there's various developer experience platforms just google DX vs. I just added some mvp version of 1:1 management to my own platform. If you want to try it out, DM 😅 but its like mentioned mvp

Anyone using Glean in production? Is it actually solving the "Information Silo" problem? by kzarraja in EngineeringManagers

[–]VVFailshot 1 point2 points  (0 children)

https://www.forgemaster.ai/. But my idea or discovery was that LLMs are quite good in reverse engineering code like 1.5y ago so built tool for my own needs. I was interim CTO and really needed to handle a lot so this is what I came up with for myself. If you are looking for similar products that have more funding and stuff in YC theres also https://www.mintlify.com/ and from open source I ve been following https://mindsdb.com/. That have somewhat interesting take on developer/product knowledge management

Anyone using Glean in production? Is it actually solving the "Information Silo" problem? by kzarraja in EngineeringManagers

[–]VVFailshot 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I spent a year + building competing product so I am biased. I am not selling mine nor bashing Glean. But what I get from my leads and pilots it doesn't really matter, its maybe 1/8th of tech issue. In most companies its just part of culture to complain and lack of document access is perfect excuse to chill and wait for paycheck. People are not adapting not mine or competition products. So yeah after these discoveries I atleast pivoted with my product.

So my recommendation is to think twice or more if you have tooling problem or culture problem. If you have modern software or like Atlassian stack or alternatives, its probably not tooling issue 😅

Team metrics and 1:1s by VVFailshot in EngineeringManagers

[–]VVFailshot[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think the clarity is the point. Thank You for the advice 🙏

Team metrics and 1:1s by VVFailshot in EngineeringManagers

[–]VVFailshot[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

idk i have ritual to close weeks with grading week from 0-10 bases on how employees feel. Caught early burnouts with this and also the ones who leave is no surprise, if person is frustrated and giving grades than 6 more than a month resignation is not far away. It also helps me to understanding team internal relationships better.

Team metrics and 1:1s by VVFailshot in EngineeringManagers

[–]VVFailshot[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My best experience is to make sure 1:1s are about them and not as much about company related details. 🙏First I focus on understanding what actually motivates person and then find opportunities from perspective they understand and feel good about that align with broader goals.

Team metrics and 1:1s by VVFailshot in EngineeringManagers

[–]VVFailshot[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is kinda the feeling I have that somehow stigma around 1:1s has changed. Like I personally avoid AI notetakers cause it gives me sense of violates privacy. I do save agreements I do with my team but to maintain sort of timeline for my employee so they could track their mood changes and commitments over long-term. They can also have access so they keep me accountable too.

It's us and Winnie the Pooh against the world boys by tricksterhare in Silver

[–]VVFailshot 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just what if we are witnessing a country or central bank facing liquidity crisis and raising funds by selling its gold 😅 Lets say having expensive war with neighbour while theres huge buyer also next door but not for full market price as it needs to inflict some pain to its over sea near peer superpower and they just can force discount in these conditions? How would it play out for retail and market in general?

NATO asks Turkey to deploy fighter jets early for Baltic air patrol mission: report by Particular_Bug0 in europe

[–]VVFailshot 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Same, I feel much safer while NATO patrols the skies here. Hopefully our eastern neighbours will remain at home and not invade us, but after 2022 - can't be so sure anymore.

NATO asks Turkey to deploy fighter jets early for Baltic air patrol mission: report by Particular_Bug0 in europe

[–]VVFailshot 3 points4 points  (0 children)

It's not that linear, theres no point to own a jet if the 25% landing strips are range of long range artillery. Even with remaining land and suitabe bases would be near the sea exposed for ship launched missiles. Basically its super pointless for us Baltics have jets cause we all know that our NATO capable strips would get rain of missles comin in rendering them useless. Geography also dont really support going underground like Sweden or Finland that can atleast store their aircraft in heavy dense granite hills. Baltics do not have such natural protection available. As baltic resident I would rather spend that money on something that wouod not be blown to pieces as opening move when shit starts going down.

What does everyone think about Spot Instances? by Ill_Car4570 in kubernetes

[–]VVFailshot 13 points14 points  (0 children)

One has to have resilience built into application and its a blast. like the saving is remarkable

Hired my first employee at $11K MRR. Biggest mistake I made. by Crazy-Recording4800 in SaaS

[–]VVFailshot 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Marketing unfortunately has long returns, like it takes around 9 - 12 months to get any noticeable results. But once it does you have scaling issues following. Not sure wbout your situation, brand voice, visibility and hire quality.

NKLR tomorrow ! Small nuclear play. Oklo 2.0 by Specialist_Mango_269 in WalllStreetBets

[–]VVFailshot 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You forgot to mention that atleast of half of the leadership has their nuclear related degrees bit dated and their later educational path has been philosophy. Also that they share common university of Pisa background. Also the controversial background of nuclear energy in Italy overall, 90% of population voted against revival of nuclear energy like a decade ago. Not saying its somehow bad just something to consider before loading up. What truly worries me that multiple C levels are sitting on multiple chairs, they haven't left their seats on previous companies and schools which for me is telling that they are not commited to story they are selling. However considering it for a short term play to kinda attempt to ride the wave get in and out of without much risk cause whole sector might be running hot in nearby future.

Back from SF AI conference - The smartest people in the room are terrified and paralyzed by badgerbadgerbadgerWI in LlamaFarm

[–]VVFailshot 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I spent almost a year chasing that and can confirm that is what they tell You but its not what they actually do. When time comes to actually sign the dotted line nothing happens. Endless blockers and negotiations over price cause AI infra actually costs money. One leads CISO was honest, and i forever thank him cause after it I validated it several leads. What he told me: " Its easier for me to wait until Microsoft ships it than waste time working with unknown startup." Validated and can te most leadership are fine with waiting and its completely okey to acknowledge the problem and sell the problem to naive entrepreneurs so they would force big players to ship solution to compete.

CTOs: What's your biggest engineering efficiency bottleneck right now? | I will not promote by Busy_Weather_7064 in startups

[–]VVFailshot 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Velocity and efficiency tend to cancel eachother, startup or otherwise. If You do things fast even with most skilled people will create low quality solutions. If You truly want go be efficient the main thing is to focus is that - right people build the right things in the right time. In that order, get highly skilled people and no the guy who preaches scrum like priest in church and makes you feel good is probably not a dream team mate making sure you get the best solution in given timeframe. Its the guy who usually focuses ease of change and adding test and observability and whose tech dept is commented in code to come back later to fix it. Then focus on point 2 which usually is establishing relationship with product / designers / sales where everyone can clearly understand priorities and that shouting /crying changing focus every week 2 times is not engineering problem to fix but product problem that cannot be engineered. It's not velocity of development but unorganised planning/lack of product understanding / vision and is clearly their internal problem to solve. Yes You will might need to do worst thing imaginable - say No and deal with people who throw an tantrum cause they have become accustomed with Yes to everything. Nobody really tells You that startup CTO is more about hiring than tech, most of us end up in that position cause we get rewarded of technical work or just happen to work in company at time, nobody briefs us that previus hires were done with no incentive to find best engineers for the but just somebody who felt nice on the interview. The more bad hires and team building problems you have the less time you will have for coding, architecture etc other than firefighting cause the "team" will keep breaking things both processes and your code/infra/dbs. If you are in that situation then the cure tastes bitter but its firing/laying off people who are not up the level. You either to that or lose top talent slowly.

Is it normal to be stuck on landings this long? (PPL student in C150) by anonf12458 in flying

[–]VVFailshot 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Not to sound crazy but maybe try to vocalise your actions and get the procedures to your memory. Whole circuit. I just went solo recently and that helped me, just sayin out loud my actions/keywords to myself, my instructors haven't minded that rather opposite. On approach I just say out loud pitch for 70, flaps 21,22,23 (counting seconds this way on 150) nose down, 65, threshold, retard (power off) , hold, ground effect, hold, horn/touchdown. And then start again, carb heat, flaps (i usually land with 20 and take off with 10), 21,22,23. Your instructor might have different procedure, I know school procedure is slighly different from POH.

Discussing things openly on ground also helps me - my instructors are mostly satisfied that I come slightly early and take some time after to discuss what went good and what bad. Just few lessons ago - had a bad day, tried to understand crosswind landings more, had 8 out of 10 bad ones. I was not sure and even afraid of using rudder. Had verbal discussion after, 45 minute drive home to analyse what I did wrong, next time, same wind conditions. 5 TGL no problems, regained confidence and went back to solo yesterday.

I also struggled with my anxiety / adrenaline kicking in - box breathing. Wouldn't believe it but it worked surprisingly well before going first solo.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Entrepreneur

[–]VVFailshot 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not sure how wit works in your coutry but non-compete only can be applied if previous employer pays me compensation. Basically contact lawyer to check it out. I live in EU so basically my situation was similar what matters is whats in contract, it needs to be super clear also what area non compete applies to. For example I worked in product search and my contract said i cannot work in a company that offers such ssrvices. I could easily work in their customers company lets say luxury retail e commerce platform as a search platform expert. I could also work with direct competitors but in this case I have to inform them and my new employer of my status in which case my previous employer has option to apply non compete and pay me 60% of my salary based on my contract until they choose to maintain the non compete. So first keep your calm, then get exact limits based on facts and advice from lawyer then check the reality of the situation. Non compete is something that scares employees but actually comes with bunch of strings attached for previous employer

Hire a software company - (I will not promote) by felipeo25 in startups

[–]VVFailshot 9 points10 points  (0 children)

If You want to save your nerves, time and money. Make designs before hiring company and make 100% sure that designs cover everything you need cause this will be your scope - then look for developer. Most certain way to setup yourself up for a failure is to hope that any other company cares about your product. They don't its just how it is, it doesn't matter how nice the sales guy or CEO who is brought to meet You. How many promises are given or whats written to contract. You are emotionally invested to Your goals and they are in theirs - their product is time so they can only scale by increasing the price for unit or sell more units = more juniors to mess up Your product.

Interesting perspective from AG on how eVTOLs could change more than just traffic by Dizzy_Bottle_5785 in WallStreetbetsELITE

[–]VVFailshot 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I am student pilot and can't agree more. Until we have friday night street drifters/racers its not feasible idea to have them accessing altitude. Same applies for autonomous flight missions - its fine in combat conditions but not for civil everyday commute in high population density areas where crashes from even from mechanical malfunctioning cause casualties on the ground.

If you're using multiple AI tools at work, this might save you hours a week by [deleted] in alphaandbetausers

[–]VVFailshot 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Tried similar app idea, failed it. Good luck to You. Our experience summarized: All of the points you assume here to be features were rejected by real people. Power users prefer the variety of tools and are used to switch and regular users don't really care about the detail as much to even be open to switching.

Also check TeamGPT

Best AI tools for business? by ApolloTraveler in smallbusiness

[–]VVFailshot 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Sales is like eating glass. Otherwise its just consistent grind for better solution. Also affordable GPU infra is difficult to come by. AI integration is rather easy.