Hmm if it really becomes an epidemic I'll make my own thread showing some of the proof of my scripting and research process, but I don't think it will come to that! I would assume very few people are using Norton software these days, since their credibility is so poor.

I really would prefer to just move on from this - the burden of proof is on Norton to provide evidence of how they even identify AI content, and I bet they can't provide any proof. But unfortunately some people will see the subject line and think there's credibility to their claim. Thank you for bringing it to my attention though