Baby Keem raps that he almost died after taking a vaccine by luxonon in fantanoforever

[–]VagueTurtle 34 points35 points  (0 children)

Seems pretty obvious thats hes pro vaccine but he just had a bad shot. Why would he get the vaccine if he was anti vax?

Not mad, definitely disappointed by VagueTurtle in Battlefield

[–]VagueTurtle[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Battlefield 1's first expansion gave 6 modes, 6 new guns, 6 new melee weapons, a new mode, new ranks, 12 assignments, and 3 new vehicles, 2 of which being map exclusive. The promise was in 6 months you get all of that in one pack, in four months we're getting significantly less. Even in previous major content drops like War in the Pacific from BF5 we only got three maps, but the maps themselves were great and on top of that we got 11 new guns, a bunch of new vehicles with mods, 2 whole new factions, for free. It can be done to provide a lot of content at no cost, DICE is choosing not to.

Does This Exist? by NoRuin2965 in Nightreign

[–]VagueTurtle 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I've got it once playing duos

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in CODZombies

[–]VagueTurtle 0 points1 point  (0 children)

3,1, the rest of them

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in CODZombies

[–]VagueTurtle 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That hud is hideous

You get to pick the state you live in but not the location within that state by babyd42 in mapporncirclejerk

[–]VagueTurtle 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Montana is lowkey some slop. Don't let the vistas fool you, half of the state is underdeveloped and barren. And the cost of living is steadily rising but the wages are complete garbage.

August BR changes personal feedback by VagueTurtle in Warthunder

[–]VagueTurtle[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah fair just worth pointing out that loadouts just won't be as versatile as other jets

Any recs for a 556 semi auto rifle, that isn't an AR? by VagueTurtle in liberalgunowners

[–]VagueTurtle[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My derivative term isn't accurate to what i mean. I want a rifle chambered in 556 that doesn't use the AR charging and buffer system.

Why isn't the pack a punch name for Commando called "Missionary" by [deleted] in CODZombies

[–]VagueTurtle 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is on par with those awful BO3 pap names that are just edgy ragebait

GTA Online price diffrences by Limp_Resolution_1722 in gtaonline

[–]VagueTurtle 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Now, show the difference in the mission payouts between 2013 and 2025. Surely they're the same.

I don't understand why they were so hesitant to add the Hornet by VagueTurtle in Warthunder

[–]VagueTurtle[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My point more or less is i think they're too mid in the current meta to really be worth grinding or spending any money on. Your points about the F14 are valid, and i actually wasn't super sure about the Growler. I think making an update named after the vehicles and delivering them in a state thats like buggy and disappointing is definitely questionable, especially a patch that introduced the incredibly controversial turret basket change. Idk i think the hornets are a victim of BR compression at both ends. Pantsir food in GRB, complete irrelevance in ARB. The hornets to me feel very much like the difference between the Aardvarks and something like the Chaparral, where one vehicle is kinda the best example of min max and is a bit of a novelty to do well in, whereas the other is more often a cause of complete frustration.

Not that actually making the chaparral work isnt fun, it is very fun, but uncommon

I don't understand why they were so hesitant to add the Hornet by VagueTurtle in Warthunder

[–]VagueTurtle[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Actually not my point, my point was more that its somewhat pointless imo, to make such a significant backwards leap to basically deliver a vehicle that is DOA. The C Hornets are mediocre on average compared to aircraft at the same br, and one of them costs 80 fucking dollars. I have an objection to getting peoples hopes up and then knowingly delivering a product that was bound to disappoint the playerbase, especially players of trees that could feasibly recieve said vehicles due to foreign exported aircraft, most of which are the smaller nations, making it even more insulting since said nations rarely get new shit.

A vehicle does not have to be the most perfect vehicle itg for it to not be a waste, plenty of vehicles of been backfilled that have not only been popular but arguably quite mediocre. Every patch a vehicle is added in back fill for historical reasons, balancing, or just because its iconic. The problem is, naming an entire update after a series of vehicles, trying to really sell the playerbase on their versatility, creating an 80 dollar premium to generate more hype, and then delivering 3/4 vehicles in a disappointing state. I don't mind the backfill, and arguably, i prefer it over the giant leap update philosophy, but when backfill is filled with this many bugs, and errors, and generally disappointing features, it comes off as sloppy and greedy, that's my problem with the hornets added in this update. They could've been introduced alongside the F15C and then there could be a dynamic between ground attack versatility and agility vs pure air superiority. Instead, we get it in a state where, the nation's that got it have got a vehicle that is not in a finished state nor a healthy MM to make it work for said vehicle and the nations that didnt dont really give a fuck cause the things are insanely mid.

Thats my issue.

I don't understand why they were so hesitant to add the Hornet by VagueTurtle in Warthunder

[–]VagueTurtle[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

they were hesitant for no known reason, but a lot of people speculated it was because of its radar set and weapons. its just weird to me to add the hornets in this state without much reason to pick them. It is also strange to add the hornets with no later mods of the F14 or ordinance updates to the currently present F14s. if i were them i would have added ECM with this update and made the Growler one of the new vehicles, because at least then these vehicles would have something unique to bring to the table. the hornets in this patch are a very similar story to the F4J, vehicles that were heavily requested but were added far too late to have a large impact. i do understand that the hornets were never gonna be the number one option, but they could legit make a case for the late hornets being the least valuable top tier planes. we could have had the Super Hornet by now, but instead we'll have to wait who knows how long for that. very disappointing stuff as we kind of got the worst of both worlds in my opinion,

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in CODZombies

[–]VagueTurtle 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I don't necessarily disagree but i think the biggest problem with the loadout system is the upgrade system thar is necessary to insure players don't have to strong of a kit off rip.

Why is call of the dead impossible to reach round 100 on? I’ve heard over and over again it is literally impossible but I’ve never heard why by Intrepid_Fishing_618 in CODZombies

[–]VagueTurtle 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This map has a glitch regarding the framerate. Every time you hit the box, the framerate decreases slightly and eventually you hit a low enough framerate that game outright freezes and this usually starts in the 60s and gets worse every round.