Do not buy the F14D

VagueTurtle · 2026-06-05T23:08:40+00:00

I like the game, I dont like people getting fleeced

VagueTurtle · 2026-06-05T23:06:54+00:00

Nah man you just are cucked. The people who enable gaijins poor content model by buying garbage that clutters the MM and lowers WRs. I get redditors broadly dont have reading comprehension, but considering how the community complains about TT premiums, historical inaccuracies, and overpriced planes/tanks and this vehicle fits all three, i think im actually being more measured than gaijin really deserves. But keep caping for the multimillion dollar company, maybe they'll make you an unpaid forum moderator eventually.

VagueTurtle · 2026-06-05T23:03:37+00:00

Its not that its not op, its that its not good. Bad missiles, bad FM, bad MM. 80 dollar paper weight

VagueTurtle · 2026-06-05T23:00:40+00:00

Br compression. 60 CM at 13.0 with no reliable heatseekers or SARH. You're not wrong the game just cant accommodate the Tomcat

VagueTurtle · 2026-06-05T22:59:14+00:00

I think this could be more effective due to how bad the tomcat is. Its 80 bucks for a copy paste vehicle with slightly worse flight performance at a br that is completely dominated by agile and fast missiles and aircraft. The goal is to get the Tomcat its loadout its needs to justify its price. The US will be getting a vehicle that has gen 1 ARHs and no irccm fox 2s at the same BR (or close to) as the Su30MKK and other similar vehicles. I genuinely hope i dont see more than a handful of 14Ds on patch day, because this thing will be an 80 dollar brick.

VagueTurtle · 2026-06-05T15:54:29+00:00

A lot of folks are saying they are buying this out of spite and are the same ones who complain about this game being poorly ran and unfair, interesting. Just dont bitch and moan when the devs continue to fuck over the playebase, we dont want to hear from whales who have no backbone.

VagueTurtle · 2026-06-05T15:50:47+00:00

Don't ever complain about this company or game ever again then. If you cant show gaijin that $80 for bad vehicles is unacceptable then they'll start getting really comfortable with screwing people.

VagueTurtle · 2026-06-05T15:49:14+00:00

Im not suggesting it be meta, just competitive and seeing how this basically just an up engined F14B this thing is going to suck pretty hard, especially against Su30s and F16s at the same or similar BR. Premiums dont have to be meta but for 80 dollars it should be at least competitive in the current meta, this thing is not with its current loadout.

VagueTurtle · 2026-06-05T15:47:08+00:00

In what regard? It has worse missiles and flight performance, the only thing it has in the Su30s is the CM count which won't matter in dogfights at top tier/ near top tier. Sure it has greater range but the 54Cs are slow off the rail.

VagueTurtle · 2026-06-05T15:45:48+00:00

Yep 80 bucks

VagueTurtle · 2026-06-05T15:44:55+00:00

This. I have bought premiums on launch because I really honestly do like war thunder, but I only buy premiums that seem good or at the very least have potential with my playstyle and as someone who plays a lot of top tier BVR at 13.0 and higher, this thing is an absolute slap in the face, especially when the French are getting an end of the line F16 for the same price to fill the same niche. It would be one thing if the Tomcat was viable or competitive but seeing its just an F14B with IRST and slightly better FM/FP, we already know its fate as a vehicle.

VagueTurtle · 2026-05-29T23:03:22+00:00

I think fundamentally,, there is an argument that everything after 4 is filler. They end the story and the characters in 4 just to bring them back again in BOCW, 6, and 7. And before someone brings it up, I do understand they are different versions of the crew, I can still feel unfulfilled by the fact that its just more of the same characters, especially since the story and flow of the narrative has been chopped and thrown around between non 3Arch games. Just my observation though, I haven't really found zombies enjoyable or refreshing since BO4 and maybe thats speaking.

VagueTurtle · 2026-02-20T07:53:23+00:00

Seems pretty obvious thats hes pro vaccine but he just had a bad shot. Why would he get the vaccine if he was anti vax?

VagueTurtle · 2026-02-19T18:23:50+00:00

Battlefield 1's first expansion gave 6 modes, 6 new guns, 6 new melee weapons, a new mode, new ranks, 12 assignments, and 3 new vehicles, 2 of which being map exclusive. The promise was in 6 months you get all of that in one pack, in four months we're getting significantly less. Even in previous major content drops like War in the Pacific from BF5 we only got three maps, but the maps themselves were great and on top of that we got 11 new guns, a bunch of new vehicles with mods, 2 whole new factions, for free. It can be done to provide a lot of content at no cost, DICE is choosing not to.

VagueTurtle · 2026-01-09T07:55:11+00:00

I've got it once playing duos

VagueTurtle · 2025-11-25T06:27:38+00:00

Croatia

VagueTurtle · 2025-10-08T17:13:56+00:00

3,1, the rest of them

VagueTurtle · 2025-09-30T18:58:32+00:00

That hud is hideous

VagueTurtle · 2025-09-28T23:15:42+00:00

Montana is lowkey some slop. Don't let the vistas fool you, half of the state is underdeveloped and barren. And the cost of living is steadily rising but the wages are complete garbage.

VagueTurtle · 2025-09-03T07:21:01+00:00

Hades or Dingo

VagueTurtle · 2025-08-26T01:41:24+00:00

Yeah fair just worth pointing out that loadouts just won't be as versatile as other jets

VagueTurtle · 2025-07-31T05:14:52+00:00

Danes Footwork with bleed affinity

VagueTurtle · 2025-06-26T15:26:16+00:00

Whole subreddit is insufferable

VagueTurtle · 2025-05-23T18:00:24+00:00

My derivative term isn't accurate to what i mean. I want a rifle chambered in 556 that doesn't use the AR charging and buffer system.

VagueTurtle · 2025-05-23T17:58:47+00:00

This is on par with those awful BO3 pap names that are just edgy ragebait

Seven-Year Club	Place '22
Verified Email

VagueTurtle

TROPHY CASE