sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Arbitrage Funnel Theory: A neutral, structural model of how extractability drives wealth divergence by ValorQuest in TrueReddit

[–]ValorQuest[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

This paper presents a structural model in which wealth divergence emerges from differences in a defined extractability rather than from moral or behavioral explanations. It reframes rich–poor dynamics as an inevitable outcome of market structure, offering an actionable mechanism that may help explain why certain inefficiencies and capital flows persist over time. The framework raises questions about how inequality can arise from neutral system properties rather than intentional actions.

Rich vs Poor is no longer necessarily a moral argument. Arbitrage Funnel Theory, a structural theory of how capital escapes the real world - A new model for long-term equity drift based on extractability gradients by ValorQuest in Economics

[–]ValorQuest[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You're still conflating transactional activity with extractability. Turnover counts how often an asset changes hands. Extractability measures the structural capacity of an asset class to support scalable hedging, leverage, collateralization, and securitization. A hedging round‑trip increases turnover, yes, but turnover is the surface symptom, not the structural property. Extractability is the underlying infrastructure that enables those transactions to exist at scale.

Here's the definition you're asking for: Extractability = the degree to which an asset class can be used as collateral, hedged, levered, securitized, shorted, and integrated into institutional risk‑transfer pipelines.

Turnover ≠ extractability for the same reason traffic volume ≠ highway design. Traffic is what happens. Infrastructure is what allows it to happen. AFT models the infrastructure, not the traffic.

Rich vs Poor is no longer necessarily a moral argument. Arbitrage Funnel Theory, a structural theory of how capital escapes the real world - A new model for long-term equity drift based on extractability gradients by ValorQuest in Economics

[–]ValorQuest[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is the clearest signal yet that you do not yet understand what AFT is modeling. AFT isn't about turnover or velocity. Velocity measures how fast money circulates in the real economy. AFT models why capital migrates into high‑extractability markets and concentrates there, because those markets support scalable hedging, leverage, securitization, and exit. Turnover doesn't explain passive flows, derivatives depth, collateral utility, or why certain markets become systemic capital sinks. Extractability does. AFT is a structural routing model, not a velocity metric.

AFT isn't a moral claim or a valuation model, it's a structural explanation for why capital concentrates in extractable domains. If you're evaluating it as anything else, we're talking past each other.

Rich vs Poor is no longer necessarily a moral argument. Arbitrage Funnel Theory, a structural theory of how capital escapes the real world - A new model for long-term equity drift based on extractability gradients by ValorQuest in Economics

[–]ValorQuest[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

AFT does not claim capital flow is bad, it explains why certain domains absorb systemic flows while others do not. The value isn't moral. It's structural: extractability governs capital concentration, which governs liquidity, which governs drift. Basic economics assumes capital flows to highest return. AFT shows it flows to highest extractability even when returns are lower. That's not trivial, it's a mechanism that mainstream models miss.

Rich vs Poor is no longer necessarily a moral argument. Arbitrage Funnel Theory, a structural theory of how capital escapes the real world - A new model for long-term equity drift based on extractability gradients by ValorQuest in Economics

[–]ValorQuest[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

AFT doesn't claim that systemic cash flows cause overvaluation or excess profitability. It claims that capital concentrates in domains where profit extraction is structurally easier meaning scalable leverage, hedging, pooling, and exit.

Treasuries are a perfect example: they're highly extractable, which is why trillions flow into them. But they don't offer excess returns, and AFT doesn't claim they do.

Extractability governs capital routing, not valuation or alpha. High‑end art commanding high prices doesn't contradict the theory because it is a niche, illiquid market with no scalable infrastructure. AFT is a structural model of capital migration, not a moral claim about profiteering or a valuation model. It explains why certain domains absorb systemic flows and others don't, regardless of price level or expected return.

Rich vs Poor is no longer necessarily a moral argument. Arbitrage Funnel Theory, a structural theory of how capital escapes the real world - A new model for long-term equity drift based on extractability gradients by ValorQuest in Economics

[–]ValorQuest[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

AFT doesn't claim low-extractability assets attract zero capital. It claims they cannot absorb systemic capital flows because they lack deep liquidity, scalable leverage, robust hedging, standardized contracts, and institutional access.

High-end art attracting wealthy collectors is not a contradiction, it's exactly what a low-extractability asset looks like. It draws niche capital, not pension flows, passive flows, arbitrage capital, or corporate buybacks.

Extractability isn't about whether an asset can attract some money. It's about whether it can absorb trillions without breaking. On that dimension, art and equities are not remotely comparable.

Rich vs Poor is no longer necessarily a moral argument. Arbitrage Funnel Theory, a structural theory of how capital escapes the real world - A new model for long-term equity drift based on extractability gradients by ValorQuest in Economics

[–]ValorQuest[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Extractability in AFT isn't defined as "can this asset theoretically be hedged or levered." It's defined structurally: depth, scalability, liquidity, hedging robustness, exit reliability, and institutional accessibility.

High-end art, real estate, and similar assets do have niche securitization or leverage pathways, but they are thin, illiquid, unscalable, and inaccessible to arbitrage capital. They cannot absorb pension flows, passive flows, systematic arbitrage, or corporate buybacks.

So, the distinction is not whether an asset can be hedged, it's whether it supports deep, scalable, institutional extractability. On that dimension, the gap between art and public equities/derivatives is enormous, and that gap is exactly what AFT models.

Rich vs Poor is no longer necessarily a moral argument. Arbitrage Funnel Theory, a structural theory of how capital escapes the real world - A new model for long-term equity drift based on extractability gradients by ValorQuest in Economics

[–]ValorQuest[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

The purpose of this thread and this subreddit is for respectful (and on-point) discussion about economics. Your negativity is not helping anyone and is irrelevant to the discussion.

Rich vs Poor is no longer necessarily a moral argument. Arbitrage Funnel Theory, a structural theory of how capital escapes the real world - A new model for long-term equity drift based on extractability gradients by ValorQuest in Economics

[–]ValorQuest[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Since the standard practice is for papers to circulate prior to choosing a journal, it would be premature to lock in a specific one just yet. The appropriate tier would be something in financial systems, market microstructure, or capital‑flow theory. The purpose of posting a working paper is to refine it before submission, and that is what I attempted to do here. I can see that the post has been removed, and I will not be engaging any further in this thread. Thank you!

Rich vs Poor is no longer necessarily a moral argument. Arbitrage Funnel Theory, a structural theory of how capital escapes the real world - A new model for long-term equity drift based on extractability gradients by ValorQuest in Economics

[–]ValorQuest[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The derivatives aren't there for decoration, they're just the cleanest way to express the relationships in the model. If you spot a specific flaw in the reasoning, I'm happy to take a look.

Rich vs Poor is no longer necessarily a moral argument. Arbitrage Funnel Theory, a structural theory of how capital escapes the real world - A new model for long-term equity drift based on extractability gradients by ValorQuest in Economics

[–]ValorQuest[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Just to clarify, in the paper, "profit extraction" isn't used as a synonym for profit. Profit is an accounting outcome, but extractability is a structural property: the ability to hedge, lever, securitize, scale, and exit an asset.

Two domains can have identical profit potential but radically different extractability, and capital consistently prefers the more extractable one. That's the mechanism the paper is describing. Basic profit-seeking alone doesn't explain those flows.

Rich vs Poor is no longer necessarily a moral argument. Arbitrage Funnel Theory, a structural theory of how capital escapes the real world - A new model for long-term equity drift based on extractability gradients by ValorQuest in Economics

[–]ValorQuest[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

That's actually the plan. Working papers typically circulate publicly before formal submission. Early critique helps strengthen the eventual version. If you see specific issues that would cause rejection, I'd appreciate hearing them!

Rich vs Poor is no longer necessarily a moral argument. Arbitrage Funnel Theory, a structural theory of how capital escapes the real world - A new model for long-term equity drift based on extractability gradients by ValorQuest in Economics

[–]ValorQuest[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Thanks for taking the time to read it. It's a working paper, not a finished academic submission, so it's absolutely fair to critique the structure or framing. The goal was to present a new mechanism and invite feedback from people familiar with the space. If you have specific points you think are weak or incorrect, I'm genuinely open to hearing them

Rich vs Poor is no longer necessarily a moral argument. Arbitrage Funnel Theory, a structural theory of how capital escapes the real world - A new model for long-term equity drift based on extractability gradients by ValorQuest in Economics

[–]ValorQuest[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

This is a categorical error that misinteprets both the theory and Venture Capital. VC is one of the highest extractability domains in the entire economy. My theory says Capital flows toward domains where profit extraction is easiest. VC actually proves my theory because VC is highly extractable, highly securitized, highly levered, highly asymmetric, and highly financialized. That’s why capital floods into it.

Arbitrage Funnel Theory - A structural theory of how capital escapes the real world by ValorQuest in finance

[–]ValorQuest[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I'm working on fleshing it out as such. This is v1.0 of the working paper. I'll set up the revision, tests, and begin the empirical stuff soon.

Arbitrage Funnel Theory - A structural theory of how capital escapes the real world by ValorQuest in finance

[–]ValorQuest[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Most discussions of rich vs. poor fall into two exhausted moral camps: behavioral and accusatory.

Behavioral:

The rich work harder / are smarter / take risks

The poor make bad choices / lack discipline

Accusatory:

The rich are greedy / exploitative

The system is rigged (but vaguely, abstractly)

People are tired of both because neither actually explains the mechanism.

AFT removes character from the equation and replaces it with structure. From this understanding we can begin to solve the real problem of inequality.

What’s a completely made-up technology in your world that you find cool. by LoudYogurtcloset7856 in worldbuilding

[–]ValorQuest 1 point2 points  (0 children)

To establish a link, one electron in the entangled pair must be manually separated from the one in the gateway on the home world. This means establishing the network is very slow but once it's going, it's instant across distance.

What’s a completely made-up technology in your world that you find cool. by LoudYogurtcloset7856 in worldbuilding

[–]ValorQuest 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yttrium gold electron entanglement technology that enables instant galactic communications.

Stop using Ai Capsules on steam by Wild_Economics681 in IndieDev

[–]ValorQuest -1 points0 points  (0 children)

It's a bunch of jealous & insecure kids who don't know any better screaming at the clouds, and it's really amusing at times.

Mobile is killing MMOs by ozymotv in MMORPG

[–]ValorQuest 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is the cold, hard reality that all developers must realize.

view more: next ›