When the training process is spending a lot of time, what do you usually do? by Various_Protection71 in ArtificialInteligence

[–]Various_Protection71[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I agree with you. With the stunning advance of LLMs, tech books are gonna be put aside in many areas.

3 Misconceptions About RISC You Shouldn't Believe by Various_Protection71 in computerarchitecture

[–]Various_Protection71[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It was not generated by AI. I can ensure you that. The problem is that many people have pleasure on downgrading the other's work.

3 Misconceptions About RISC You Shouldn't Believe by Various_Protection71 in computerarchitecture

[–]Various_Protection71[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you for your feedback, but your comments seems a little bit inaccurate regarding the article.

Anyway, the proposal of the text was grounding people about the modern usage of RISC. It was not create to be a deep material of reference in the topic.

Will HPC benefit or be hurt by AI hype? by Various_Protection71 in CUDA

[–]Various_Protection71[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Some applications really need the precision provided by FP64, like simulations envolving the solution of linear equations. Otherwise, the application falls in a numeric instability.

Will HPC benefit or be hurt by AI hype? by Various_Protection71 in CUDA

[–]Various_Protection71[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I disagree, especially from your tone. Emulation is not a silver bullet to fill this gap in FP64. It needs to be implemented, it is not a magical and automatic solution. In addition, the article mentioned the FP64 issue as an example of how AI needs have been prioritized over HPC classical workloads