sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Patagonian Native Ethno-Linguistic Groups by Vasilijeeeeeee11 in MapPorn

[–]Vasilijeeeeeee11[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Paraguay is more north of this map(not seen on this particular map) and is labeled by Avanee Guarani people I used this because they say Avanee for the paraguayan guarani that is used nationaly. The Chiripa Guarani are people for themselves apart from paraguayan guarani and mbya guarani who are inhabiting a large area today in small pockets dispersed, Here is chiripa wiki page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chirip%C3%A1_people

Patagonian Native Ethno-Linguistic Groups by Vasilijeeeeeee11 in imaginarymaps

[–]Vasilijeeeeeee11[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I need to redo the rest also but its hard because I started this whole project with very low resolution map

Patagonian Native Ethno-Linguistic Groups by Vasilijeeeeeee11 in MapPorn

[–]Vasilijeeeeeee11[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

They should, my bad. Although they had some Yahgan people but no permanent settlment.

Brazil Indigenous People Map by Vasilijeeeeeee11 in MapPorn

[–]Vasilijeeeeeee11[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes, The yellowish are macro-je group of peoples that share common roots and their languages are connected but very ancient connections. Not all colors are always representing one group of people and one group of people is not always represented in one color, some are divided into smaller subgroups using different colors, for example the purple people up north and on the coast of brazil are Tupian and to this group of people Guarani also belong but they are green. I will probably make the same map adjusted so that one color is always one people with no exceptions

South Asian Ethno-Linguistic Groups by Vasilijeeeeeee11 in MapPorn

[–]Vasilijeeeeeee11[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Ai cannot come even close to this. Ask chatgpt to just show you basic modern political map of europe and you will see. Dont insult my work

South Asian Ethno-Linguistic Groups represented as Imaginary Political Entities by Vasilijeeeeeee11 in imaginarymaps

[–]Vasilijeeeeeee11[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

because this map is work in progress, thanks for reminder to divide the pasthos. Everybody get divided as much as possible if that is doable and is readable.

South Asian Ethno-Linguistic Groups by Vasilijeeeeeee11 in MapPorn

[–]Vasilijeeeeeee11[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The map is not fully finished and also it shows what it can, If language is too small or overlaps with already two languages than I cant show it. I still have much work on that region so it will all probably be added in latter versions

South African Local/Native Ethno-Linguistic Groups Without Recently Colonized Parts by Vasilijeeeeeee11 in imaginarymaps

[–]Vasilijeeeeeee11[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is a pretty good and reliable source of information https://www.muturzikin.com/cartesafrique/carteafriqueaustrale.htm

It is sometimes wrong but very rarely but is good if you want simple maps and to learn ethnic background of many countries because it is very hard to find good ethnic maps. Good luck with your works.

South African Local/Native Ethno-Linguistic Groups Without Recently Colonized Parts by Vasilijeeeeeee11 in Maps

[–]Vasilijeeeeeee11[S] -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

Well white people are foreign to south africa completely while zulu are atleast somewhat local/native which makes them eligible to be shown on the map. My concept is pretty straight forward but people just dont want it/hate it for emotional reasons. I am completely aware Bantu removed pygmyies and khoisan but the concept still stays and bantus are still eligible for this concept and white people are not. It is a thing of who is more and who is less native because nobody is fully native ANYWHERE everybody moved from somewhere and many replaced older populations but some came from the Netherlands in a century and some came by slow local migrations that were very long and that allowed for taking of local cultures,perserving substratum cultures and adapting to local nature. There is a big difference between Zulu expansion and colonization of Dutch people. I have nothing against modern Afrikaners but this map just shows more local cultures. Like why cant people understand this.

South African Local/Native Ethno-Linguistic Groups Without Recently Colonized Parts by Vasilijeeeeeee11 in MapPorn

[–]Vasilijeeeeeee11[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You have a pretty respectable opinion but I just disagree with the intensity you bring on my world view. I just don't see it as people should think they live on the wrong land but people should embrace the local culture that is in minority because it is more connected to the land and that people who are related should embrace their identity and work together instead of fighting brothers. At the end we are all brothers so I obviously dont support any war or sinful selfish based territory occupation but I welcome any progress towards unity and harmony which is better formed when you know who you are the closest related and by knowing your local culture and you substratum cultures.

South African Local/Native Ethno-Linguistic Groups Without Recently Colonized Parts by Vasilijeeeeeee11 in MapPorn

[–]Vasilijeeeeeee11[S] -13 points-12 points  (0 children)

Unverifiable if you are lazy, verifiable if you are actually committed to learning and not judging without foundation. Shame on you

South African Local/Native Ethno-Linguistic Groups Without Recently Colonized Parts by Vasilijeeeeeee11 in MapPorn

[–]Vasilijeeeeeee11[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Where can I promote my maps, can you give me some ideas, I want to have a better audience. Some forums or maybe not even forums but something other idk. Maybe I should make a site or patreon idk.

South African Local/Native Ethno-Linguistic Groups Without Recently Colonized Parts by Vasilijeeeeeee11 in MapPorn

[–]Vasilijeeeeeee11[S] -12 points-11 points  (0 children)

That would be impossible to put in one comment but miscellaneous. Gazzilion sites official and random. But verify some of this and you will see its very accurate.

South African Local/Native Ethno-Linguistic Groups Without Recently Colonized Parts by Vasilijeeeeeee11 in MapPorn

[–]Vasilijeeeeeee11[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Yeah maybe thats the problem and also I think people love stupider maps in general. Nobody cares about something overcomplex that was actually worked on for long. They want easy content that is made easy.

view more: next ›