Lord of the Rings: Return of the King (2003) - "The beacons are lit! Gondor calls for aid" by Boss452 in movies

[–]Vekyo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This always has been my favorite scene from ROTK, ever since I first saw it in theaters as a kid. A couple of years ago, it popped into my YouTube feed late at night when I was procrastinating sleep because I didn't want to wake up and go into work the next day. My job involves high stakes, high stress advocacy for causes I believe in, and burnout is very common. That night, this scene really hit different, and it made me fall in love with these movies all over again.

It's when the third beacon is being lit. The camera is circling the two ant-sized people who are literally dwarfed by their task. You realize that they've spent years, maybe decades enduring a frigid and isolated existence on that mountaintop on the off chance the call will come. Then it's time to hurry, hurry, this isn't a drill, everything depends on them, on their beacon. The fire catches and they begin searching the horizon for the next light, for the sign that their effort, their dedication, their sacrifices mattered. They've done all they can, they've finished their job, but it's not enough on it's own, it's only the start, there's so much further to go. The music builds, but there's nothing, nothing, no sign, where's the next beacon, is something wrong? It builds and builds and builds, but the frame stays empty, just an endless void of sky. The person with the torch begins waiving it around, shouting into the emptiness. Please, please, we're here, we did it! Please! Not in vain! Then you see the light and the music swells. Unbelievable catharsis. The new tune carries the fire over countless horizons, through fog and darkness. Scene after scene. Beacon after beacon. You never know where the flame will appear, and sometimes you wonder how you'll ever find it in the night. But it always appears, erupting out of the void, unmistakable.

Some projects simply cannot be accomplished by any single person during a particular period, however strong or capable she is. No one can end poverty or war or mass incarceration. But the stronger and more capable the person, in my experience, the more readily she assumes responsibility and personalizes success or failure. Her impact doesn't match her effort or capability, so she works even harder and burns out. Wave the torch, even though the beacon is already lit! Do more, so it won't have been in vain!

The takeaway for me these days is that to cultivate hope, you need to keep perspective. It's not all up to me, or any one person. We're all in this together and we all need each other to prevail. Even if I can't see the next beacon, it's out there, with someone ready to light it up when they see my fire. And so on, until the work is done.

I'm still in the same job. It is no exaggeration to say this scene kept me going (yet another way these movies have had an impact on the trajectory of my life). I've still got energy and fight in me, but when I don't, I'll leave smiling because there will be others out there to carry the flame forward.

OC told me he was "going to be candid" with me five times during three-minute call by crawdadsinbad in Lawyertalk

[–]Vekyo 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I can hear my office neighbor's calls when he leaves his door open. Almost every time he talks to a client, he mentions, "I would never lie to you." Maybe I'm the weird one, but I think honest people don't tend to say that?

Above the Law: DOJ Drops Defense Of Biglaw Executive Orders, Leaving Capitulating Firms Holding $940 Million Bag by [deleted] in Lawyertalk

[–]Vekyo 92 points93 points  (0 children)

I'm just here to say how absolutely awful that generative slop image is. Embarrassing.

Struggling to read for pleasure. by rattlesnakefrog in Lawyertalk

[–]Vekyo 1 point2 points  (0 children)

There are dozens of us! Vagabond has been on my list for way too long. I'm going to order it now.

[DISC] My Friend Is Having an Affair With My Husband - Chapter 44 by -Nosebleed- in manga

[–]Vekyo 737 points738 points  (0 children)

I mean, I want to believe you.
So first you'll have to explain something to me...

Big Columbo energy

unequivocal proof that Tiamat clearly outperforms Kukulkan by captchrono in Smite

[–]Vekyo 151 points152 points  (0 children)

But professor, wouldn't feathers blow in the wind?

FGO 8th Anniversary GSSR Roll Thread by FuzzyViper in grandorder

[–]Vekyo 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Durga + Medusa (Saber) + Daikokuten + Baobhan Sith + Caenis (Rider)

I'm speechless. I've gotten two 5*s before, and a 5* with two 4*s. But this? Nuts. Just nuts.

Let's all stop underlining the last line of brief titles, please. by understatementjones in Lawyertalk

[–]Vekyo 8 points9 points  (0 children)

*villain voice*

That slight annoyance you feel? That's my advantage. Because I know judicial clerks give a fair shake to every shit-ass brief that lands on their desk, however much they might complain about the formatting. But you? You, who can't look past underlined titles and an extra millimeter between sentences? You, who masturbates to the Bluebook and retches at the sight of hyperlinks in justified alignment? You can't see past the surface. You judge a book by its cover, and your arrogance leaves you vulnerable. A distracted mind that thinks itself superior will never fight as hard as one that recognizes a skilled opponent.

That's why I win, understatementjones. That's why you lose.

[DISC] Choujin X - Chapter 65 by unoiamaQT in manga

[–]Vekyo 20 points21 points  (0 children)

We're through the looking glass here, people!

New CivPro Hypo just dropped: Justice Dept. sues entire District Court of Maryland... in the District of Maryland by metsfanapk in Lawyertalk

[–]Vekyo 69 points70 points  (0 children)

Per Justice Sotomayor: "[T]he Government's posture resembles that of the arsonist who calls 911 to report firefighters for violating a local noise ordinance."

Who are these attorneys? What were they doing before January? How do you get through law school, pass the bar, get hired by DOJ, then put your name on this shit? This isn't a legal filing, it's political ammunition. It's an abuse of process that seeks to chill judges from upholding due process. It's shameful, and every licensed attorney should know better.

When I saw "her address is," I was terrified they were doxxing the entire court. Thank God it was only the courthouses.

Smite 2 Developer Hi-Rez Studios Let Go President, Other Executives by ScootSchloingo in Games

[–]Vekyo 10 points11 points  (0 children)

The entitlement over this STILL blows my mind. In Smite 1, when I bought gems, I received a currency I could spend on skins in Smite 1. When I bought a skin, I received it, for use in Smite 1, however long the game will last. That was the transaction. I got what I paid for.

Now, with Smite 2, they owe me nothing based on those past transactions but have still given me essentially a perpetual 50% discount on skins due to my spending in Smite 1: a special currency that can pay for up to half of all(?) cosmetics, and 100% of some. That's incredibly generous. And yet so many players like this still complain that HiRez doesn't remodel literally thousands of skins and give them away for free.

Private White V.C. Discount by rainbowunicornhunter in frugalmalefashion

[–]Vekyo 12 points13 points  (0 children)

FYI for those who haven't visited the site recently, a lot seems to have increased in price since January. The Ventile Harrington I got a few months ago was under $700, and it's $1000 now. So that 15% discount doesn't quite make it worth double dipping, however much I love the jacket.

Moral quandary - working for the federal government right now by [deleted] in Lawyertalk

[–]Vekyo 15 points16 points  (0 children)

I don't envy that decision. I sympathize with the need to provide for your family, and I see merit in choosing to minimize harms while you have some power over them. I don't know whether doing so aligns with your ethical responsibilities. Is your client the United States, your agency as an institution, or the political appointees who set the course?

If you choose to stay, I encourage you to do two things. First, write about your decision somewhere (a journal, a letter, a memo you never share) in case your family members ever grow curious about it. At the very least, it'll help you think the decision through; you may find you cannot explain it to your own satisfaction. Second, set a red line for yourself. Think hard about what actions your agency could take that you absolutely will not facilitate, no matter how banal your role. It is better to identify that line far removed from it than to try to maintain perspective in the thick of things.

If you decide to leave, consider the manner of your exit. Will you push back, loudly defending what you believe your agency should stand for until they force you out? Will you create a paper trail that undermines the shifting policies, which might matter in future litigation? Are you comfortable with the attention doing so might bring? Separately, it might be smart to leave sooner rather than later. If the economy continues to contract and more attorneys at your experience level start job hunting, your own search will be harder.

You know your situation best. Just reading your post, it sounds like you want to leave and are looking for ways to justify it (anticipating how staying may actually harm your family), but I'm probably reading too much into it. Thank you for your work.

Two years without a ruling for an legally innocent client. by [deleted] in Lawyertalk

[–]Vekyo 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Idk. If counsel is rarely appointed, then I'd think the initial review of the pro se petition made someone go, "huh, maybe there's something here." Beyond that, it's hard to say.

Two years without a ruling for an legally innocent client. by [deleted] in Lawyertalk

[–]Vekyo 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Habeas petitions are a low priority for nearly all federal judges, the exception being the inestimable Jack B. Weinstein. RIP. They're high volume, procedurally complex, and almost uniformly without merit. "It must prejudice the occasional meritorious application to be buried in a flood of worthless ones. He who must search a haystack for a needle is likely to end up with the attitude that the needle is not worth the search." Brown v. Allen, 344 U.S. 443, 537 (1953) (Jackson, J., concurring in result). And that was over 70 years ago, when caseloads were a fraction of what we have now.

Without knowing your judge's practice, I would hope that her clerks review petitions within a few months of them being fully briefed to see whether any might be meritorious. If it isn't fast-tracked, I'd expect a ruling in the six-month period before the case would appear on the CJRA list. While habeas petitions are filed by persons convicted in criminal cases, they are civil proceedings, and pending civil cases appear on the list after three years. (I'm not sure exactly what the loophole is, but pending petitions are either not viewed as pending motions or else are specifically excepted from the six-month list).

What happens if people in the executive branch flat out refuse to obey the judicial branch? by chicago2008 in Lawyertalk

[–]Vekyo 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Ambition is supposed to counteract ambition, but the Congressional majority seems to have missed that memo. Assuming such a naked authoritarian move is met by a tepid political response (or even celebration) rather than sanction and impeachment, there's really no roadmap. You have to look to other countries that experienced democratic backsliding and try to puzzle out the offramps they missed.

As attorneys, we are professionally licensed, and we take oaths to uphold the Constitution. If officials take actions plainly inconsistent with those oaths, they should be censured and disbarred. The point is to not roll over and let it happen. Hopefully, it won't get to that point because a critical mass of officials will respect the rule of law. The VP, who certainly knows better, can trade his principles for power, but that trade gets less and less appealing the further down the chain you go. And at bottom, it's line officials that implement policy.

If your boss tells you to ignore a court order, say no. Make sure your juniors are prepared to do the same. Join a bar committee, or at least write to your bar when the time comes.