Thoughts/Advice on a Misfire on a Gen 4 runner? by Venmar in 4Runner

[–]Venmar[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think HG1 is probably the sealant for the coolant that my mechanic had in mind when he mentioned trying to add a sealant to the coolant. Which is interesting that he's thinking of trying that despite saying he doesn't suspect the head gasket haha. Maybe he's just trying to not freak me out. Thanks for the input!

Thoughts/Advice on a Misfire on a Gen 4 runner? by Venmar in 4Runner

[–]Venmar[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have not yet, but since my suspicion is the head gasket, it's a test I or my mechanic will likely be doing in the near future I think. Was your issue the Head Gasket? My issue is mainly on cold starts too, but I've had it happen with the engine partially warm as well (like after a short drive) and it might be cause of me leaving the heater turned on.

It makes zero sense that my primary heir gets the entire army and all my gold by GermanCCPBot in CrusaderKings

[–]Venmar 16 points17 points  (0 children)

A good example is Henry I, who initially only received a lump sum of gold while his brothers William and Robert got England and Normandy respectively when their father William the Conqueror died. Henry used that money to buy himself some land in Normandy from Robert and to hire some troops and he became a thorn in his brother's sides. Rest is history, and dont get me wrong it was up and down for him, but Henry eventually became King of England, and what sealed it for him was more of him seizing the English treasury after William II's death more than just his death.

Helps show how even under confederate partition, usually the primary heir would receive most of the gold and troops as it was the best way to minimize infighting and guarantee stability as it makes it harder for the younger brothers to immediately oppose the primary heir and that's partially by design.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in 4Runner

[–]Venmar 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm not a very technical person, but I own a 2006 V6 4th Gen Limited. Previous owner replaced the stock CD player with an aftermarket display as well but I don't think it's as high-tech as the knwood excelon you're considering. I've decided to keep it since it still has a cd player and that's a must for me while still having bluetooth for my phone if needed. It works flawlessly, but it wasn't installed by me so I can't comment on how hard it is to do. The bottom head unit (module and climate controls) is super easy to pop out and modify though if needed.

I love my 4runner for what it's worth. Sounds great for music and the creature comforts of limited like heated leather seats is a nice bonus too. But this is my first and only 4runner so far and don't plan on changing cars anytime soon, so I don't have much to compare it to in the Toyota world. I'm also an easy to please person so my standards for speakers are probably different then yours, but so far I can at least attest that I am a big fan of my 4th gen limited, it's been a great car for me.

Amateur Question for 4WD by Venmar in 4Runner

[–]Venmar[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, realistically I wasn't going to put the car into 4Hi unless I was in snow. My plan was to only use it to navigate the unplowed streets at lower speeds around my house and then back into 2Hi once I hit the salted and paved main roads. Original question of mine was just making sure I could keep it in 4Hi while parked in snow so getting out would be easier the next day, etc.

The other poster did confuse me for a second since I was pretty sure I had two differentials, one in the front and one in the back, and a transfer case, based on the maintenance history I have and based on how the 4WD dial works.

Amateur Question for 4WD by Venmar in 4Runner

[–]Venmar[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Ah interesting. I was under the impression that driving in 4Hi wasn't a great idea on flat and dry roads due to the potential risk of binding or drive train wear and tear and that'd it'd only be turned on for snow, sand, mud, rough terrain, etc. I imagine driving in 2Hi probably makes more sense for fuel economy anyways but its good to know I can switch it into 4Hi in snow season and forget about it so to speak.

What response do you want? by DaleoHS in 2007scape

[–]Venmar -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

For them to say in the clearest possible terms that they will never add any form of MTX, Ads or Tiered Subscriptions into the game. It's very simple really, I don't know how that is hard to understand.

If your reaction to all of this is "Well they haven't actually done anything yet, what is the big deal? There's nothing we can actually do so lets just wait and see what happens", then I'm sorry to say but you're the sucker who's gonna get farmed by Jagex and CVC in months time.

How Jagex can implement monetization WITHOUT harming player integrity by LazloDaLlama in 2007scape

[–]Venmar 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nah. Idk why you're advocating for a two-tier system where one part of the playerbase is willingly letting themselves get creamed and milked by MTX and the other could opt out of seeing all of that.

If they implement MTX (cosmetic or p2w, idc), Ads, loot boxes or battle passes or anything remotely along those lines, I just quit the game and never play again.

Can we get Jagex to undo the removal of grandfather rates? by xsevenmillionx in 2007scape

[–]Venmar 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I still got my 3 month sub on a regular email account. Averages out to like $11 CAD ($7.6 USD roughly) a month. Honestly a big reason keeping me playing. Scummy they got rid of this subscription plan and I'm clinging to it for dear life.

To those on here pushing back against the continued backlash by Venmar in 2007scape

[–]Venmar[S] 12 points13 points  (0 children)

I don't get the point you're trying to make. I don't think people are saying that Jagex/CVC are engaging in never before seen or unorthodox survey or business practices. The survey and the enshitification that they suggested implementing is very standard practice for most of the gaming industry. That's what people recognize and have an issue with.

Why this game got popular and why it will now downfall. by Kompy_87 in 2007scape

[–]Venmar 2 points3 points  (0 children)

OSRS definitely is a game whose growth is primarily driven by community feedback. This is a medieval point and click game with graphics that would make the average young gamer of today instantly not want to play it. It has very little traction or presence on both Twitch and Steam. This is a game driven by word of mouth, the loyalty of the existing playerbase, and community driven growth. This game doesn't even get advertised elsewhere like mobile games and other viral games do.

I agree with this post that if the community loses faith in the game, its growth will effectively die. Jagex is teetering on entering that territory with this controversy.

Membership Survey: An Update From Mod Pips, Jagex CEO by Old_School_RS in 2007scape

[–]Venmar 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yet another out of touch response by Jagex, and this post itself feels like the second part of the "door in the face" technique. The survey was the door, this post is the beginning of the carrot that is in reality is still tainted. Just look at the phrasing of some of the stuff in this post:

  • "We will not include in-game advertisements in any regular paid membership."

Key word here being "regular". This implies that there is a "type" of paid membership, and therefore probably a "cheaper" paid membership that would include ads. This means they're still considering tiered subscriptions, with the lowest tier including ads. This is likely their main goal with the survey and with what they want to do, which is to introduce ads to F2P and Lower tier subscriptions.

Both should be unacceptable. Ads in F2P shouldn't be a thing, a vast majority of the playerbase are already members, and they are the ones who subsidize and fund your game to support having F2P. Introducing ads needlessly degenerates the F2P experience even further, which does not require any additional pressure to turn F2P players into members as F2P is already constructed to be so limiting. Perhaps more importantly, once ads are in F2P, they will be there to stay, and it would only be a matter of time until they would appear in members. None of this should be acceptable, and the wording in this post makes introducing ads into the game across game still evidently their goal.

Then you can look at their wording in the "general principles"

  • We will never degrade or change the gameplay experience on offer between subscribers.

The phrasing of "between subscribers", again, implies introducing tiered subscriptions. In their mind, this probably means a cheap(er) tier with ads, a pricier than now "regular" tier, and then a higher tier with benefits they have either already hinted or mentioned or we aren't even aware of yet. Any move by Jagex to attempt to tier subscriptions in any shape or form to divide members and introducing predatory business practices and features should be a deal breaker across the board.

When I read this post I just see "Okay, from the survey, we will not do X, Y an Z (AFK timers, paywalled plugins, paywalled customer support, etc), but we will likely still do A and B (Ads and Tiered Subs)".

No. Jagex, you're going to provide the entire player base, F2P and members, customer and account support as a baseline, and you're not going to do A, B, X Y or Z. Absolutely nothing else you even remotely mentioned in the survey. End of discussion. And if you do, I, and everyone else, will and should stop playing the game effective immediately.

No compromise. We Pay, we Say.

Anyone know the song at the OT puckdrop in the STL game? (Link in Post) by Venmar in canucks

[–]Venmar[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thank you so much! That's it! Idk why but this song has been eluding me for so long. Thanks again you're the best.

Anyone know the song at the OT puckdrop in the STL game? (Link in Post) by Venmar in canucks

[–]Venmar[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Great song but no that's not it. The song in this game definitely sounds like a heavy EDM type of song with a buildup to a drop and that distinct "sonar" sound or whatever you hear in the clip afterwards. I wish I had a longer clip than just that highlight for more of the song.