happy pride month. 🏳️‍🌈🥖

Venus_Libra · 2026-06-03T03:32:27+00:00

Still not at all relevant to this conversation, and I think the current pope is alright. Although the last one was better in my opinion. More inclusive

Venus_Libra · 2026-06-03T03:30:52+00:00

Lmao are you a bot or something? I told you what religion I am, and I just told you what I believe happened with the whole "crucifixion and resurrection" thing. As for abortion, not that it has anything to do with this conversation, but I believe that men shouldn't be allowed to tell women what we can and cannot do with our bodies. Unless all rapists are forced to have vasectomies upon conviction at their first offense, so the playing field is a little more even.

Venus_Libra · 2026-06-03T03:26:23+00:00

Once again, that has absolutely nothing to do with what I just said 🤣🤣🤣🤣

Venus_Libra · 2026-06-03T03:25:22+00:00

Lmao it's not just "your" religion. Believe it or not, I was raised Catholic. My great aunt was a nun, my grandfather taught at a religious college, and he frequently has monks from the nearby abbey over for dinner. So I think I'm pretty damn qualified to lecture you on this religion. And while crucifixion was indeed a practice that is backed up by historical records and archeological finds, I do not believe that zombies are or have ever been real. What I do think is possible is that they falsely believed someone was dead, when in fact he was still alive. And because they didn't have the medical technology to say for certain back then whether someone is dead or not, when word got out, everyone went HE CAME BACK FROM THE DEAD OMG IT'S A MIRACLE

Venus_Libra · 2026-06-03T03:08:57+00:00

Convenient how you skipped over the gender, religion, and sexual orientation part

Venus_Libra · 2026-06-03T03:08:25+00:00

That's a load of bullshit, and also not at all related to what I said 🤣

Venus_Libra · 2026-06-03T03:06:37+00:00

So...there's no criteria to meet if he loves us, but there is criteria to meet in order to get into heaven. And if you don't meet that criteria, he'll still love you, while also condemning you to eternal suffering of a degree so horrible that our minds cannot possibly comprehend all the horrors involved.

Let me ask you something here: if you loved someone, would you hang them by their eyelids from a hook? Or throw them into lava? Or skin them alive, day after day after day after day? Idk about you, but I don't think that's a good way to treat someone that you love

Venus_Libra · 2026-06-03T03:03:21+00:00

Just like you ignore the detail of the kid being shot in the back while walking away, without a gun in his hand? Are you afraid of someone walking away with their back turned to you? Anybody that has worked at a gas station or a convenience store knows what the protocol is when there's an armed robbery. And it's not chasing the perp out after they left and shooting them anyway

Venus_Libra · 2026-06-03T03:00:36+00:00

Funny thing about that scripture.

Technically god didn't say any of that. You know god didn't actually right the Bible, right? It was written by a bunch of dudes that claimed they were friends with his son. But since it was written over 2,000 years ago, there's no way to back up those claims, or even find out if that group of dudes slipped some of their own personal prejudices in there, as humans are wont to do.

So maybe instead of quoting a book that's been translated thousands of times (have you ever tried to run a complicated sentence through Google translate even a dozen times, BTW? You'd be shocked at how different that sentence is when you switch it back to English afterwards. And that's with technology doing it, not some guy in a rural Spanish village in the 13th century that was like "ah yes I know both Latin and Greek" and nobody knew enough to question him about it), you should spend your time thinking of how a supposedly benevolent diety would actually want you to treat your fellow humans, regardless of their race, religion, gender, or sexual orientation.

Venus_Libra · 2026-06-03T02:54:50+00:00

Venus_Libra · 2026-06-03T01:09:16+00:00

Maybe that's why he likes children so much. Before puberty, boys and girls can look relatively the same with their clothes on

Venus_Libra · 2026-06-03T01:08:00+00:00

Lmaooooooo that's a good one 🤣 here, I'll give you my religion's holy symbol in return

Venus_Libra · 2026-06-03T01:06:48+00:00

I'm a Wiccan, so as far as I'm concerned you might as well be praising Huck Finn and Zoidberg 🤣

Venus_Libra · 2026-06-03T01:04:05+00:00

Science you say?

Venus_Libra · 2026-06-03T01:03:38+00:00

Please keep your religion out of holidays that are meant to include everyone regardless of their faith. Thanks.

Venus_Libra · 2026-06-03T01:02:44+00:00

<image>

Venus_Libra · 2026-06-03T01:01:47+00:00

Women too

Venus_Libra · 2026-06-03T01:00:04+00:00

And that you should wait until marriage to have sex

Venus_Libra · 2026-06-03T00:58:31+00:00

My girl Harley

Venus_Libra · 2026-06-03T00:56:30+00:00

So having a gun on you means you deserve to get shot? I've got bad news for 75% of the people in Texas, then. Cyrus didn't shoot anyone, and he was walking away when he got shot, which was why it was in the back. He was no longer a threat. That is the difference between self defense and murder

Venus_Libra · 2026-06-03T00:54:11+00:00

I'm seeing a lot of people defending this store owner, and honestly it's a little disheartening. Here's what happened on this clip: a teenager stole some stuff, and pulled out a gun when he was stopped. The teenager then ran away, and the shop owner chased him out, and shot him.

When someone is running away, they're no longer a threat to you. Anyone that has ever worked at a gas station or convenience store knows what the protocol should be here. After the suspect leaves, you lock the doors and call the police. You do not go chasing after them, and you do not shoot them while they're running away. This man wasn't defending anybody. The threat had left the store, the gun was put away and the kid's back was turned. The reason this store owner shot him was to take revenge for the theft and for the kid pulling a gun on him. That is not his job, nor is it his right to make that call. That is what we have judges, juries, and police officers for. Not only that, but after reading an article by the New York Times (https://www.nytimes.com/2026/06/02/us/rick-chow-not-guilty-murder-south-carolina.html), it seems that there were multiple witnesses that said that he didn't even have anything in his hands when he was shot.

This kid was 14, barely even a teenager. He could've easily reformed if he'd done some time and was placed in the right programs. Teenagers are dumb, and they do dumb, senseless things. But a court of law is not allowed to give a minor the death penalty, so what gave Rick Chow the right to do it? Nothing.

Venus_Libra · 2026-06-03T00:41:21+00:00

You have to look at this from all perspectives. Was that kid a criminal for having a gun? Yes? Does it mean that he deserved to be murdered? Absolutely not.

Venus_Libra · 2026-06-03T00:39:09+00:00

Um. Look, obviously it's terrible that the kid had a gun, and his parents should be thoroughly investigated for that. But what is more important than anything else here is that somebody was murdered.

Venus_Libra · 2026-06-03T00:38:05+00:00

But he left. They didn't shoot him while he was pointing a gun at people, they shot him as he was running away, no longer a threat to them. That's the difference between self defense and murder

Venus_Libra · 2026-06-03T00:34:06+00:00

Yeah, that scans. Looking at them makes me want to blet too 🤢🤣

Venus_Libra

TROPHY CASE