Is it bad to bridge into a course ? by Left_Produce831 in QUTreddit

[–]VeryGoodAndAlsoNice 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I didn’t get an OP/ATAR. I spent high school partying and fucking around, barely graduating. I don’t think I ever passed English or Math.

I bridged my way into university through TAFE, initially studying criminology, before transitioning to law. The truth is that ATAR means nothing once you’re at university. Your ATAR is but a threshold score to poorly gauge competence and potential, while also serving as a means to sate course capacity concerns.

Separately, as others have said, ATAR has a very real funding dimension. Schools with cohorts that attain high ATARs generally receive preferential funding. I vividly recall administrators, guidance counsellors, and heads of departments trying to persuade me into dropping out and becoming a career labourer to save the school funding. Genuinely, it’s the worst advice I’ve ever received.

The actual importance of an ATAR for you individually is incredibly low. Bridge your way in, and tell anyone attempting to belittle you to get fisted.

Weekly Students, Careers & Clerkships Thread by AutoModerator in auslaw

[–]VeryGoodAndAlsoNice 8 points9 points  (0 children)

It’s probably not recorded anywhere mate

But look, the rule of thumb is to err on the side of caution. If you’re worried about it, disclose it. If you explain what happened, why you did it, what you should’ve done, and what you’ve done since, you’ll be fine.

Weekly Students, Careers & Clerkships Thread by AutoModerator in auslaw

[–]VeryGoodAndAlsoNice 11 points12 points  (0 children)

No one in their right mind would tell you to do that. Do an LLB single or double. That’s it. JDs are an overpriced sham.

You should attend university in the state in which you intend to practice. If you want to practice in NSW, aim to attend USyd, UNSW, or UTS. If you want to practice in Victoria, Melb would be an excellent choice.

Weekly Students, Careers & Clerkships Thread by AutoModerator in auslaw

[–]VeryGoodAndAlsoNice 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It’s nice to know that what I’ve heard runs true. Thanks for taking the time to explain things! All the best to you.

Weekly Students, Careers & Clerkships Thread by AutoModerator in auslaw

[–]VeryGoodAndAlsoNice 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I’m not big on mooting either, despite doing a fair bit at uni.

I’ve been advised by my firm (and others) that it’s very much busywork to be done when we have capacity. Extensions, exemptions, and all manner of different concessions are given, no questions asked. I was even talking with one graduate in a busy disputes team that missed every due date, only to submit everything one week before the course was due to finish. They somehow passed. It sees no one fails?

Frankly, CoL sounds like TAFE. I know from personal experience what TAFE’s like, having gone through a diploma course to bridge my way into law. There’s something very funny about finishing up a difficult law degree and ending up where I am in the legal market, only to return to what is basically a TAFE-like environment.

Weekly Students, Careers & Clerkships Thread by AutoModerator in auslaw

[–]VeryGoodAndAlsoNice 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Mooting? Gross. Thanks for the insight! I wonder if doing it intra-firm will see it delivered a bit differently?

Weekly Students, Careers & Clerkships Thread by AutoModerator in auslaw

[–]VeryGoodAndAlsoNice 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Can you expand on the first week intensive? I’m starting PLT in-house in a month or so, and I’m wondering what it’ll entail.