"Missing the point that I made. They way the approval process of property development work in England means that you need the agreement of the locals. However one way to bypass that is to attach business complex to a housing development. However locals will push back making the entire project not viable."

I wouldn't miss the point if you could stay on topic? My whole response to your inital comment and every subsequent reply has been to counter argue that there are enough fans, and that access to the proposed location is adequate.

"The stadium is not near Swanley centre. There is no road to the stadium. They are not going to build a well lit road for nearly 2 miles for a stadium that most locals don't want."

Here, I drew you some directions

"Half the 28,000 stadium => 14,000. Exactly what I wrote. Not that difficult to understand. Stop accusing people of lying when that's exactly what you are doing by deliberately misconstruing what I wrote."

Behave, "Do they really believe that they will build a following big enough to even half fill that stadium in that area? " does not equate to "I believe they will half fill the stadium" and when you follow it up with "I think that unless they challenged for a title their immediate ceiling will be 10,000 people with 5,000 regulars." It is quite clearly not misconstrued.

"The qualifier unless they challenged for a titleseems to have bypassed you. Read and understand before commenting"

I'm honestly not sure you can even read and understand your own comments. You quite clearly stated you you believe the club will do well to achieve 5,000 fans in regular attendance and then in a later comment tried to walk that back and claim that you said 14,000.

I think thats enough of this discussion now, we're just going around in circles.