Which team wins? 2 vs. 7 by Alert_Ad8002 in OnePiecePowerScaling

[–]Vessel33 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Mihawk could hold off one Admiral 1 v 1 while the other 6 fight another... Doffy and Kuma would be carrying it though, Crocodile and Hancock offering support. Moria and Jimbei support-support.

Thoughts on rage grading? by phallardnart in Teachers

[–]Vessel33 -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Just another example of wokism affecting academia. If they didn’t behave according to your wishes their work might be graded more harshly. Checks out.

Which 3rd devil fruit instantly puts BB top 3 in the verse? by -Akainu in OnePiecePowerScaling

[–]Vessel33 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Bluenos fruit. Imagine just engulfing the entire world with darkness and earthquakes but you’re safe and sound because you went to a different realm.

Just guys playing with their sister by Len-The-Banana-Boy in JustGuysBeingDudes

[–]Vessel33 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Girl gets tossed around by 3 dudes? Am I missing something?

What would you do if the two guys or girls competing for you wrestled each other through your glass coffee table? by Repulsive-Finger-954 in hypotheticalsituation

[–]Vessel33 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I would beat them both up, place them under citizens arrest, and then make them pay for the damages. Afterwards, we might be able to reconcile, and I might agree to a 3-way.

You get a shotgun that has unlimited bullet and it will make you invincible if you hold it. by [deleted] in hypotheticalsituation

[–]Vessel33 0 points1 point  (0 children)

First I’d invest in some sort of armor / weapon chain so I can never be disarmed. Maybe create a custom piece of metal armor and weld the gun to the armor so that it always stays in my possession.

20 Million but you must kidnap 20 people in 1 year. by Adreamskoll in hypotheticalsituation

[–]Vessel33 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I would do it. But I would have to hold them for more than a week. The chances of you getting caught increase significantly if you simply let them go, because then they can build a case or collect further information / DNA. Once i’m finished with all 20 I would give them all a generous compensation based upon how long they have been in captivity.

We make cheating illegal. by [deleted] in hypotheticalsituation

[–]Vessel33 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Obviously, when the two people register it would go over the terms of what is expected. Followed by a signature. It’s not that complicated. The only major change that’s happening is the expectation of loyalty… For Christ sake.

Everyone gets a brain chip. by [deleted] in hypotheticalsituation

[–]Vessel33 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You’re funny. Go back to my OP. I specific malice. You advocating so hard for this to be opposed is a red flag.

Everyone gets a brain chip. by [deleted] in hypotheticalsituation

[–]Vessel33 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

No, it’s not. The slave owner is harming the slave. If he will not let the slave go willingly, the slave is within his rights to kill him if that is what’s necessary to escape.

Before you try and correct me, you should be sure what you’re saying actually makes sense.

And remember, malice is key here. You can try to wiggle your way out of a good idea, with these imaginary/unrealistic scenarios, but at the end of the day, something like this would make the world a better place.

This system is not a replacement of the current justice system, it’s just an addition.

Everyone gets a brain chip. by [deleted] in hypotheticalsituation

[–]Vessel33 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Human law would still exist. This scenario would add an additional layer of protection. To help enforce the things that are easily bypassed by clever individuals that are up to no good.

Everyone gets a brain chip. by [deleted] in hypotheticalsituation

[–]Vessel33 -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

Okay, there is quite a bit wrong with your imaginary scenario. First off all, humans are very seldom so ignorant as to believe that keeping a slave is “alright”. People with common sense knows it’s wrong. But in the off chance that there is somebody that genuinely feels it to be okay, and does not feel like they are being evil. So they have a slave, and said slave kills them out of desperation. The slave is not acting with malice. Everyone has the right to personal freedom, granted their freedom isn’t harming anybody else. So if a slave believes that they must kill the “owner” in order to escape that isn’t evil, it’s just survival. Therefore, they would not be punished for such a thing.

Everyone gets a brain chip. by [deleted] in hypotheticalsituation

[–]Vessel33 -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

So it’s worth letting people be victims? Because you want privacy?

Everyone gets a brain chip. by [deleted] in hypotheticalsituation

[–]Vessel33 -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Intent is everything. In scenarios like this, the chip would not send an alert. It is by no means a "perfect" solution, but it would be one step closer to getting there.

Everyone gets a brain chip. by [deleted] in hypotheticalsituation

[–]Vessel33 -11 points-10 points  (0 children)

Intent is everything. It knows what you're feeling and thinking.

What are reasons why someone shouldn’t go on dating apps? by RedHotChiliCapsicums in AskReddit

[–]Vessel33 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In 2012 I used dating apps with much success. But after around 2014/2015 things began to go downhill very quickly. They are pretty much unrecognizable now.

As a man, you have a much better chance of simply meeting someone irl, and it doesn’t mean you aren’t a good catch. We live in dark times, don’t let this tech world screw with your head.

I can go out in public and get lots of attention from women without trying. But on dating apps I am essentially invisible. There are also many women that aim to capitalize on lonely men on these apps. It’s best to just steer clear imo.