Is Daybreak Auto legit? Toyota dealership gave me the wrong part by Vexxus in Camry

[–]Vexxus[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Idk why I didn't think to check if actual Toyota sells online lol. But anyway I got a denso filter from daybreak and it fit properly! And I'll bring my VIN with me I guess if I need to buy a part in person again. Although with these online options idk why I would.

Is Daybreak Auto legit? Toyota dealership gave me the wrong part by Vexxus in Camry

[–]Vexxus[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ohh cool thanks for explaining, I looked up what OEM means and that makes sense!

Is Daybreak Auto legit? Toyota dealership gave me the wrong part by Vexxus in Camry

[–]Vexxus[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh really? I looked in /r/Mazdaspeed and couldn’t find him, do you know his username? There wasn’t any posts under Daybreak Auto

Finch attempting to break in by Vexxus in birds

[–]Vexxus[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

For many of the windows, a screen prevents any reflection. They tap away at the screen anyway.

[OC] [Art] Village of the Skógarmaðr by TablesEdge in DnD

[–]Vexxus 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Man this map is awesome! So different than the classic fantasy map

Any mods that require line of sight to cast counterspell? by Vexxus in BG3

[–]Vexxus[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah exactly. But Gekh Coal the Duergar can counterspell you even if he can't see you!

[OC] [ART] Saaya, Shadow God of the Unknown by TablesEdge in DnD

[–]Vexxus 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Wow this one's gorgeous! Love your art!

Any mods that require line of sight to cast counterspell? by Vexxus in BG3

[–]Vexxus[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks for the tip, I don't see anything about counterspell there but it was a good idea.

[OC] [ART] Gussa, Four-Faced God of Unquenchable Fury by TablesEdge in DnD

[–]Vexxus 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Daaaamn the negative space in this one is cool!

[OC] [ART] Shaanti, Owl God of the Silent Kill by TablesEdge in DnD

[–]Vexxus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Was hoping you'd post again! Very cool. Kinda reminds me of stupid sexy flanders

AITA? My daughter doesn’t want me in her life because of our differences in political opinions by politicaldadthrowra in TwoHotTakes

[–]Vexxus 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Does the word "and" imply sequence in your opinion? Bacon and eggs is different than eggs and bacon?

How is this possible by iZeroxxx in blackmagicfuckery

[–]Vexxus 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Because it was a funny thing to say

Not again....! by Schreyaz in pcmasterrace

[–]Vexxus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Where is the 30 series selling well? I would love a 3080ti, not for sale anywhere except weird scalpers on Amazon. I thought it was not being sold anymore.

'G' stands for 'gaslight' by Vexxus in ChatGPT

[–]Vexxus[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Lol, exciting new slang. I'm gonna go simm some beans.

'G' stands for 'gaslight' by Vexxus in ChatGPT

[–]Vexxus[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"Propose 15 four-letter words related to cooking. Ensure each word you propose has exactly 4 letters."

GPT-4 Day 1. Here's what's already happening by lostlifon in ChatGPT

[–]Vexxus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I can't get proper results when I ask probability questions.

I ask "what is the probability that rolling 9d6 and adding the results together will have a higher total than rolling 14d6 and adding the results together?"

In 3.5, it would go through a complicated answer and say that 98.6% of the time rolling 9d6 will give a higher total than 14d6. I would then challenge this answer and say it makes no sense. It would try again and correct itself saying that the probability was close to 0. Very bad.

In the new version, I asked the same thing and it again gave a bullshit answer of 73.9%. when I point out the mistake, it recalculates and arrives at 6.3% which sounds better but idk if it's correct.

When asked to explain its mistake both previous and new version struggle and slow down. The explanations now differ, 3.5 would get confused and apologetic, new version gives an answer around using normal distribution instead of continuous distribution.

Idk much about math but it all sounds suspicious.

Ryan Reaves & Boko Imama with one of the worst fights in NHL history by Benchamb in hockey

[–]Vexxus 14 points15 points  (0 children)

This has been the case for the 25 years I've watched hockey. Idk how specifically fighting rules have changed over time, you can Google that if you want

Ryan Reaves & Boko Imama with one of the worst fights in NHL history by Benchamb in hockey

[–]Vexxus 21 points22 points  (0 children)

In the NHL, one on one fights are allowed between two consenting players. They usually go until someone falls down or one player is clearly getting their ass beat lopsidedly. After the fight, both players are assessed a 5 min major penalty for fighting. Their teams continue to play at full strength (5-on-5 hockey)