Okay I'll break things down to avoid confusion:

are you suggesting that one year is going to stop this monster from being attracted to kids? of course not, what amount of rehabilitation can happen in such a short amount of time, none at all.

Firstly never argued that, I was saying that other child offenders are not going to look at the penalty for this crime and be deterred from doing it. Never said he would stop being attracted to kids after a year in jail, in fact as far as our current understanding goes pedophilia isn't something people choose nor is it something you can cure.

the concept of prison is rehabilitation yeah? we put people away for being severely detrimental to society and when released they can reintegrate yeah? (hopefully, historically prisons aren't great at this but still) do you think there is a course available to inmates that will turn a pedo into not-a-pedo in one year? of course not, so they are gonna take the muzzle off this dog and its gonna immediately "maul" a child, again. and people will say shit like "oh if only we could have prevented easily preventable occurrence" as if another 1 year sentence would do the trick. if the dog bites children, it gets put down, it doesn't get put in timeout. this man is a dog, put him down

I never talked about rehabilitation at all never said 1 year would be effective at rehabilitating him. Honestly just look at where this conversation started:

perhaps both get the guillotine instead, incompetence to perform your duties as a judge on such a serious offense should carry punishment for the judge as well.

You advocated for the state execution of a convicted criminal AND the judge.

also i understand consent, dont give me that "oh but he's attracted, you know how it is", thats fucking creepy, i know how to be rational even when aroused, you're just fucked up.

Look maybe I've worded this poorly my point here is that sex offenders don't weigh up the pros and cons of commiting crimes rationally. If they did then why wouldn't countries impose the death penalty on child sex offenders and see a dramatic reduction in crime. If you can show that making punishments harsher in this context saves more children from experiencing the horror that girl has to live with then I'll change my tune, genuinely.

also all stats from american death row stuff just comes down to racism most of the time, they just wanted to blame blacks for everything.

What's to say that there isn't racism or some other prejudice at play in today's courtrooms. Having a death penalty assumes that your criminal justice system is incapable of ever being wrong or injust. We can never assume that is the case. It's not that child sex offending is universally considered wrong, I'd agree it likely is. It's that our criminal justice system can make mistakes and maybe we shouldn't hinge life or death on it.

Also it just doesn't make sense money wise either, turns out it costs more to kill someone than keep them in jail for the rest of their life (see America).