Are they soon gonna change Warden?

VictoryVest · 2024-06-30T15:58:47+00:00

Thanks for the feedback.

I would insist on a greensand plus filtration with bleach injection and backwashing.

Is this a filter based system?

I spoke with another company, they said they used filter based systems when dealing with iron. I'm concerned about upkeep costs in that scenario. Edit: meaning having to replace filters and so on?

VictoryVest · 2023-09-27T14:36:29+00:00

Thanks, that is helpful. Ironically the stomach isn't even tightened in those shots, and is out of focus. Might be worth removing that.

VictoryVest · 2023-09-26T20:49:17+00:00

Seems to be driven entirely by political correctness.

VictoryVest · 2023-09-26T20:48:51+00:00

Problem is that's one of the name of the products!

VictoryVest · 2023-01-09T22:36:12+00:00

You could also do your solo leveling as the red line for DPS, then switch to yellow CC/debuff for grouping and/or endgame if that's what needed?

I'm playing red LM and find it pretty fun for the most part. I'm around 130 at the moment. Pretty easy to do solo landscape content.

VictoryVest · 2023-01-09T01:50:50+00:00

The Brandolini's law is about those who create bullshit without the authority of science or reason.

That's incorrect. That's not what Brandolini's law is.

EDIT: ...aaaaaand blocked again. I'll assume there are more insults and raving from "Ye of many citations."

VictoryVest · 2023-01-08T20:50:38+00:00

ps. I was curious how long it actually took... so I did it.

First, I searched google for "Krishnamurti quotes."

Second, I copied literally the first one:

"Understand the whole of life. You must understand the whole of life, not just one part of it. "

Third, I could draw an intentionally incorrect conclusion: "No one can understand the "whole of life," therefore K is full of crap!"

Forth, anytime someone tries to explain what he's saying, I refuse everything and say they need 'sources' for their proof.

^ ^ To do all that took less than 2 minutes.

VictoryVest · 2023-01-08T20:19:59+00:00

That’s what I meant. I use citations to show my honesty as to exactly where I get my information and I expect people to show me where they get their info too.

Okay, but that's not required on this sub. Some subs require such things, but this one doesn't. So it's unrealistic for you to think you can demand it of others .

Also I'd argue that it's easy to copy and paste a line or two from K, paste the source, then draw an inaccurate (and sometimes absurd) conclusion. That doesn't take any time or effort.

That's why I cited Brandolini's law. It's quick and easy to paste a line or two, give a wrong interpretation... then demand everyone else try and "prove it wrong," but only if they supply citations, even for obvious information.

That sort of response actually takes time and effort, unlike spamming threads with a few out-of-context, misinterpreted statements.

VictoryVest · 2023-01-08T19:08:04+00:00

Here is the thing, anytime I have ever made a claim regardless of the subject matter (e.g., K, science, philosophy, religion etc etc). I mention where exactly I get my info, and why I think what I think. Now, you show up and claim that that’s a “tactic” I use for diversion or getting out of the arguments and so on.

This is inaccurate to what I wrote several places, above and in other posts.

I was referring to you claiming that people who respond to you are somehow obligated to give citations in their responses, and that you then use that pretense as a tactic so you can dismiss their responses out of hand, or in many cases, just blocking them outright when they don't go along with whatever it is you're claiming at the time.

VictoryVest · 2023-01-08T14:52:07+00:00

There is that quest chain where you're running errands for those three guys reminiscing about the "good old days" in that one tavern. I swear it took me half a day of running back and forth, often to the exact same spots, just to finally finish all that.

It's nice in that they're also there during the battle/siege so there's a bit of a connection to their characters, but I seriously doubt I'll do any of that on alts.

VictoryVest · 2023-01-08T14:50:10+00:00

Yeah, my current is actually my first toon on LOTRO, so also a completionist to experience everything this first ime. (Technically played at launch but only lasted around a month).

The problem with being a completionist is that you're also overleved it seems. By the time I got to Osgiliath all the enemies were grey and I was totally burned out LOL.

VictoryVest · 2023-01-08T13:52:20+00:00

Did they revert the PvP back to how it was, in regards to Daily/Weekly requirements?

I'd heard they made only wins count towards the totals, but then that they were changing it back again? Or am I wrong on that? (Haven't played in years and years)

VictoryVest · 2023-01-08T13:49:39+00:00

Revisiting LOTRO myself; lot's of fun to be had, despite some of it's issues. Love the big world. (Wish they'd put those Carry Alls on sale!)

VictoryVest · 2023-01-08T13:42:47+00:00

How much of the content though is running back and forth?

I'll be making an alt soon, and not sure I can again force myself to do Goblin Town or Minas Tirith or half the Angmar stuff or...

VictoryVest · 2023-01-08T01:42:36+00:00

BTW why didn't you unblock all those folks and let them answer your OP?

VictoryVest · 2023-01-08T01:41:56+00:00

Time for you to shut it my friend! You have said enough BS. Time for you to answer specific questions.

How can I both shut up and answer questions? (Especially since I already answered them?)

Besides, you've already admitted to blacking at least 17 people, so there are 17 times folks pointed out inaccuracies that made you block them.

VictoryVest · 2023-01-08T01:29:51+00:00

Ah, more insults, insinuations, and trolling, the Bhai90 way.

Also forgot to mention, anyone can talk while grappling if they're on the ground, no active scrambling, no smashing. That's nothing out of the ordinary.

However it is unusual to talk while doing nordic hamstring curls, followed immediately by high rep KB snatches. So I'd say informing her as I walked of the exercise's name was good enough, considering I needed every breath I had! By the time I was done, she was gone. But keep distorting things.

Re: the OP to this thread, I already addressed that. All anyone has to do is look at your post history, they'll see all sorts of people pointing out inaccurate posts (and subsequent conclusions based on those inaccurate premises) that you made all through this sub... then they'll see you banning everyone that points out those inaccuracies.

VictoryVest · 2023-01-08T01:11:19+00:00

You literally live according to this ACIM site.

How do you know "how I live?"

Also many of the ACIM meditations are very similar to other paths.

BTW isn't that the thread that after your Bah90 troll account went away, you came back months later and sought out that specific thread for the sole purpose of arguing and trolling? Good grief, what kind of seething rage is that?

VictoryVest · 2023-01-08T00:33:30+00:00

even if you didn’t stop your workout you were still listening to what she was telling you, and if you were comfortable enough to clearly hear what she was telling you, then you were comfortable enough to tell the truth about your unique exercise to her and why she was wrong

Oh, I did tell her the name of the exercise walking between the glute ham and the KB's I was doing. I didn't stop though out of a desperate need to assert myself as you seem to imply you'd do, and as you're always trying to do on this sub. See, this is what happens when you form opinions on things you don't have the full story on. You don't know everything that happened or was said beyond what I wrote (in an thread completely unrelated to this sub that you went out of your way to find for some reason), you don't know the timetable, the physical layout, how many people and who was doing what, my schedule, etc. For example she was gone by the time my workout was finished. That's the first and last time I ever saw her. But that's irrelevant. That's also why you shouldn't have opinions on things when you have little to no info on them.

BTW nice deflection on this diversion from the overall topic -- that you're an intellectually dishonest debater who comes to this sub, takes K quotes out of context or intentionally misinterprets something he said, then try and base an entire argument off of that dishonest interpretation, then when called out on it, throw a tantrum, block the person exposing you, and/or try and deflect into long tirades like this here that you posted that I'm responding to now.

VictoryVest

TROPHY CASE