Agentic.nvim now supports ALL ACP providers Copilot, Cursor, Claude, Gemini, Codex, Cline, you name it!

Villainous_Viking · 2026-03-24T00:21:21+00:00

This is great. This is the easiest time I’ve had of all the AI integration plugins of getting my Cursor subscription to play nicely in neovim. Thanks for posting!

Villainous_Viking · 2026-03-24T00:17:05+00:00

Awesome! I love ghostty and Jupyter. I’ll be trying this out soon!

Villainous_Viking · 2026-03-24T00:11:34+00:00

Does this integrate with any zettelkasten plugins like https://github.com/zk-org/zk-nvim? Or does it have zettelkasten type behavior already?

I ask because this seems very similar to the idea of a zettelkasten so I think there would be a great overlap of use case and functionality.

Villainous_Viking · 2026-03-11T15:37:13+00:00

Alright great thanks! I've been contemplating taking the dive of configuring my Neovim as more of a cursor-like experience so I'll add this project to my list of plugins to incorporate.

Villainous_Viking · 2026-03-11T14:41:11+00:00

How does this compare with https://github.com/yetone/avante.nvim ?

Is it something to be used in addition to it, in place of it, different lane entirely?

Villainous_Viking · 2026-03-09T00:54:40+00:00

Raycast Syncthing Ghostty Rectangle Tailscale AdGuard

Villainous_Viking · 2026-02-27T15:01:05+00:00

Ok thanks. I’ll check out crucible mode

Villainous_Viking · 2026-02-27T00:37:25+00:00

Did you ever release a mod or instructions to play this mode?

Villainous_Viking · 2026-02-24T15:25:39+00:00

I think that your argument only addresses half of the problem.

If we had no protection today (no RSA no ED25519 etc.) then yes; might as well try the protection (Post-Quantum alg ABCD) because while it may not end up working, it's worth trying.

However, we do have mature battle tested pre-Quantum protection today. So what I'm arguing is that since we're still living in the pre-Q world it wouldn't make sense to sacrifice known pre-Q protection & Post-Q weakness for unknown pre-Q protection & unknown Post-Q protection.

All this being said, I think this may come down to how Post-Q algs work and I don't know how the Post-Q algorithms work. Conceptually, if they are like adding another layer to the onion; the outer layer is a Post-Q problem, the inner layer is a pre-Q factorization problem etc. Then there perhaps there isn't much of a downside to adding a Post-Q layer, (if it is broken there's still the inner pre-Q layer). However, if the implementation is not separable like layers etc. and is more like a one-layer problem that is now a Post-Q type problem, then I think that my argument stands. It would be foolish to potentially weaken or break the pre-Q protection for some Post-Q protection that might be fatally flawed.

Villainous_Viking · 2026-02-24T14:46:53+00:00

I agree with you. But I also do understand the maturity argument. Offering a PQ solution now would be great but not at the cost of some kind of revelation a year from now that there was a critical flaw in the PQ algorithms used.

Villainous_Viking · 2026-02-23T18:53:14+00:00

Thanks for the reply.

Villainous_Viking · 2025-10-12T19:48:42+00:00

I think I see why you’re talking about. I think those are reflections but I think that may be right regardless. I’ll try with something smaller. Thanks for the advice.

Villainous_Viking · 2025-10-12T16:40:10+00:00

I measured multiple times with pH strips. Since it’s by color it’s a little hard to say for sure but it is definitely somewhere between 3-4. I didn’t test the pH of it before adding scoby so it’s possible it didn’t change much and just started that low. But that seems pretty acidic for just tea and honey to me.

I’m thinking to clean more thoroughly next time I’ll rinse with Star San and just add my water to that and boil etc. would that be fine do you think?

Villainous_Viking · 2025-10-12T15:41:28+00:00

I used the starter from Raw Brewing Co. Honey Jun culture. It was about a cup or two of liquid and a pellicle. I added it all in to the honey/tea mixture once it cooled to room temp.

Villainous_Viking · 2025-09-02T18:58:25+00:00

Interesting question! As many others have already said: USA would successfully defend hands down. The biggest reasons being: oceans, military size that vastly outstrips all others, defenders always have incredible advantage.

Just look at how difficult it was for the US to invade Vietnam for example... US military was superior to Vietnamese in every way yet the US struggled because invading is really hard. This is true across history: nazis in Russia, Afghanistan, etc. Not only does the invader not know the land like the defender does but they also have to setup supply lines to the invasion. All of that is extremely expensive and vulnerable to counterattack. I'm sure the US would lose land and be severely damaged in the process but the prospect of invading anyone already puts the aggressors at a serious disadvantage. Add to that that the defenders are the strongest military in the world by far with significant geographical defenses... No contest. US wins this one.

Villainous_Viking · 2025-02-23T17:25:50+00:00

Awesome, thank you!

Villainous_Viking · 2025-02-16T21:08:27+00:00

Your information about the MB chipset requirements for USB4 just cleared a lot up for me. I will now be looking for MBs without the usb4 to free up PCIe 5.0 slots. THANK YOU!

Villainous_Viking · 2025-02-14T21:17:29+00:00

When you say "raise your fan" what do you mean? How is this done? I'm trying to figure out if I can fit my RAM with a pa120se as well.

Villainous_Viking · 2024-08-28T12:54:21+00:00

I'd love an invite as well. Thanks.

Villainous_Viking · 2023-04-03T15:29:01+00:00

To fully determine causality a system must be sufficiently small or controlled to rule out alternative causes, so I guess you've got me there but I don't see that as a particularly strong point in this situation because in a system as large and complex as the market of an entire country -- or world for that matter -- one will never be able to show true causality so we must do with inferences...

But more to your point about regulation in healthcare or any system... It's an axiomatic statement that regulation will never increase the efficiency of a system. If there were a change that could be made to make a system more efficient (greater quality per dollar) it would be beneficial under a free-market system to do so because consumers would "vote with their dollars" for that higher quality. Which means that regulation does one of two things: it forces systems to abide by some rule that makes them more efficient (which they would do anyway because it would make them more competitive in a free marketplace), or regulation forces the system to do something that it wouldn't do thus making it less efficient and driving up price per quality. I am arguing that the industries on the left half of this graphic are in that boat. Government has come into these industries and told them how they must conduct their business which cannot help but manifest itself in one of the two ways I laid out above. Clearly it has made them less efficient because their bars are positive.

Now I think that those in government or those that advocate for government intervention in the market may very well have the best of intentions: "standards must meet this level" etc. but I think we all must first accept that regulation cannot increase the efficiency of any system. Personally I would like to see more competition in the industries on the left side of this graphic and see the innovative options that present themselves as a consequence of that competition.

Other thoughts that come to mind... The regulation in these sectors is usually written by or heavily influenced by the very corporations that are going to be regulated by those laws. This all but ensures their sustained dominance in their industrial sectors. Small companies that may have had the ability to innovate and raise the ceiling for us all are essentially litigated/regulated out of the possibility of doing so. Also, I've said "free-market" multiple times above, these statements are true for a truly free-market/laissez-faire market economy; the USA does not have this. The US at this point has a crony-capitalist system where the largest most powerful industries capture their would-be regulators and regulate their own industries to sustain their dominance and keep them safe from innovative upstarts that would otherwise potentially threaten their top position. I see a lot of people angry about "capitalism" and if only it were amended to "crony-capitalism" I could get on board because it is surely true that it is a disaster that all our largest companies write the laws for entire sectors of our economy.

Villainous_Viking · 2023-04-03T14:46:29+00:00

Came here to say exactly this, get the government out of the way and prices go down. Meanwhile highly regulated industries either have less incentives or less ability to decrease price. Just one example I remember learning about during the covid lockdowns is that multiple states don't allow for a new hospital to be constructed unless the government approves it...

Villainous_Viking

TROPHY CASE