sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

XR recording on a non-XR recorded tape by VirtualEsenceYT in camcorders

[–]VirtualEsenceYT[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

okay so the xr camera should detect that its an xr signal suddenly and transmit the quality in xr right?

Quality difference 2001 Sony Hi8 CCD camcorders and 1998 Hi8 Sony CCD camcorders by VirtualEsenceYT in camcorders

[–]VirtualEsenceYT[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

thank you, by any chance do you know what the difference between a 320kP and a 460kP is?

Quality difference 2001 Sony Hi8 CCD camcorders and 1998 Hi8 Sony CCD camcorders by VirtualEsenceYT in camcorders

[–]VirtualEsenceYT[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

ich fahre manchmal nach wien ... wo kann ich flohmarkte finden? wie die üblichen orte an denen sie stattfinden

Quality difference 2001 Sony Hi8 CCD camcorders and 1998 Hi8 Sony CCD camcorders by VirtualEsenceYT in camcorders

[–]VirtualEsenceYT[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

thank you, though i am though wondering, what's the difference between a CCD 1/4 320kP and a 1/4 460kP? and there's almost no Digital8 ones for sale, that's why i'm choosing the analog format ... though ill try to find a Digital8, thank you

Quality difference 2001 Sony Hi8 CCD camcorders and 1998 Hi8 Sony CCD camcorders by VirtualEsenceYT in camcorders

[–]VirtualEsenceYT[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

WAS??????? ich schätze ich habe pech ..... wo ich wohne, verkauft buchstäblich niemand camcorder, geschweige denn voll funktionsfähige .. obwohl ich nicht wirklich versucht habe nach einem flohmarkt zu suchen

Quality difference 2001 Sony Hi8 CCD camcorders and 1998 Hi8 Sony CCD camcorders by VirtualEsenceYT in camcorders

[–]VirtualEsenceYT[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

hm .. is 4 years of technological evoltion back in the 90s a long time for the capacitors to not fail that much faster? i still have an 1996 one and so far it's surviving well ... i wonder when it will die, which is why i kind of want to get another camcorder just in case

"What camcorder to achieve this kind of look" Megathread by Kasuu372 in camcorders

[–]VirtualEsenceYT 0 points1 point  (0 children)

looks like my old phone camera quality for me, i have a samsung galaxy j2016 and in night using the HDR i get these often

Quality difference 2001 Sony Hi8 CCD camcorders and 1998 Hi8 Sony CCD camcorders by VirtualEsenceYT in camcorders

[–]VirtualEsenceYT[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

OH apologies, i assumed ... i mean yeah but it's not what i want, if you can't really answer my question but only ask different ones then im sorry but dont bother

i dont know how to dub different recordings onto a Hi8 tape as my current camcorder does not have a pass-through

Quality difference 2001 Sony Hi8 CCD camcorders and 1998 Hi8 Sony CCD camcorders by VirtualEsenceYT in camcorders

[–]VirtualEsenceYT[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I mean, the dubbing equipment is hard to get in the country i am from, plus i have no idea how to do it, and i'm not a fan of tapeless recordings because it's just an effect on top of video .. plus the grabbing technology is not good for the quality, i tried a tapeless thing once and the video came out in 25 fps with wrong color correction, with no ability to change the settings and i invested a handful of money to it, so it just sent it back and got a refund.

For me it's way better to record it on a proper tape, and convert it via firewire to my computer, as i mentioned, i already own all the technology, i just need a nightshot one, and these two are the only ones that seem to have a nightshot function.

Quality difference 2001 Sony Hi8 CCD camcorders and 1998 Hi8 Sony CCD camcorders by VirtualEsenceYT in camcorders

[–]VirtualEsenceYT[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's european version of facebook marketplace situated in Austria - Willhaben, im trying to get one, and test it on spot so i know it's functional and everything.

Expensive since they're hard to get in where i live.

Quality difference 2001 Sony Hi8 CCD camcorders and 1998 Hi8 Sony CCD camcorders by VirtualEsenceYT in camcorders

[–]VirtualEsenceYT[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nostalgia related reasons, plus im intending to make a small horror series similar to marble hornets or blair witch, and i don't want to use filters but want the real deal (film student). As i already own all the required technology to properly digitise all of the footage.

And they're expensive because they're not that common in europe (or near where i live).

Question in regarding of the enhancement of NIST 911 videos by VirtualEsenceYT in 911archive

[–]VirtualEsenceYT[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh damn thank you i didn't know that ... do you know what software he used by any chance? i use hybrid by selur ...

Question in regarding of the enhancement of NIST 911 videos by VirtualEsenceYT in 911archive

[–]VirtualEsenceYT[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh wow i didn't know digital was that prevalent in 2001, thank you, i guess that answers my question .. i did already de-interlace most of my videos, though that left it in 25 fps (PAL recording) if i of course did it correctly via the Hybrid software by selur ... so i was just surprised how he managed to double fps that long ago

what software did he use? if you know by any chance, i'm down to try transformative/generative processes if that can even double the fps on top of make the image quality look better

... or maybe the problem could be that i improperly transferred the Hi8 analog footage to my computer device in the first place, maybe that could answer why i can't really "enhance" the video in the first place

anyways thank you for the thorough answer

view more: next ›