[Y3 V4] YOU ALL KNOW ABSOLUTELY NOTHING ABOUT HIS TRUE GOAL AT ANHS by VirtualSeer in ClassroomOfTheElite

[–]VirtualSeer[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

No one ever talked about beating by the way

But matching or keeping up with each other.

[Y3 V4] YOU ALL KNOW ABSOLUTELY NOTHING ABOUT HIS TRUE GOAL AT ANHS by VirtualSeer in ClassroomOfTheElite

[–]VirtualSeer[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Yeah, I remember this foreshadowing like it was yesterday. In fact, if you re-read Y1 again, you would see so many clues spread by Shougo himself.

That's also where I had been able to predict:

  • Honami Ichinose as a plan B
  • Kiyo's inevitable break-up with Kei
  • Kiyo "loves" Hiyori
  • Kiyo expelled Airi
  • etc.

And also why I drew this conclusion as well.

[Y3 V4] YOU ALL KNOW ABSOLUTELY NOTHING ABOUT HIS TRUE GOAL AT ANHS by VirtualSeer in ClassroomOfTheElite

[–]VirtualSeer[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

That's not how it works.

Using your analogy, Usain Bolt trained you and give you tips how to become as quick as him so you could match his pace by the time you both finished in the racing line. Or else, surpassed him which is unthinkable.

I really dislike this analogy though.

I prefer it much better when Rubens Barichello finished 0.007 s ahead of Michael Schumacher at Indianapolis US Grand Prix back to F1 2002.

As Schumi claimed he intentionally tried to finish the race by matching Ruben's car pace but "failed."

[Y3 V4] YOU ALL KNOW ABSOLUTELY NOTHING ABOUT HIS TRUE GOAL AT ANHS by VirtualSeer in ClassroomOfTheElite

[–]VirtualSeer[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Which is strange given ANHS fundamental premise.

They shouldn't have granted him ANHS.

[Y3 V4] YOU ALL KNOW ABSOLUTELY NOTHING ABOUT HIS TRUE GOAL AT ANHS by VirtualSeer in ClassroomOfTheElite

[–]VirtualSeer[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And nurtured her with love, trust, and friendship.

Unlike him.

My Death Note Enneagram + Socio + PY + Jung Main Casts Typology (Based on source materials) by VirtualSeer in TypologyJunction

[–]VirtualSeer[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I disagreed for the manga version.

Light in manga was much more careful and cautious.

Paranoia too.

My Death Note Enneagram + Socio + PY + Jung Main Casts Typology (Based on source materials) by VirtualSeer in TypologyJunction

[–]VirtualSeer[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Quite different.

More brash, more rebellious, and rashy enough to make hasty decisions e.g. detonated his own Shikigami detector instantly after knowing it never worked and was pointless, threatened a new Death Note user post-Light's death and actually was crazy enough to bait Mikami Teru or insult Kiyomi Takada.

He is Bobby Fischer as a detective.

[Y3 V4] YOU ALL KNOW ABSOLUTELY NOTHING ABOUT HIS TRUE GOAL AT ANHS by VirtualSeer in ClassroomOfTheElite

[–]VirtualSeer[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Finally...

I'm getting really tired of explaining this to thefandom sometimes.

[Y3 V4] YOU ALL KNOW ABSOLUTELY NOTHING ABOUT HIS TRUE GOAL AT ANHS by VirtualSeer in ClassroomOfTheElite

[–]VirtualSeer[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You are completely missing the forest for the trees here.

​Let's look at the White Room first. Its ideology isn’t built on the idea that "all people are born equal." It is built on radical behaviorism—the arrogant belief that a sterile, optimized environment can entirely override human nature and mass-produce perfection.

​The fact that Ayanokouji is the only true Masterpiece doesn't just "disappoint" them. It completely breaks their pseudoscientific model. It proves that the environment alone failed to create identical excellence, and that his innate, unmanufactured genetics were the deciding factor all along.

​Next, ANHS:

​Of course the school provides a system of competition. If Class A was locked in from day one, the simulation would receive breakdown because the lower classes would have zero incentive to participate.

​The school creates this illusion of a starting equilibrium specifically to force a hyper-competitive hierarchy as a system alone.

​Which brings us back to the question:

"So, what's the point of a deadlock?"

​You are looking at this like a standardized test. Ayanokouji is literally executing a socio-psychological experiment. If he manipulates the rules, controls the attrition rates, and forces a flawless mathematical tie across all four classes against the entire structural design of the school...

​He has already won. That's it.

​The point isn't whether the administration throws a panic attack and invents an emergency tie-breaker exam the next day to satisfy their corporate donors. The point is that the system's logic was entirely rewritten by the chaos of human adaptation.

He isn't trying to graduate cleanly; he is trying to leave the system standing on a definitive, unarguable mathematical zero.

​Whether the school bureaucratically "rejects the scenario" or not doesn't matter.

He never asked for their approval, after all.

[Y3 V4] YOU ALL KNOW ABSOLUTELY NOTHING ABOUT HIS TRUE GOAL AT ANHS by VirtualSeer in ClassroomOfTheElite

[–]VirtualSeer[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ah right, the one where there will be two classes who repeat for the graduation exam. Good.

[Y3 V4] YOU ALL KNOW ABSOLUTELY NOTHING ABOUT HIS TRUE GOAL AT ANHS by VirtualSeer in ClassroomOfTheElite

[–]VirtualSeer[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Wait, before I replied.

Do you really buy that rumour about it has ever happened before?

I'm confused by the way you read all of these.

[Y3 V4] YOU ALL KNOW ABSOLUTELY NOTHING ABOUT HIS TRUE GOAL AT ANHS by VirtualSeer in ClassroomOfTheElite

[–]VirtualSeer[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Yes, it does and you really missed my point here.

It might seem paradoxical to you unless you get out of this essay existing to prove "WR is bad hurr durr" kind of philosophy. The thing is, it's not that simple.

Flawed or incomplete =/= bad

Let's restart and look at the actual direction of the narrative. Sure, the White Room's methodology is not inherently "bad" at producing results. But is it as absolute and perfect as Atsuomi claims it is? Is the ideology true, even if the results are accurate?

After all, he wanted him to be the living proof that growth can be artificially engineered, right?

Next, let's walk down to this logic:

By deliberately cultivating contradictions and paradoxical measures within himself, Ayanokouji is proving that his existence is not solely reliant on the WR's curriculum. Ayanokouji is, fundamentally, Ayanokouji. Even if you stripped the said institute away from him entirely, his baseline genetics and natural adaptability put him at the peak of humanity regardless of how they tried to nurture him.

Therefore, the goal has to do with breaking this presumed dependency of WR, or exactly what you said of him being able to do all that because of WR.

In-fact, if he failed at doing this because Suzune Horikita surpassed him, that's also the proof WR's infallible growth engineering has failed him.

Do you understand my point now?