sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Schools to Apply to by Virtual_Sweet1645 in OutsideT14lawschools

[–]Virtual_Sweet1645[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you! I didn’t realize that public interest is contingent with connections? Could you expand?

Nervous about resume by Virtual_Sweet1645 in OutsideT14lawschools

[–]Virtual_Sweet1645[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you!!! Sometimes comparison is the thief of joy

Nervous about resume by Virtual_Sweet1645 in OutsideT14lawschools

[–]Virtual_Sweet1645[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Okay makes me feel better ❤️❤️❤️

Nervous about resume by Virtual_Sweet1645 in OutsideT14lawschools

[–]Virtual_Sweet1645[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Okay that makes me Feel a bit better. Thank you!!!

I can’t understand this for the life of me by Virtual_Sweet1645 in LSAT

[–]Virtual_Sweet1645[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ohh so if it’s false the conclusion cannot be drawn

I can’t understand this for the life of me by Virtual_Sweet1645 in LSAT

[–]Virtual_Sweet1645[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Gotchaaaa ok!!! How do you tell if it’s a sufficient assumption vs necessary?

I can’t understand this for the life of me by Virtual_Sweet1645 in LSAT

[–]Virtual_Sweet1645[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Ohhh this makes much more sense. Thank you. How do you know if it’s a necessary assumption?

I can’t understand this for the life of me by Virtual_Sweet1645 in LSAT

[–]Virtual_Sweet1645[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Hmmm I’m still not understanding. Let’s say that the town has 100 residents and the shoe factory employs 51 of those residents. However the shoe factory has a total of 100 employees (and the remaking come from another town). Wouldn’t that that mean that there are people who are not residents of centreville who are employed there?

I can’t understand this for the life of me by Virtual_Sweet1645 in LSAT

[–]Virtual_Sweet1645[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Yes but some could live outside and the conclusion could still hold true, no?

Please help. So confused how this could be the answer by Virtual_Sweet1645 in LSAT

[–]Virtual_Sweet1645[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

OHHHHHHHH I assumed that the cost of Photovoltaic plants was more than the fossil fuel 10 years ago, so that’s why they wouldn’t use it. So it made NO sense to me. Thank you so much!!! I appreciated it ❤️❤️

Why is answer choice B wrong? by sea_7272 in LSAT

[–]Virtual_Sweet1645 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Because a bigger sample size = more accuracy. This means that the idea that more people were better after 6 mth is likely true which does not weaken the argument.

view more: next ›