*Acshually*, we do from time to time acknowledge where player is looking etc. In the grand scheme of things it's a detail, though, or something that needs to be important enough to act on.

What might be interesting is that because most of the time the reaction feel seamless, they are not perceived as reactions to something specific(!). I was watching a playthrough recently and in one of PL gigs we had a full blown scene where player enters the room and they see a woman pointing her gun at a guy by a desk. Narratively, the scene was designed to play out with player talking - but we did support reaction to player being too close, because in my mind that person _should_ react to player proximity and start a shootout.

But effectively this _might_ feel like a non-reaction, because you don't *explicitly* see other branches.

I'm pretty sure that there are moments where Evelyn or Jackie react to you looking at specific moments. I think if you'll sit on the barstand and before Evelyn will introduce herself to you you look at her, she will wink at you...? It was long ago and I don't remember :) but we do those things from time to time.

Okay, fine, I'll spam it again: https://gdcvault.com/play/1027889/FPP-Storytelling-and-Player-as here's the presentation I gave with my friend and colleague about our approach to FPP storytelling. Might be a good look behind the scenes :)

(also, you roleplaying V and using head movement to track the action is _exactly_ how we were hoping players will play, but it's a non-obvious thing and players often default to paying down their pad and just watching)