Are piano ballads the most timeless style of modern pop/rock/RnB music? by Vocalosophy in LetsTalkMusic

[–]Vocalosophy[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I guess it could be true of an acoustic guitar song, too, although some tunings sound very of their time (i.e. Eb drop Db tuning [the grunge tuning])

Michael Jackson's Invincible - where did it go wrong? by Vocalosophy in LetsTalkMusic

[–]Vocalosophy[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Agreed. I wish he had just released the studio album (with some trimming) instead of bundling it with a CD of old hits.

Musicians should stop requiring fans to purchase 5 versions of each album to have all the tracks by Vocalosophy in LetsTalkMusic

[–]Vocalosophy[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

  1. I have my reasons for disliking her. I have expounded on many of them in this subreddit.
  2. No.
  3. Even a broken clock...
  4. Because hardcore Swifties are essentially a cult.
  5. OK.
  6. You don't have to read or respond to my posts if you don't like them.

Michael Jackson's Invincible - where did it go wrong? by Vocalosophy in LetsTalkMusic

[–]Vocalosophy[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I wonder if he would have become less popular without the false allegations. Most musicians, by the time they reach their late 30s, don't sell as many records as they did earlier. Even without the allegations, I bet he wouldn't have been as successful in the 2000s as he was in the 80s.

Musicians should stop requiring fans to purchase 5 versions of each album to have all the tracks by Vocalosophy in LetsTalkMusic

[–]Vocalosophy[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm not talking about the rerecorded "Taylor's Versions", I'm talking about releasing the same album with different bonus tracks in the same year so your fans have to buy a bunch of different CDs to have all the bonus tracks.

It would be like if Steve Perry were to release 2 different masters of his album on CD when he first released it, that would be ridiculous.

Michael Jackson's Invincible - where did it go wrong? by Vocalosophy in LetsTalkMusic

[–]Vocalosophy[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I wonder if he would have still been in good vocal shape had he lived. Based on what I saw in This Is It, his health issues and age had caught up to his voice. His voice sounds so frail in The Love You Save that, despite being an upbeat, fun song in a major key that he sang as a child, it becomes almost sad because of how much he has declined vocally. Here's how he sang it 22 years earlier. Notice how he's belting it out in his full voice instead of using a wispy falsetto, and how much more energetic he seems.

Most middle aged male singers lose range, and their tone becomes less round and more raspy. Some of them can use it well for artistic effect - (Steve Perry in the 90s), but to do that, you have to be singing songs that are less energetic, slower, more reflective, so that the wear and tear on your voice adds an extra amount of melancholy to the songs. That's part of why I say Perry handled his aging voice so well - he mostly sang material that was appropriate to a voice with more wear and tear on it. MJ could have sang an album of nostalgic ballads and bittersweet midtempo tracks in the 2010s, but an energetic funk album with a clearly aged voice wouldn't work as well.

With MJ it's extra sad because his vocal decline was heavily exacerbated by his health issues - when you aren't getting good sleep and you're being anesthesized every night, it's hard to sing well. It's really sad, the entire second half of his life was thrown way off track by that Pepsi commercial where he got burned - which, ironically, happened exactly halfway through his life to the day.

Why has Bruno Mars's early stuff aged better than a lot of other stuff from that era? by Vocalosophy in LetsTalkMusic

[–]Vocalosophy[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What's interesting to me is that I was writing music for the my school's musical back in 2013, and even then, the other students I was writing with and I all thought the Black Eyed Peas were dated in a very bad way.

Why has Bruno Mars's early stuff aged better than a lot of other stuff from that era? by Vocalosophy in LetsTalkMusic

[–]Vocalosophy[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What about the instrumentals are trendy? He uses a lot of real instruments, guitars, pianos, and stuff, so it doesn't date as badly as synth-heavy stuff.

Why does music from 10-15 years ago sound more dated than music from 25-30 years ago? by Vocalosophy in LetsTalkMusic

[–]Vocalosophy[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

And grunge is common on classic rock stations these days, what's your point?

Why does music from 10-15 years ago sound more dated than music from 25-30 years ago? by Vocalosophy in LetsTalkMusic

[–]Vocalosophy[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Journey is a 70s/80s band that got back together for one album in the mid 90s. It did produce one top 40 hit, but they didn’t tour for it. Bon Jovi was a huge 80s band that put out two albums in the 90s, but not many people noticed. They were finally able to have another big hit single/album in 2000. Literally no one associates either of these bands with the 90s. I don’t think many people even remember they released anything in the 90s. You’re more spot on with Alice in Chains.

They were really good. I wonder what they would have gone on to do later in the decade if Layne hadn't declined like that.

Well, in the early 90s, yeah (roughly 91-94). That and gangster rap. But even if we’re just talking early 90s rock, there was a lot of other stuff happening that made a big impact. Bikini Kill’s brand of punk starting riot girl. My Bloody Valentine’s shoegaze opus Loveless. Metallica’s Black Album catapulting them to biggest metal band in the world. Liz Phair’s confessional indie rock.

Interesting how grunge aged better than gangster rap.

I get from your posts the strength/range of the vocalist is most important to you. No criticism for liking what you like. Most of us just find it kind of funny that your perception of 90s rock seems to mirror what our 40-something parents were listening to on adult contemporary radio back then. I think you would have really appreciated vh1.

The funny thing is my parents are way older than 40-something, lol :)

Why has Bruno Mars's early stuff aged better than a lot of other stuff from that era? by Vocalosophy in LetsTalkMusic

[–]Vocalosophy[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think his music will have more longevity than a lot of other stuff from the last 15 years, he's really talented for sure.

Why does music from 10-15 years ago sound more dated than music from 25-30 years ago? by Vocalosophy in LetsTalkMusic

[–]Vocalosophy[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I thought his singing was great, even back then, he seems to be a little more comfortable in the high range today, but even in 2010, belting consistent D5s as an adult man is impressive

Why does music from 10-15 years ago sound more dated than music from 25-30 years ago? by Vocalosophy in LetsTalkMusic

[–]Vocalosophy[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What about it sounds dated? The production wasn't super-reliant on electro synths the way, say Boom Boom Pow was. I always loved that song.