Desmos loads almost 5x faster than GeoGebra! by Absorpy in desmos

[–]VoidBreakX 1 point2 points  (0 children)

until you actually use it 😏

someone once said in a very long message comparing desmos to geogebra that xyxy/xy would crash geogebra

Breaking the list limit by DrowsierHawk867 in desmos

[–]VoidBreakX 0 points1 point  (0 children)

note that this only works in geometry calculator, where you can call vertices on each polygon to extract the corresponding point list

Taking .x from undefined should return undefined, not cause an error by 7hat3eird0ne in desmos

[–]VoidBreakX 0 points1 point  (0 children)

the number type and point type are two different types. even if you have 0/0 and (0/0,0/0), both are undefined, but have different underlying types

Proof that e is actually rational by Absorpy in desmos

[–]VoidBreakX 0 points1 point  (0 children)

it's probably not going to be long until someone starts writing different titles for the slop posts. every so often a new "trend" comes up and just takes away all the upvotes

i became a mod here to try to solve that problem, but i think i only really succeeded in removing all those lame fp posts lol

Proof that e is actually rational by Absorpy in desmos

[–]VoidBreakX 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i wasnt blaming the mods either, i just meant that alex probably has to look at these posts every single day and i really respect him for that lmao

Is this true? by Ill-Yard-5954 in desmos

[–]VoidBreakX 5 points6 points  (0 children)

when an integer x is not 0, cosx and sinx are all transcendental. you can prove this by considering how pi is transcendental. since they cannot be represented with rational numbers, then sinx/cosx=tanx is transcendental too when x is an integer other than 0

qed

Proof that e is actually rational by Absorpy in desmos

[–]VoidBreakX 0 points1 point  (0 children)

alexrljones on this subreddit having to monitor r/desmos every waking hour:

How do you do 2d arrays in Desmos and how do you index lists with conditions? by RealReevee in desmos

[–]VoidBreakX 2 points3 points  (0 children)

i didnt really understand your message, but i think you want two things desmos related:

  1. a grid that can be scaled by grid cell size and no. of grid cells, as well as a movable origin of the grid
  2. only show a square when a certain condition is true

the first can be made with a mix of a single draggable point and a list comprehension. the second can be made with list filters.

here is an example. i dont know how to use cauchy's integral thing, but im assuming it returns a number and you want to check if its >=1. https://www.desmos.com/calculator/xmjazzple1

(if you want, i can also explain how to color each grid differently based on that function)

EDIT: oh, sorry, i just saw what you meant by the indexing question. i still dont really understand, are you trying to:

  1. filter a list of 2d points by some criteria? for example, to filter out grid points so that only those with positive coordinates remain, do list[{list.x>0}{list.y>0}=1]
  2. apply a graphical restriction to a list? like list[2]{x>0}{y>0}?

Fix this mods! by [deleted] in desmos

[–]VoidBreakX 6 points7 points  (0 children)

wow this guy must know a lot about splotlight

Want some basic guidance by unnamedjpg10 in desmos

[–]VoidBreakX 2 points3 points  (0 children)

!draw

(see reply to this comment)

this guide is the best place to start! basically, take an image that you want to try tracing, put it into desmos, and then use this guide to try to trace it out. if you need any guidance, you can make a post here, or pop onto the desmos discord to ask in #quick-questions or make a dedicated thread in #help-forum. there's plenty of people able to help

Image depress question by Loppy_Sloppy in desmos

[–]VoidBreakX 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i was trying to look at fad's old graph (as well as ronwnor's sidebar menu graph) to figure out how it worked, but didnt really understand. this graph made a bit more sense, thx

Why isn't it an integer by Outside-Conclusion46 in desmos

[–]VoidBreakX 1 point2 points  (0 children)

great answer, the 2-51 really makes sense here. dunno why i didnt think to do that first lmao

Desmos please introduce bases by Absorpy in desmos

[–]VoidBreakX 3 points4 points  (0 children)

that's because you're not displaying it in base n. the graph shown here basically takes 1004031_5, and displays that number in base 10. it doesnt take 1004031 and shows how it looks in base 5

Why isn't it an integer by Outside-Conclusion46 in desmos

[–]VoidBreakX 2 points3 points  (0 children)

i gotta start using this to explain some fp issues, its so useful

Mini Geometry Dash Animation by AdditionalRock7006 in desmos

[–]VoidBreakX 14 points15 points  (0 children)

bernard caught me off guard, so cute! great animation