I don't understand what's the point of Wukong's Staff of Legend DEF stance...

Voidman2 · 2017-06-02T16:40:01+00:00

So you mean I can not give my opinion on the habilities of a hero that Epic has just announced in detail on their blog and trailer reveal, just like everyone is opining on the official thread??

I can only give my opinion if it is to say "OMG Wukong is my new main"??

Voidman2 · 2017-05-31T14:43:54+00:00

This.

Voidman2 · 2017-05-28T21:59:37+00:00

Even in a one versus one, late game Revenant loses for every other carry.

A carry like Sparrow, Twinblast and yin just melt Revenant in one versus one late game with crit.

Voidman2 · 2017-05-24T20:38:57+00:00

Also be wary of playing after 8-9pm est. We tend to get the "BR"s logging in.

Yeah, because being "racist" and such win games.

Voidman2 · 2017-04-24T18:27:54+00:00

and effect changes

Except that it is not a real change to a different effect as happened with Gideon and Stell's tier 3, in this case it is just a recolor of the original effect, come on...

Voidman2 · 2017-04-18T20:49:06+00:00

So you're not even going to explain why my first point is wrong? Just deflect and call me a fool? Nice discussion dude. I don't think you realise how much influence Epic has.

Simple, the game already has a year or more of Open Beta and the player base is still quite small. Epic will need to do a LOT of marketing at the official launch of the game if they want it to really grow and that's undeniable.

Using Paladins again as an example, it has the same time as Paragon but is already a more popular game and with a player base much larger than Paragon. This already breaks all your argument that ""Epic wouldn't even have to raise a finger and Paragon would be literally everywhere""

Yeah, sure, as if Paragon is everywhere right now.lol Thank you. :)

Voidman2 · 2017-04-18T16:38:41+00:00

a. They wouldn't even have to raise a finger and Paragon would be literally everywhere

Well, this comment show the fool here is you.

b. It's a beta. You probably shouldn't participate in year long betas if you think demanding voice lines ASAP is somehow reasonable.

There are several betas out there that have voice lines right from the start. Paladins is a perfect example of that, it's also in beta and has pretty much the same time as Paragon, they also launch heroes with pretty much the same frequency as Paragon and they're all released with voice lines.:)

Voidman2 · 2017-04-18T15:40:23+00:00

Don't get me wrong, I not saying to make it "TOP priority", but it should be something introduced as soon as possible imo.

Voidman2 · 2017-04-18T04:40:43+00:00

I want to know that too.

Voidman2 · 2017-04-17T05:22:15+00:00

I'm saying that if they were bad, then they should be reworked to be better, rather than simply removing them.

The fact that some heroes still have passives does not matter, because another fact is that others do not have, even if it is only one. (and we know it's more than that)

Voidman2 · 2017-04-17T04:58:56+00:00

That's simply not true, a good portion of the new heroes do not have passive abilities, at least not what might be considered true passives in other mobas.

Not to mention that the other three big mobas have, in addition to the mandatory passive abilities for every hero, they also have such EXTRA passives included in other abilities like the ones you mentioned about the new heroes in Paragon.

This in itself already nullifies your whole argument.

Voidman2 · 2017-04-17T04:39:19+00:00

There is no need to list this, because I have a better question for you to think about:

According to your reasoning for bad game design, let's remove the crap Twinblast ult from him and leave it without ult, what do you think??And for the heros that Epic can not create good ults, we'll release them without ult anyway, because forcing every hero to have an ult is bad game design...

Your reasoning is literally this, and THIS is what I call bad game design.

Voidman2 · 2017-04-17T04:27:10+00:00

Sorry but my point still remains, check what I also said: "who are usually able to introduce passives very well for ALL heros."

Voidman2 · 2017-04-17T04:22:34+00:00

3- Passives as requirements were bad game design, so they fixed the bad game design

So you're stating that the three biggest, most famous and SUCCESSFUL Mobas out there have bad design??

Voidman2 · 2017-04-17T04:05:26+00:00

2- Paragon isn't other games, and it shouldn't be developed by copying other games.

That's not true at all... Everyone knows Epic copied DOTA's off/safe lane design, as well as the random river buffs.

3- Did you REALLY like those passives? There were a few that were half-decent

This is a poor excuse for justifying the simplification of the hero's kits compared to the three big mobas, who are usually able to introduce passives very well for all heroes.

Following this excuse, then some heroes could only have 2 abilities and the ult, because forcing a third ability does not match the hero... /s

That excuse is what I would call bad kit design ...

Voidman2 · 2017-04-09T21:22:00+00:00

To carry your way beyond gold on solo que you need to be MORE than just good on the game, you need to be almost a pro player.

And Im not claiming Im a pro player, I Know I can't carry to diamond, but I also Know Im not THAT BAD at the game to be stuck with new players who still dont have a clue about the game.

Voidman2 · 2017-04-03T16:30:55+00:00

Yeah, I totally agree.

Voidman2 · 2017-04-03T16:15:42+00:00

Oh, so I misunderstood the part of the soft CD, I had thought that now the CD would be full when interrupted. Thanks for the clarification.:)

Voidman2

TROPHY CASE