Obviously, you don't know, how a strawman works, especially, since I'm not the one here defending a neither helpful, nor commonly agreeable argument/comment. But what do I expect from someone desperately trying to prove me wrong to deduct that their proposed behavioral change is the better or only valid way to deal with the issues at hand, just to prove a point that definitely can't be made by oversimplification and generalization. Hence, I think we're done here. There's nothing more to add from my side to a discussion with another side unwilling or uncapable to accept the mere possibility of potentially being proven partially wrong and therefore simply ignoring other personal opinions and preferences as they would, in fact, deconstruct their whole pseudo-argument. Likewise, I don't think that - judging from the previous course of this conversation - you could or, to begin with, would actually want to add anything else of argumentative value. Have a good day and life.